****Kyle Rittenhouse Trial-VERDICT WATCH-Day 2****

169,105 Views | 1814 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by Who?mikejones!
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Judge ain't ready for prime time.
P.H. Dexippus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Judge allowing the jury to view the video. Counsel agrees to multiple views of video.
The story isn't that [DeSantis] "couldn't win" the primary. The story is that an overwhelming majority of our population is heinously stupid. 50% of them vote for communists. 75% of the remaining 50% vote for Trump, who cant win. When the majority of the opposition party insists on voting for an opposition candidate who can't win, you get exactly the government you deserve. - Well Endowed Ag
Proc92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
powerbelly said:

aggiehawg said:

F***ing Judge! Hasn't even read the motion to dismiss!!!!!
WTF has he been doing?
Because the response hasn't been filed. Why not read them at the same time? I do t know the deadline for the response.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jury wants to watch the blurry video again.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FriscoKid said:

Jury wants to watch the blurry video again.


That's not good
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FriscoKid said:

Judge is 100% pro Kyle. He wants the jury to decide this way too.


If he was 100%, this thing would have been tossed already
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mr. AGSPRT04 said:

Judge allowing the video to view the video. Counsel agrees to multiple views of video.


Nobody knows how many times it should be.

This sham needs to end.

Judge you need to address how the software company says this stuff shouldnt be used for evidence
turf guy ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Richards is an idiot. Public defenders are more competent than this clown.
Whirligigs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kyle is going to be sacrificed
P.H. Dexippus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's not going to grant mistrial. He's going off on how the judiciary doesn't respect the judgment of juries.
The story isn't that [DeSantis] "couldn't win" the primary. The story is that an overwhelming majority of our population is heinously stupid. 50% of them vote for communists. 75% of the remaining 50% vote for Trump, who cant win. When the majority of the opposition party insists on voting for an opposition candidate who can't win, you get exactly the government you deserve. - Well Endowed Ag
agcrock2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This judge is very hard to listen to.
TheHulkster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
To be fair, this entire courtroom is full of idiots.
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is so damn frustrating. I cannot believe neither side apparently does not have even a half-ass technical expert. As I mentioned yesterday the AI argument is non-sequitur. Bi-cubic interpolation does add pixels but it's not AI...
AggiePetro07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why is the defense not doing what Binger has been doing? Argue for your ****ing client.
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So ok, since they are wanting to look at the video, can we speculate on why? Has it come down to provocation and self defense claims in their deliberations? Is the jury wanting to see Kyle running away from Rosenbaum to reassure themselves that he retreated first? Is the jury wanting to see for themselves if there was actually a provocation or a rifle pointed at anybody who was paying attention to it?
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mr. AGSPRT04 said:

He's not going to grant mistrial. He's going off on how the judiciary doesn't respect the judgment of juries.


The judiciary apparently doesn't respect the 5th or rules of evidence. Makes it hard to trust the jury when the jury is allowed to be fed BS
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ11 said:

FriscoKid said:

Jury wants to watch the blurry video again.


That's not good
Why not? There is nothing there. It will give the pro Kyle jurors a chance to show the holdouts the truth. They will also get to see Kyle getting chased into a corner.
agdad4x
How long do you want to ignore this user?
if that is the case, so will our entire justice system
DTP02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ABATTBQ11 said:

FriscoKid said:

Jury wants to watch the blurry video again.


That's not good


That's unknown. If you're a holdout juror staking your view on provocation and everyone else on the jury is saying you can't even tell what's happening on the video, watching the video again would make sense for both sides.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Proc92 said:

powerbelly said:

aggiehawg said:

F***ing Judge! Hasn't even read the motion to dismiss!!!!!
WTF has he been doing?
Because the response hasn't been filed. Why not read them at the same time? I do t know the deadline for the response.
Normally the judge would issue a minute order giving a deadline, even a short one for response. But he has to read the freakin' motion to determine if it is an emergency matter and order accordingly.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FriscoKid said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

FriscoKid said:

Jury wants to watch the blurry video again.


That's not good
Why not? There is nothing there. It will give the pro Kyle jurors a chance to show the holdouts the truth. They will also get to see Kyle getting chased into a corner.


It's not clear what they even want to look at
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Proc92 said:

powerbelly said:

aggiehawg said:

F***ing Judge! Hasn't even read the motion to dismiss!!!!!
WTF has he been doing?
Because the response hasn't been filed. Why not read them at the same time? I do t know the deadline for the response.
So set a F-ing deadline! All the prosecution has to do to avoid having the motion ruled on is just not turn in their response? WTF is up with that?
P.H. Dexippus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Because it's the "evidence" the state is hanging their case on.
The story isn't that [DeSantis] "couldn't win" the primary. The story is that an overwhelming majority of our population is heinously stupid. 50% of them vote for communists. 75% of the remaining 50% vote for Trump, who cant win. When the majority of the opposition party insists on voting for an opposition candidate who can't win, you get exactly the government you deserve. - Well Endowed Ag
rgag12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DTP02 said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

FriscoKid said:

Jury wants to watch the blurry video again.


That's not good


That's unknown. If you're a holdout staking your view on provocation and everyone else is saying you can't even tell what's happening there, watching the video again would make sense for both sides.


If you thought you saw something in that video you are going to holdout for convicting Kyle IMO
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They are allowing Binger to comment while the jury is watching the video? That doesn't seem right.
Ozzy Osbourne
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whirligigs said:

Kyle is going to be sacrificed


Rally caps on for Kyle
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let the jury watch it all they want but no commentary from the prosecution or the defense. Let them make their own narrative

But address the damn motion on the very evidence they are wanting to view dammit
“ How you fellas doin? We about to have us a little screw party in this red Prius over here if you wanna join us.”
Spotted Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
**** like this is exactly why I don't trust our justice system. It is no longer blind.
BlackGoldAg2011
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RED AG 98 said:

This is so damn frustrating. I cannot believe neither side apparently does not have even a half-ass technical expert. As I mentioned yesterday the AI argument is non-sequitur. Bi-cubic interpolation does add pixels but it's not AI...
this is baffling to me as well. i am no technical expert on digital imagining, but as an engineer it has take me less than 2 days of research to get up to speed on the technology and what is going on around these videos and photos. and that is just in my free time. it is literally these guys paying job to do this right now.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Judge knows the outcome at this point. 100%

This is all for show. They'll order lunch.

Will read the verdict just before prime time on east coast.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

Judge knows the outcome at this point. 100%

This is all for show. They'll order lunch.

Will read the verdict just before prime time on east coast.


We wish but unless the judge knows for certain that he will dismiss with prejudice then I doubt it
agcrock2005
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FriscoKid said:

They are allowing Binger to comment while the jury is watching the video? That doesn't seem right.
I don't think that's the case. My understanding is it will just be the judge and jury in there correct?
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rgag12 said:

DTP02 said:

ABATTBQ11 said:

FriscoKid said:

Jury wants to watch the blurry video again.


That's not good


That's unknown. If you're a holdout staking your view on provocation and everyone else is saying you can't even tell what's happening there, watching the video again would make sense for both sides.


If you thought you saw something in that video you are going to holdout for convicting Kyle IMO

It is Rorschach evidence. People who want acquittal will see nothing, people who are convinced he is guilty will see provocation.

The prosecution are scumbags for introducing this interpolated mess.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Judge doesn't even know if the defendant can be present for the jury viewing the video? Can't let the state cue up the videos, either.

This messes with the deliberation phase of the case. Should only be the judge, bailiff and required court personnel.
AggiePetro07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Stat Monitor Repairman said:

Judge knows the outcome at this point. 100%

This is all for show. They'll order lunch.

Will read the verdict just before prime time on east coast.
This is what I'm hoping for. He knows the acquittal is coming. Why burn political capital if you don't have to?

I think it's chicken ****, but...
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.