It's a little odd that they are dropping it later on a Friday.

That is usually the time slot to get stuff buried.

It's probably an "open investigation" like the DoJ and FBI had during all the Trump years to give cover to all their officers and officials so they, "Can't comment while there's an open investigation..."

will25u said:

---

It's a little odd that they are dropping it later on a Friday.

That is usually the time slot to get stuff buried.

---

Think that timing was set in late August after the State AG told Maricopa County to stop screwing around and produce what had been subpoenaed but gave them 30 days to do it.

will25u said:

---

It's a little odd that they are dropping it later on a Friday.

That is usually the time slot to get stuff buried.

---

Maybe we'll see a Project Veritas style cascading of the report details over time. Drop the first bit, get the response frenzy going, drop the next bit that blows up the response, rinse, repeat.

REPORT: Georgia official says a secret election audit is underway in Fulton County 🚨🚨🚨https://t.co/UDHo3Ej9gG

— RSBN 🇺🇸 (@RSBNetwork) September 20, 2021

One of those double secret audits.

will25u said:

---

REPORT: Georgia official says a secret election audit is underway in Fulton County 🚨🚨🚨https://t.co/UDHo3Ej9gG

— RSBN 🇺🇸 (@RSBNetwork) September 20, 2021

---

I can't tell if this is a good thing or a bad thing. Is this a legit investigation or a coverup investigation? Considering state action so far, I am inclined to go with coverup.

Quote:

---

I can't tell if this is a good thing or a bad thing. Is this a legit investigation or a coverup investigation? Considering state action so far, I am inclined to go with coverup.

---

Cover up, more likely. I say that because that was mentioned as a reason to keep Amero from ruling yesterday to allow the ballot images being rescanned in 1200 DPI. Trying to get the Judge to kick the can down the road again.

And it worked. Another 20-30 days for briefing and we don't know how long after for a hearing and a ruling.

Favorito says he has seen no evidence that the Georgia Bureau of Investigations is doing any sort of investigation into the existence of counterfeit ballots in Fulton County. Suzi Voyles, long time Fulton County elections worker and supervisor, filed an affidavit stating she saw obvious counterfeit ballots at the State Farm Arena counting center. She was thereafter fire for filing that affidavit.

But she has not been contacted, much less interviewed by the GBI. She has batch #s too, if I'm not mistaken. Pretty dang simple to find those batches of ballots to examine them to see if there is any truth to her claims. They have not done so. Did the lawyers lie to Judge Amero?

Sure does sound like it. Of course there is no criminal liability for a lawyer lying to a judge since what theysay isn't evidence but deliberately misleading he court can lead to court imposed sanctions.

Quote:

---

On Monday evening Garland Favorito, the co-founder of VoterGA released a statement on today's hearing.
VoterGA believes the hearing today validated their previous findings.

Quote:

---

"Today the court confirmed several things we have said all along:
[ol]

There is prima facie evidence of election fraud in the affidavits from senior poll managers who swear they handled counterfeit ballots in the Fulton Co hand count audit

The Equal Protection and Due Process claims of the petitioners are valid allegations of Constitutional rights violations based on the evidence

An inspection of the ballots must be made to determine if they are counterfeit and whether or not the Constitutional rights of the petitioners have been violated

The Petitioners obviously have the correct standing to pursue their claims

[/ol]We will be delayed another two months because the attorney representing the Democrats on the Fulton County Election Board provided what we believe is obvious false information to the court.

The GBI has never interviewed Suzi Voyles, conducted an investigation into counterfeit ballots or claimed that Suzi Voyles recanted any part of her affidavit."

---

---

Link

Now the Secretary of State's office or some Fulton County officials may be conducting some half-assed investigation,,er,,,coverup but that is not a criminal investigation warranting any stay in this civil proceeding.

As I have stated before, only a criminal investigation by the GBI might be something that would warrant staying the rescan of the ballot images, at a minimum. But if they really aren't looking into it?

This is not that hard. GBI knows the players on the ground. They know who Ruby Freeman and her daughter are. They know who Ralph Jones and Rick Barron are. They know who Suzi Voyles is. Have they been interviewed? Appears the answer to that is no, they have not.

I like Gateway Pundit, but GP loves to sensationalize it's headlines. Unfortunately after reading the article, I'm kind of meh. This official is just talking off the cuff and doesn't say anything specific or actionable. He sounds like a typical F16 drive-by post with no substantiation "This ________ is bull*****"

Yeah, it's not crazy to insinuate out loud that calling a recount an "audit" is bull scat or that trying to give credibility to a recount as if it proves no fraud is bull scat. Everyone knows it's bull scat. The left (no idea where Steve Chucri is on the spectrum) just can't say it out loud because the left is relying on recounts to say, "there was no fraud". "The forensic audit wasn't necessary. The forensic auditors are biased. We already did an independent audit and found nothing. The conspiracy theorists lost every court case" etc. etc. etc.

peacedude said:

---

Lindell was on War Room this morning, and said his team's finalized report will be ready for SCOTUS prior to Thanksgiving.

The symposium led to county CANVASSES across the country (mostly red states), and the findings show that ALL Dominion machines were hacked. Dom reps rigged every one of them, so many state's SoS are compromised (CO, GA, AZ, PA, WI, MI, etc, etc).

I'm guessing it's the same states Pompeo said were compromised, including TX (sip leaders).

---

Does he just fax it to SCOTUS, or does the report have to be hand delivered?

Does SCOTUS then affirm, or reverse, and possibly remand the report back to Lindell? I'm curious how the Supreme Court typically handles reports.

peacedude said:

---

Lindell was on War Room this morning, and said his team's finalized report will be ready for SCOTUS prior to Thanksgiving.

The symposium led to county CANVASSES across the country (mostly red states), and the findings show that ALL Dominion machines were hacked. Dom reps rigged every one of them, so many state's SoS are compromised (CO, GA, AZ, PA, WI, MI, etc, etc).

I'm guessing it's the same states Pompeo said were compromised, including TX (sip leaders).

---

SCOTUS? Is there some election case that will be before the Court where he could file an amicus?

Or does he think state AG's will file against other states for original jurisdiction again?

Or is he just FOS?

The replay was just posted, so time to watch again. No clue if he's FOS: https://americasvoice.news/playlists/the-war-room/

captkirk said:

---

EXCLUSIVE… Maricopa County Supervisor Steve Chucri Caught in Leaked Recording: The Maricopa County Voting Machine Company Audit and Recount "Was Pretty BULLSH*T By The Way" (AUDIO)
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/exclusive-maricopa-county-supervisor-steve-chucri-caught-leaked-recording-maricopa-county-voting-machine-company-audit-recount-pretty-bullsht-way-audio/

---

Definitely agree, but we were saying that long ago.

Quote:

---

Chucri even said that the county's audit, led by the companies that certified the equipment, was "bullsh*t" and said he thinks his colleagues are afraid of an audit because of how close their races were.

---

If you read the two "audits" from Pro V&V and SLI, they are a complete joke. They make statements of "no internet connectivity" but you can quickly find out they only looked at some hand-picked voting machines logs and nothing with regards to routers/switches/etc.

Also, in one, I cannot remember which, they examined (5) machines. One was from stock and had never been used (worthless test) and another had the seal removed before they got it.....they actually added a footnote that in short said, "meh, it didn't have a seal, but that happens all the time as a matter of procedure" without providing those instances or procedures.

Quote:

---

If you read the two "audits" from Pro V&V and SLI, they are a complete joke. They make statements of "no internet connectivity" but you can quickly find out they only looked at some hand-picked voting machines logs and nothing with regards to routers/switches/etc.

Also, in one, I cannot remember which, they examined (5) machines. One was from stock and had never been used (worthless test) and another had the seal removed before they got it.....they actually added a footnote that in short said, "meh, it didn't have a seal, but that happens all the time as a matter of procedure" without providing those instances or procedures.

---

Not to mention that at one time or another, both Pro V&V and SLI certified Dominion's systems as secure and Pro V&V's CEO testified on behalf of the Georgia Sec of State in the Curling v. Raffensperger suit before the election. Neither one of those very small outfits had financial incentive to find anything

Quote:

---

Not to mention that at one time or another, both Pro V&V and SLI certified Dominion's systems as secure and Pro V&V's CEO testified on behalf of the Georgia Sec of State in the Curling v. Raffensperger suit before the election. Neither one of those very small outfits had financial incentive to find anything

---

So much this..... Who expected that either company would find carelessness, neglecence, or malfeasance? That an actual employee or leader of this company would find fault and report themselves culpable and at fault.....yeah, was, never, going, to, happen.

At best, these two companies where simply shells to rubber-stamp whatever they were given.

We fixed the keg said:

---

Quote:

---

Not to mention that at one time or another, both Pro V&V and SLI certified Dominion's systems as secure and Pro V&V's CEO testified on behalf of the Georgia Sec of State in the Curling v. Raffensperger suit before the election. Neither one of those very small outfits had financial incentive to find anything

---

So much this..... Who expected that either company would find carelessness, neglecence, or malfeasance? That an actual employee or leader of this company would find fault and report themselves culpable and at fault.....yeah, was, never, going, to, happen.

At best, these two companies where simply shells to rubber-stamp whatever they were given.

---

I'm still wondering why the "fully auditable" Runbeck procedures have not been "fully audited"???

Remember they did all of the mail in ballots for Fulton County too. They are supposed to have the numbers of how many they printed and sent out. They have unique bar codes per voter on the outer envelopes, too boot.

Fantastic question....hell, we have already talked about this. You don't need a full audit....just a handful of basic numbers would tell the story.

• How many ballots were requested by MCBE?
• How many did you match and ship based on the voter data you were provided?
• How many did you mail out?
• How many were returned?
• How many that were returned passed validation and were sent to MCBE as good/no issues?
• How many that were returned failed validation?
• Of those which failed, how many were sent to MCBE?

That should take someone at Runbeck about 10 minutes to pull together and send. All you have to do then is look at the numbers sent by Runbeck and look at what MCBE gave as mail-in total......Then make MCBE explain why (1) those numbers don't match, and (2) where ALL the extras came from.

We fixed the keg said:

---

Fantastic question....hell, we have already talked about this. You don't need a full audit....just a handful of basic numbers would tell the story.

• How many ballots were requested by MCBE?
• How many did you match and ship based on the voter data you were provided?
• How many did you mail out?
• How many were returned?
• How many that were returned passed validation and were sent to MCBE as good/no issues?
• How many that were returned failed validation?
• Of those which failed, how many were sent to MCBE?

That should take someone at Runbeck about 10 minutes to pull together and send. All you have to do then is look at the numbers sent by Runbeck and look at what MCBE gave as mail-in total......Then make MCBE explain why (1) those numbers don't match, and (2) where ALL the extras came from.

---

Maybe a little longer than ten minutes, but not much. Also, I have to wonder if election service providers are also subject to the 22 month retention rules? I would imagine their contracts have such a stipulation, or they should be insisted upon by the state entities with whom they do business.

OTOH, those same contracts could restrict Runbeck from providing such information to anyone other than the client. Which means the NDA would have to be voided by compulsory process, i.e. court ordered subpoenas.

(N.B. Just because the state Senate issued the subpoenas a court subsequently upheld them as valid. Thus they are court sanctioned for purposes of voiding the NDA.)

Which leads me to the fact MCBE has more than likely been in possession of this data in real time. Can you imagine a contract existing where Runbeck wouldn't have been asked, or offered, we will provide you a batch by batch count per order and then a final accounting once the last batch has been received?

We fixed the keg said:

---

Which leads me to the fact MCBE has more than likely been in possession of this data in real time. Can you imagine a contract existing where Runbeck wouldn't have been asked, or offered, we will provide you a batch by batch count per order and then a final accounting once the last batch has been received?

---

In Maricopa County, according to Jan Bryant, the supervisors at the counting center never had that info because she kept asking after they thought they were done counting only to have more ballots show up overnight from Runbeck day after day.

So maybe the Board of Supervisors might know but that info didn't filter down to their people running the counting center.

Yet another reason to have decentralized counting at the precinct level, and then passed to the county. Provides an paper audit trail down to the precinct level.

good lord.....

will25u said:

---

Nearly 400,000 voter identities processed in Arizona have NO MATCH with Social Security Administration 🚨https://t.co/56sA3I9JXD

— RSBN 🇺🇸 (@RSBNetwork) September 21, 2021

---

Word spreading, you posted another link to this back on the 19th. I hope more and more websites post this information. If true Arizona has a huge problem, almost 400,000 records not matching Social Security records.

Hopefully an audit verifies this information.

edit spelling

Is this the Kraken?

oh no said:

---

txags92 said:

---

Is this the Kraken?

---

Just like all the covid fear mongering changing the election laws and processes to allow for easy fraud, the tech monopolies censoring proof of corruption before the election, the seemingly impossible data anomalies in the election results, thousands of sworn affidavits form witnesses that were ignored, observers being kicked out, windows being blocked, fake water main bursts, restart counting in the wee hours once needs were known, etc., this group's GPS data around the drop boxes is just more evidence that the left will continue to ignore and over which the mainstream media will continue to have zero journalistic curiosity or integrity. The upcoming AZ forensic audit report will be the same. No amount of proof will open the TDS brainwashed eyes. Their Marxist leaders have already completed their coup d'etat and they dgaf what their political opponents or anyone who is skeptical or asks questions have to say about it.

---

That is my fear. I have long since been convinced that the election was stolen and Trump won. But I am more just tired of the "BOMBSHELL!!1!!!11eleventy!!" headlines about each new news release that somebody somewhere might have found something blah blah blah. I agree, it is all great evidence that should be convincing people that they are being lied to by the media, but reality is that it isn't going to happen until it gets a day in court and an impartial judge actually lets a case be heard on the merits. Just tired of all the ZOMG! headlines...

txags92 said:

---

oh no said:

---

txags92 said:

---

Is this the Kraken?

---

Just like all the covid fear mongering changing the election laws and processes to allow for easy fraud, the tech monopolies censoring proof of corruption before the election, the seemingly impossible data anomalies in the election results, thousands of sworn affidavits form witnesses that were ignored, observers being kicked out, windows being blocked, fake water main bursts, restart counting in the wee hours once needs were known, etc., this group's GPS data around the drop boxes is just more evidence that the left will continue to ignore and over which the mainstream media will continue to have zero journalistic curiosity or integrity. The upcoming AZ forensic audit report will be the same. No amount of proof will open the TDS brainwashed eyes. Their Marxist leaders have already completed their coup d'etat and they dgaf what their political opponents or anyone who is skeptical or asks questions have to say about it.

---

That is my fear. I have long since been convinced that the election was stolen and Trump won. But I am more just tired of the "BOMBSHELL!!1!!!11eleventy!!" headlines about each new news release that somebody somewhere might have found something blah blah blah. I agree, it is all great evidence that should be convincing people that they are being lied to by the media, but reality is that it isn't going to happen until it gets a day in court and an impartial judge actually lets a case be heard on the merits. Just tired of all the ZOMG! headlines...

---

That is so true.

However, am content with knowing it was certainly rigged going into Nov 3in the same sense of the Ron Paul coverage and reporting and other precedents, and in the selective coverage with emphasis of anti-Trump and and spiking of stories exposing Biden's criminal family structure and dealings. Chris Wallace's shiilling for Biden in the first debate, with a "conservative' network thus sandbagging President Trump (a covid sick one even, but unknown at the time) was another such proof, especially two weeks after Gingrich being silenced warning about the Soros DAs sabotaging things. And that is not even getting into the obviously political way that covid was used, or the riots of summer 2020 backed by the Democrats and press to create a "we want change" psychology on the part of voters.

All that adds up to `rigged' even if so far falling short (for the moment) of some smoking gun proof of "stolen" the morning of November he 4th and days after.