dubi said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

Is this too late to help?

---

MooreTrucker said:

---

agcrock2005 said:

---

Agvet12 said:

---

yukmonkey said:

---

All of the activity in last 48 hours has been daily significant.

---

Agreed the last 12 hrs has been some more prominent news, maybe it's the fact that they have better evidence now to back up the claims? Hopefully more fireworks to come

I think PA to Alito will cause a significant ripple, add in the rest and the charade will come crashing down

---

I have long thought this but I'm getting worried we are running out of time. Hopefully some more fireworks this weekend that MSM is forced to cover.

---

Nope. Enough happening now to probably delay the EC on 12/14. Plus the real deadline is mid-January.

---

vette said:

---

So when do we actually see something happening that causes the left/media? All this just seems to be talk/smoke (which I believe). Basically, when does the first legit domino fall?

---

titan said:

---

vette said:

---

So when do we actually see something happening that causes the left/media? All this just seems to be talk/smoke (which I believe). Basically, when does the first legit domino fall?

---

What does that mean? Looks like a word left out --causes the left/media to --do what? Repent and tell the truth? Not very likely.

On the other, the electoral college vote on Dec 14tth can be delayed till the Jan 6th Congress session? Didn't know that.

---

Quote:

---

The authoritative research paper breaks down the history of Electoral College deadlines and makes clear that this election's December 8 and December 14 deadlines for the selection of Electors, the assembly of the Electoral College, and the tallying of its votes, respectively, are not only elements of of a 72-year old federal statute with zero Constitutional basis, but are also actively preventing the states from fulfilling their constitutional and ethical obligation to hold free and fair elections. Experts believe that the primary basis for these dates was to provide enough time to affect the presidential transition of power, a concern which is fully obsolete in the age of internet and air travel.

The white paper also shows that the December 8 "safe harbor" deadline for appointing presidential Electors does not apply to states where flagrant violations of state election laws affected the outcome of the popular vote. In fact, the only Constitutionally-set date in the election process is the assumption of office by the President on January 20.

The Amistad Project has filed litigation in several key swing states arguing that illegal conduct by state and local officials led to more than 1.2 million potentially fraudulent ballots, including illegal votes that were counted and legal votes that were not counted. In each state, the number of potentially fraudulent ballots far exceeds the margin separating the leading presidential candidate.

"Through rigorous investigations supporting our litigation, we demonstrate that state and local officials brazenly violated election laws in several swing states in order to advance a partisan political agenda," said Phill Kline, Director of The Amistad Project. "As a result, it is impossible for those states to determine their presidential Electors in line with the arbitrary deadline set forth via federal statute in 1948, and thus, the only deadline that matters is January 20, 2021."

Although federal law sets December 8, 2020 as the date on which determinations of Electors made pursuant to state election law automatically become official, the law does not require Electors to be designated by that date in order to be counted. Because the U.S. Constitution places ultimate authority for designating presidential Electors in the hands of state legislatures, it is the responsibility of the people's elected representatives to judge the relevant facts and appoint an appropriate slate of Electors, subject only to the sole deadline set forth in the U.S. Constitution 12:00 noon on January 20, 2021.

---

M-K-TAG said:

---

Thanks... Yep another Hail Mary unfortunately.

---

Quote:

---

[url=https://twitter.com/MagaFarley][/url]MagaFarley

@MagaFarley

[url=https://twitter.com/MagaFarley][/url]
THREAD:

What if I can prove
@KLoeffler
has direct financial ties to China, doing just a simple open source dive into her recent past?

It's pretty obvious...follow along:

---

SexyAg said:

---

---

Cepe said:

---

will25u said:

---

---

Note that everyone in the media thought Texas was going blue. Carried it blue most of the night and then refused to call it for Trump.

Also note the week before the election the Chinese consulate in Houston was shut down and they burned "papers" in the courtyard.

https://abc13.com/fire-chinese-consulate-documents-being-burned-houston-us-and-china-tensions/6328284/

I have seen it speculated that Texas was going to be like these other states where the big blue cities come in late with a ballot dump and swing the state. I have also seen it speculated that these ballots were hidden under the protection of the Chinese consulates until Election Day.

Who knows if true but it all stinks.

---

Pinche Abogado said:

---

It is a big deal. Ignore the gaslighting commies.

---

SexyAg said:

---

---

Quote:

---

Are you literally you making **** up? That consulate thing happened in July.

---

will25u said:

---

---

Quote:

---

Response to application (20A98) requested by Justice Alito, due Tuesday, December 8, by 9 a.m. (docket entry updated 12/6/20)

---