SpaceX and other space news updates

1,360,656 Views | 15419 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by Ag87H2O
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Musk tweeted nominal landing.
A is A
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mathguy64 said:

Musk tweeted nominal landing.
I'm ready to ride.
RED AG 98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Awesome! High 5s everyone!
"Freedom is never more than one election away from extinction"
Fight! Fight! Fight!
Centerpole90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wow. Like a feather.
Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Now the $64k question. Will they fly 15 a second time or trot out 16?
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Was watching on a different feed and unless one rocket shut down at the very last second, it landed on two Raptors.

Beautiful sight to see. Absolutely amazing.
bthotugigem05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Looked so great. Never had so many been rooting for a (probably massive but) dinky-looking water cannon.
Marvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Whoop! Keep it up SpaceX!
double aught
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Do it again!
bthotugigem05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rdunham98 said:

IP address on the stream is great
I wonder how many people hit those immediately
Not a Bot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Everyday Astronaut had great footage.
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PJYoung said:

Several YouTube streams with the SpaceX stream

https://viewsync.net/watch?v=NPNvB5ComFw&t=0&v=htnG_mABtSQ&t=0&v=sTA0GTgFn5E&t=6466797.01&v=sMC5KonXCfg&t=323464.39&v=z9eoubnO-pE&t=0&mode=solo
Thanks for posting that, cool site!
Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What a flight, what a landing. Can't wait to see it stack!
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes! I missed it but yes!!!!
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mathguy64 said:

Fire seems out and it's venting heavily


Mathguy64
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's like they drove into Edinburg one afternoon and raided the irrigation section at McCoys.
Not a Bot
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Almost missed the pad.
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:




Only catching on fire is definitely an improvement on exploding. I think they'll nail it on 16.
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Huge step forward for space technology and capability.

Just a little chuckle to myself here. Bezos challenges the HLS contract, in two years Elon calls up NASA and tells them we're getting ready to put some paint on the booster, you want your name on it? $3 billion, bring your own paint
double aught
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


The way those engines gimbal to keep it stable seems so unstable.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Now that SpaceX has recovered their Starship in tact, I'm hoping they'll be able to upload some video from their on-board cameras for us.
"Freedom is never more than one election away from extinction"
Fight! Fight! Fight!
Rice and Fries
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kenneth_2003 said:

Huge step forward for space technology and capability.

Just a little chuckle to myself here. Bezos challenges the HLS contract, in two years Elon calls up NASA and tells them we're getting ready to put some paint on the booster, you want your name on it? $3 billion, bring your own paint


You just know that Jeff Bezos locked himself in his 20 car garage and took a golf club or whatever to one of his "super limited edition/only 4 of these cars ever made in the world Lamborghini's" because Elon Musk keeps dunking on him with these crazy accomplishments while his space company can't even get it up (to orbit)
Ag_of_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
double aught said:

will25u said:


The way those engines gimbal to keep it stable seems so unstable.


Think that was more gimbling to translate than stabalize, it looks like they missed the mark by a few feet, possible an issue with not arresting as much cross range as they expected too.

Except for the fire afterwards, which I'm not sure wasn't intentional, these engines and the system I think prove they weren't kidding about the better grasp on the situation ...
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maximus_Meridius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kenneth_2003 said:

Huge step forward for space technology and capability.

Just a little chuckle to myself here. Bezos challenges the HLS contract, in two years Elon calls up NASA and tells them we're getting ready to put some paint on the booster, you want your name on it? $3 billion, bring your own paint
What I really wish Elon would do (he won't), is basically tweet:

"Hey Jeff, seeing as you're so confident you're better than us, and we both have stupid amounts of money, how about a little race to the moon? First one there gets NASA's contract! Loser has to kick in an extra million if the winner lands by 2024."

I watched it land, and the whole time I was expecting an explosion. When it didn't, I kinda sat there with a "Huh, they actually did it" kinda look on my face. I'm not really surprised per se, I knew they would eventually, I just didn't think SN15 would be the one. Kinda figured it'd be 16 or 17. I think they'll stand down for a week to do any inspections they want, move 15 around or whatever, which will give them more time to work uninterrupted on the Orbital Launch Pad and supporting structures, because those are now the pacing items. You can't test SH, and you can't go orbital until you get all of that infrastructure done.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was wondering how they expect to use starship as a lunar lander along with SLS. And I found this:


Quote:

The plan calls for NASA to send four astronauts aboard the Lockheed Martin-built Orion spacecraft on a multi-day journey to the moon's orbit. Then two crew members will transfer to SpaceX's lander for their descent to the lunar surface. After a week exploring the moon, they'll board the lander to return to Orion and head back to Earth.
That sounds asinine. So they are going to use a 100% reusable rocket to get a huge lander in lunar orbit. Then spend $2B to fly a small Orion to meet up with the huge lander. Transfer people, and then land?
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In my view if Starship is going to the moon, going to land, and then come back, there is ZERO point in continuing SLS or Orion development. This, in my view, was nothing but pork projects to constituencies from the beginning. Why set a goal of returning to the moon then design a lunar capsule based system that can only just barely get into lunar orbit and back?

But too many congress critters with contracts in their districts to shelve that boondoggle.
aTmAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It would be hilarious if Musk personally welcomes the Orion astronauts as they ferry across to Starship (after having been on the moon for a year or so).
bthotugigem05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think Musk will be part of the first group of people who go to Mars and I'd be surprised if he ever came back.
Malachi Constant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I had a good feeling about SN15 for whatever reason, so I wasn't so surprised that it landed. I think the big thing here is they can evaluate the three raptors more closely since they didn't explode this time.

Regarding Bezos, he's got to have the biggest case of professional jealousy of all time. That dork tweeted out about how the New Shepherd was the first booster landing like it was some big accomplishment. Since then, it seems like BO has done absolutely zero in terms of advancement.

And yeah, I hear all the time "Blue Origin does stuff behind closed doors, they're making lots of progress, etc." but we simply haven't seen anything except schedule delays.
Kenneth_2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When Blue Origin landed New Shepard that was a huge accomplishment and certainly nothing to be ashamed of. At that time neither company had put an object into orbit. Bezos and Elon do have (or have had) something of an ongoing professional pissing match, but Bezos' team certainly beat SpaceX in that regard.

Eventually the SpaceX folks surpassed him though and since then, they haven't looked back.
Malachi Constant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kenneth_2003 said:

When Blue Origin landed New Shepard that was a huge accomplishment and certainly nothing to be ashamed of. At that time neither company had put an object into orbit. Bezos and Elon do have (or have had) something of an ongoing professional pissing match, but Bezos' team certainly beat SpaceX in that regard.

Eventually the SpaceX folks surpassed him though and since then, they haven't looked back.
"I'm not sure that's correct" / Norm Hitzgis
Malachi Constant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
[SpaceX] 28 September 2008 First privately funded fully liquid-fueled rocket to reach orbit. Falcon 1 flight 4

[SpaceX] 14 July 2009 First privately developed liquid-fueled rocket to put a commercial satellite in orbit. RazakSAT on Falcon 1 flight 5

[Blue Origin] 23 November 2015 NS2 100.535 km (62.4695 mi)[url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Shepard#cite_note-bbc-7][7] Success[/url] Sub-orbital spaceflight and landing.

[SpaceX] 22 December 2015 First landing of an orbital-class rocket's first stage on land. Falcon B1019 on Orbcomm OG2 M2
First Page Last Page
Page 68 of 441
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.