SpaceX and other space news updates

2,385,456 Views | 21475 Replies | Last: 55 min ago by PJYoung
Jock 07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Keep the chicoms and the soviets away
ABATTBQ11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Think they'll have a good idea after this. Seemed ok from what we could see, and that's what they were really focusing on. They may also get a first hand look or be able to recover the whole ship for inspection.

I hope they go orbital for 14. Would be awesome.
normaleagle05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maximus_Meridius said:

They might go orbital but I doubt they go for the Gulf of America until they prove the heat shield survives that reentry profile

I don't think there's anything substantially different about reentry into the Gulf or the chopsticks than what they've been doing with the ship. Every ship that's made it to reentry has had a basically nominal splashdown right where it was supposed to.

After watching this one I'm expecting a ship catch before a V3 booster catch.
Decay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wonder if they intentionally made the water landing mushier. It seemed to splash much more gently... More sliding into the water instead of tipping over flat onto the water surface.

Whatever the case, it blew my mind to see the intact ship. Now they just have to figure out that dang booster landing
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
normaleagle05 said:

Maximus_Meridius said:

They might go orbital but I doubt they go for the Gulf of America until they prove the heat shield survives that reentry profile

I don't think there's anything substantially different about reentry into the Gulf or the chopsticks than what they've been doing with the ship. Every ship that's made it to reentry has had a basically nominal splashdown right where it was supposed to.

After watching this one I'm expecting a ship catch before a V3 booster catch.

I think they will want to do an orbital flight with full and accurate deorbit burn before they try to do a ship catch. I suspect the next flight will be orbital with a GOM ship splashdown. If ship nails that they will go for catch on 15. If they also get a proper booster relight and splashdown on 14, they will have an interesting decision on their hands for flight 15.
Sweep4-2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We were in the same area. First time seeing a launch and it was great!! We spent time Wednesday on Boca Chica beach right on the Rio Grande and couldn't believe how close we could get to the facility.
Consistency: It's only a virtue if you're not a screw-up.
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Accelerate!

.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
hph6203 said:

Accelerate!



No, I don't care what CNN or Miss NOW said this time
Ad Lunam
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


He also said the booster impacted at less than 100 mph, if they had another 200m it would've stopped before impact.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

- Abraham Lincoln
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:



That's ship as seen from the booster.
No, I don't care what CNN or Miss NOW said this time
Ad Lunam
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How did the footage get to you?
.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The earth rotates about 15 degrees per hour or 22.5 degrees every orbit making a catch after an abort once around orbit unlikely.

So that means it would have to do 16 orbits and then would be in position to return 24 hrs after launch.
No, I don't care what CNN or Miss NOW said this time
Ad Lunam
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Quote:

Megabay killed it last weekend, thank you folks for being awesome.

Great flight 13 for both Booster 20 and Starship 40, which finished its mission floating intact in the Indian Ocean (a first as we've previously lost the nose on slapdown after water landings).

Really critical data collected this mission on a demonstration deorbit burn for Raptor, and a first flight for the next generation Starlink satellites. It feels like we are ready to kick into gear on delivering payload to orbit, which I am very excited for. Development vehicles are fun but at the end of the day, we are here to put things into space and I am psyched about this rocket's game changing capabilities.

TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
hph6203 said:

How did the footage get to you?


Via SpaceX's live stream. The satellites were released in the dark side. Ships engines are lit. And the moon wasn't in that position when the satellites were released.

Plus, that is clearly the booster seen in the video
No, I don't care what CNN or Miss NOW said this time
Ad Lunam
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Quote:

PS, asking for constant updates is pointless. It's a four thousand ton vessel. It's not going anywhere quick lol. If something important happens I post as rapidly as I can

Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TexAgs91 said:

will25u said:



That's ship as seen from the booster.

Very cool shot. Just before Starship goes out of sight, it looks like the exhaust blast from the booster sweeps across it.
"Well, doctor, what have we got, a republic or a monarchy?" "A republic, if you can keep it" - Benjamin Franklin
hph6203
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How did the footage get to the SpaceX livestream?
.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
hph6203 said:

How did the footage get to the SpaceX livestream?
that's an open question as the starlink terminal was underwater. Maybe some wifi comms as Manley said they kept broadcasting location for several hours.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

hph6203 said:

How did the footage get to the SpaceX livestream?

that's an open question as the starlink terminal was underwater. Maybe some wifi comms as Manley said they kept broadcasting location for several hours.

There's two locations on ship so they had that covered.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
hph6203 said:

How did the footage get to the SpaceX livestream?


He said "as SEEN from Starlink satellites"
No, I don't care what CNN or Miss NOW said this time
Ad Lunam
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
First Page Refresh
Page 614 of 614
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.