That's the way I handle it because Publix is so close, and tomorrow is going to be my yearlyQuote:
only grocery shop a few days at a time
That's the way I handle it because Publix is so close, and tomorrow is going to be my yearlyQuote:
only grocery shop a few days at a time
Those videos have been debunked. From 70,000 case Chinese study, no one under the age of 9 died.Rock1982 said:74OA said:There was also early reporting that young children seem to have some sort of innate resistance. Anything further on that?aezmvp said:So far but again getting reliable data has been difficult. As we see the spiraling cases in SKorea, Japan, and Italy I think we'll get a much better feeling for the data. I would suspect you'll also see a very high correlation of malnutrition to deaths in places like Iran, Pakistan, Africa and so forth as well.74OA said:
Again: Is the early data still holding up indicating that the vast majority of deaths are the elderly and those with preexisting medical conditions?
Does not appear that children have an innate immunity, but the sample size is still too small to know the true risks. We will know much more about mortality / critical illness rates in about one month (once ROK, Japan, and Italy report). We also have our group of Americans with the disease, so hopefully they will all survive and the picture will not be so grim. China is lying about everything, hence the delay.
Sadly we have seen children who have passed in videos.
If so, surely that's of high interest to those seeking to understand the virus?VaultingChemist said:Those videos have been debunked. From 70,000 case Chinese study, no one under the age of 9 died.Rock1982 said:74OA said:There was also early reporting that young children seem to have some sort of innate resistance. Anything further on that?aezmvp said:So far but again getting reliable data has been difficult. As we see the spiraling cases in SKorea, Japan, and Italy I think we'll get a much better feeling for the data. I would suspect you'll also see a very high correlation of malnutrition to deaths in places like Iran, Pakistan, Africa and so forth as well.74OA said:
Again: Is the early data still holding up indicating that the vast majority of deaths are the elderly and those with preexisting medical conditions?
Does not appear that children have an innate immunity, but the sample size is still too small to know the true risks. We will know much more about mortality / critical illness rates in about one month (once ROK, Japan, and Italy report). We also have our group of Americans with the disease, so hopefully they will all survive and the picture will not be so grim. China is lying about everything, hence the delay.
Sadly we have seen children who have passed in videos.
Quote:
A senior health official at the forefront of South Korea's fight against Covid-19 has tested positive for the coronavirus and identified himself as a member of the religious cult linked to hundreds of other cases.
The official, whose name has been kept from the public, is the head of the Infection Preventive Medicine Department in the western district of Daegu City, which is at the epicentre of the outbreak in South Korea.
I highly doubt that any infection number here are reliable at all. I suspect that children are fighting off the disease at a higher rate depending on exposure. We have seen videos leak of multiple children being loaded into a single body bag in China. So is the risk 0? No I very highly doubt it. But I suspect in industrialized countries with specialized children's supportive care and high nutritional standards most kids will be better off from what we can guess from the statistics. Of course that really is only a guess, the cruise ship which is the biggest cluster of cases outside of China is going to skew significantly older. I'd keep an eye on Italy and especially the church in Korea. If a bunch of kids come down with it there that's your canary watch so to speak.74OA said:There was also early reporting that young children seem to have some sort of innate resistance. Anything further on that?aezmvp said:So far but again getting reliable data has been difficult. As we see the spiraling cases in SKorea, Japan, and Italy I think we'll get a much better feeling for the data. I would suspect you'll also see a very high correlation of malnutrition to deaths in places like Iran, Pakistan, Africa and so forth as well.74OA said:
Again: Is the early data still holding up indicating that the vast majority of deaths are the elderly and those with preexisting medical conditions?
The US has only tested 414? Does that have more to do with a lower number of suspected cases or are we having a much harder time testing for it than, say, the UK?PJYoung said:Quote:
Total number of people tested in each country
So far
South Korea: 21,135
UK: 6,539
Hong Kong: 1,589
Canada: 464
USA: 414
And the fact that we've tested less than Canada tells you a lot.BowSowy said:The US has only tested 414? Does that have more to do with a lower number of suspected cases or are we having a much harder time testing for it than, say, the UK?PJYoung said:Quote:
Total number of people tested in each country
So far
South Korea: 21,135
UK: 6,539
Hong Kong: 1,589
Canada: 464
USA: 414
aezmvp said:And the fact that we've tested less than Canada tells you a lot.BowSowy said:The US has only tested 414? Does that have more to do with a lower number of suspected cases or are we having a much harder time testing for it than, say, the UK?PJYoung said:Quote:
Total number of people tested in each country
So far
South Korea: 21,135
UK: 6,539
Hong Kong: 1,589
Canada: 464
USA: 414
CDC doesn't want to test. They can say whatever they want but they're slow playing things.BowSowy said:The US has only tested 414? Does that have more to do with a lower number of suspected cases or are we having a much harder time testing for it than, say, the UK?PJYoung said:Quote:
Total number of people tested in each country
So far
South Korea: 21,135
UK: 6,539
Hong Kong: 1,589
Canada: 464
USA: 414
Keep in mind, that was just point of treatment test kits.VaultingChemist said:
Our original test kits (15,000 tests capability) had faulty reagents.
If it was running rampant around the US, we'd see far more people being sick enough to be placed on ventilators, unless it only does that to Asians. Keeping that a secret would be impossible.wessimo said:aezmvp said:And the fact that we've tested less than Canada tells you a lot.BowSowy said:The US has only tested 414? Does that have more to do with a lower number of suspected cases or are we having a much harder time testing for it than, say, the UK?PJYoung said:Quote:
Total number of people tested in each country
So far
South Korea: 21,135
UK: 6,539
Hong Kong: 1,589
Canada: 464
USA: 414
It is crazy that only 400 tests have been run in the US. Definitely opens up the possibility that it is spreading here undetected.
Most likely he was looking at it along with numerous other resources.Mr.Infectious said:
This can't be true....somebody debunk this please...
GeorgiAg said:
Bernie and Coronavirus. We're so screwed.
Rapier108 said:Most likely he was looking at it along with numerous other resources.Mr.Infectious said:
This can't be true....somebody debunk this please...
When it comes to something like this, I tend to believe the most obvious explanation.Mr.Infectious said:Rapier108 said:Most likely he was looking at it along with numerous other resources.Mr.Infectious said:
This can't be true....somebody debunk this please...
You have a lot more faith in our bloated, corrupt, and incompetent Government than I do.....
Remember this gem......"Brownie, You're doing a heck of a job"