Did the suspected cases go way down with the new criteria change? I had assumed most of these new clinical cases were "suspected"
claym711 said:
This thread.
The doomsdayers say told ya so.
The deniers say 14k new cases, nbd.
Shanked Punt said:
We have dodgy data made even dodgier when the standard of what constitutes a new case changes.
Comparison of Swine Flu, SARS, and nCoV epidemicsclaym711 said:
What were H1N1s results when there was no herd immunity, vaccines, or antivirals designed for it?
Big Al 1992 said:VaultingChemist said:Cases increased by a third in one day! Hope that's a typo.KorbinDallas said:
Holy F____!
I think this is a lot like election results - the votes are out there they just haven't been reported. The cases are out there, they just haven't come in from various regions. That's assuming they are being reported accurately in the first place. Those following this are assuming there's 5x more than have been reported - if that number gets reported, was there a sudden spike in infected People or were they out there all along and just got counted.
foleyt said:
Did the suspected cases go way down with the new criteria change? I had assumed most of these new clinical cases were "suspected"
When a major out break happens in your county?Tx-Ag2010 said:
So... When do I need to start wearing my PAPR for more than metal dust protection.
Short summaries from a couple of financial professionals and their outlook on the Coronavirus:Rapier108 said:Reading it would take too much effort. Many would just rather read a headline which predicts doomsday.Quote:
Nice data to have. Everyone should take time to actually read the discussion part of the paper.
Hell, some seem to be ecstatic every time there is a new case and death update and are sitting at their computer with Twitter open and jackhammering the F5 key.
Quote:
And it's hot and humid there so maybe that will have an effect.
Eliminatus said:
Have been wondering how far the Chinese gubment can truly go on their lying. With today's tech, it is almost impossible to lock EVERYTHING down. Such as these leaked videos. Sounds like may they have reached a point where fudging the numbers is no longer feasible with the amount of info making it out of the truth. I guarantee every single video we have seen here, has also been seen by the Chinese and when there is enough smoke, even the dumbest person will ask questions. So maybe trying to slowly expand to truer figures so it won't be as blatant when the final tallies come out. When and if they ever do.
Just spitballing a scenario in the rise of numbers we see here.
Premium said:Eliminatus said:
Have been wondering how far the Chinese gubment can truly go on their lying. With today's tech, it is almost impossible to lock EVERYTHING down. Such as these leaked videos. Sounds like may they have reached a point where fudging the numbers is no longer feasible with the amount of info making it out of the truth. I guarantee every single video we have seen here, has also been seen by the Chinese and when there is enough smoke, even the dumbest person will ask questions. So maybe trying to slowly expand to truer figures so it won't be as blatant when the final tallies come out. When and if they ever do.
Just spitballing a scenario in the rise of numbers we see here.
As fake as videos have become (even lack of context or proof of time and location) I'm just as likely to not believe a video or picture as I am the Chinese gov. Sad but true.
Because 99% of the cases originate there...just a thought.Beat40 said:
Outside of economic impact, why is this thread still so focused on China?
And Jets fly at 500+. Its a pond.coastsrs said:
Love we have the biggest ocean separating us and them
ttu_85 said:IF you catch it and survive you have antibodies. Re-exposure would not matter in that case unless the virus mutated. Highly unlikelyJJMt said:She may have been re-exposed after the earlier tests.Nuclear Scramjet said:
Yeah this isn't a good sign for the tests.
Different strains of flu. Very hard to get the same strain twice in the same season. This thing is totally new though it has relatives.Tx-Ag2010 said:ttu_85 said:IF you catch it and survive you have antibodies. Re-exposure would not matter in that case unless the virus mutated. Highly unlikelyJJMt said:She may have been re-exposed after the earlier tests.Nuclear Scramjet said:
Yeah this isn't a good sign for the tests.
If only people got the flu once...
RNA viruses mutates easily and often quickly. We don't know if this is RNA or DNA.ttu_85 said:IF you catch it and survive you have antibodies. Re-exposure would not matter in that case unless the virus mutated. Highly unlikelyJJMt said:She may have been re-exposed after the earlier tests.Nuclear Scramjet said:
Yeah this isn't a good sign for the tests.