daggertx said:
In that articles he goes over 4 options:
Option 1. Natural coronavirus related to bat coronaviruses, Not a Recombined Virus.
Option 2. A recombined virus that naturally picked up a SARS-like spike protein in it N-terminus (3 end) of the viral genome.
Option 3. A recombined virus made in a laboratory for the purpose of creating a bioweapon.
Option 4. A recombined virus made in a laboratory for the purpose of creating a vaccine.
The very researchers conducting studies on SARS vaccines have cautioned repeatedly against human trials;
https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2020/01/30/on-the-origins-of-the-2019-ncov-virus-wuhan-china/?fbclid=IwAR1GhqPaTesAA0R9G2iDqByXQtiedeJQ35AhZ-YzhJurbz1exr8q31Oa2kE
Very interesting article. If I'm understanding correctly, the author is arguing that this has a high likelihood to be a strain that escaped from the lab that was aimed to be a corona virus vaccine. What's even more interesting is he is saying the tests where this vaccine was applied to animals that already the SARS vaccine, this strain actually made them sicker and caused respiratory failure in older lab animals. Animals that didn't have the SARS vaccine did not experience as severe of symptoms.
So essentially if you're Chinese and received a sars vaccine the severity of this strain if infected could cause you to get sick or sicker, ie you're more susceptible to getting sick if you had the SARS vaccine as this would act as a "re infection".
I'm kind of bouncing on and off this thread, but that may also make some sense of the infection rates where it seems to be it's plowing right through China yet there seems to be very little growth in infections in other countries.