riverrataggie said:KidDoc said:That is a good point but, from the current cases and evidence of temporary hospitals in China, this is not a 2-3 day illness. Most of the hospitalized patients seem to stay > 10 days which is a LONG hospital stay for a virus.SoupNazi2001 said:KidDoc said:
This is a well written article about what to really be worried about once Coronavirus breaks out.
https://medium.com/@amwren/forget-about-the-death-rate-this-is-why-you-should-be-worried-about-the-coronavirus-890fbf9c4de6
Not enough beds in hospital or ICU in any country.
I fully expect to get it but I'm not worried as I'm middle aged and healthy. The burden on the medical system is going to be a significant challenge.
The author uses UK as an example but it is no better here. You cannot have tons of empty hospital beds and staffing sitting around just in case a novel pandemic happens. I would love to know how the temp new hospitals in China are doing.
------------------snip ------------------------
We think the virus might be much more infectious than the flu, but let's assume that only 8% of the UK population gets infected, the same as a severe flu season.
The UK population is 67 million people, that's 5.4 million infected.
Currents predictions are that 80% of the cases will be mild.
If 20% of those people require hospitalization for 36 weeks?
That's 1,086,176 People.
Do you know how many beds the NHS has?
140,000
--------------- snip ------------------------------------------
The problem with these kind of articles is they always assume everyone will get it at the same time. Obviously it will be spread out.
It will be interesting to see if home O2 will be more utilized as hospital beds start to run out.
I've been curious about the length of hospital stay, were they staying for quarantine and had symptoms or that they were truly needing it?
source: https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2002032