No one gives a ****, because the request for the investigation was predicated on legitimate concerns. There's nothing you can say or do to change that. If it was started on legitimate concerns of corruption, the argument that the investigation was purely politically motivated is not possibly true. This was a pathetic attempt by Dems at throwing **** against the wall to see what sticks. They promised the day he was elected to impeach him and this was the best excuse they could come up with to take that purely partisan political action. You fell for their unbelievably weak narratives hook line and sinker to the point of derangement. Seek help before you hurt yourself or someone else. This is not healthy and we're concerned for you. I mean seriously take a step back and take a look at who you're choosing to believe. Taking the word of a Democrat seriously shows a serious lack of personal judgement and should make you question your sanity.John Maplethorpe said:Quote:
Paoletta wrote in an early December 2019 letter to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), explaining in bureaucratese that the Pentagon's legal affairs division simply had not expressed any concerns about the legality of the White House's Ukraine aid hold.
But Paoletta was simply lying.
A late August email from DOD Deputy Principle General Counsel Edwin "Scott" Castle expresses the Pentagon's concerns about exactly that. Castle's email also carbon copied DOD General Counsel Paul Neydestroying any plausible OMB defense that the full chain of command was not apprised.
Again, the originally-released version of this email was redacted to the point of meaninglessness.
They had to go back to court to fight the redactions, new documents produced with a few redactions removed, back to court, redactions, back to court, rinse, repeat.
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/new-ukraine-emails-prove-white-house-lied-to-congressional-investigators/