***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****

963,573 Views | 9220 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Pizza
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


18 witnesses, but Schiff refuses to release the transcript because it would be devastating to his narrative.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Need to resurrect this thread for a minute. But it is for a great reason!!!

agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
See ya. Surprised you still had a job.
The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you never know if they are genuine. -- Abraham Lincoln.

Elko is a loser and we will be buying him out for some obscene amount of money in two years. - Agsalaska

captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
John Maplethorpe said:

Quote:


In Private, Republicans Admit They Acquitted Trump Out of Fear
By Sherrod Brown

In private, many of my colleagues agree that the president is reckless and unfit. They admit his lies. And they acknowledge what he did was wrong. They know this president has done things Richard Nixon never did. And they know that more damning evidence is likely to come out.

They are afraid that Mr. Trump might give them a nickname like "Low Energy Jeb" and "Lyin' Ted," or that he might tweet about their disloyalty. Or worst of all that he might come to their state to campaign against them in the Republican primary.



https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/05/opinion/trump-senate-acquittal-impeachment.amp.html
Why don't you just post an anecdote from Cryin' Chuck?
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aginlakeway said:

John Maplethorpe said:

Quote:


In Private, Republicans Admit They Acquitted Trump Out of Fear
By Sherrod Brown

In private, many of my colleagues agree that the president is reckless and unfit. They admit his lies. And they acknowledge what he did was wrong. They know this president has done things Richard Nixon never did. And they know that more damning evidence is likely to come out.

They are afraid that Mr. Trump might give them a nickname like "Low Energy Jeb" and "Lyin' Ted," or that he might tweet about their disloyalty. Or worst of all that he might come to their state to campaign against them in the Republican primary.



https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/05/opinion/trump-senate-acquittal-impeachment.amp.html




Sidenote ...

EVERY prediction you made about the impeachment and Trump leaving office was wrong. EVERY one.

You said he would be out of office in a few weeks. And that more than 50 senators would vote for removal. The list of your failed predictions is long.

So why do you think that is? Why are all of your predictions wrong?

Any ideas?
He keeps posting and believing Fake News
aggiedaniel06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't know if this has been posted yet but did y'all notice that the republicans in the crowd looked healthy and in decent shape. The democrats all looked like they took a bus from a retirement home. They looked so unhealthy and sloppy.

Also, Pence looked fit as a fiddle!
TexasAggie_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiedaniel06 said:

I don't know if this has been posted yet but did y'all notice that the republicans in the crowd looked healthy and in decent shape. The democrats all looked like they took a bus from a retirement home. They looked so unhealthy and sloppy.

Also, Pence looked fit as a fiddle!


I saw one really fat guy on the republican side, he had to pull on the seat in front of him and take a couple of little hops before he could stand up for each ovation. The rest looked to be in good shape.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Team Mitch!

Agnzona
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This thread is *****Officially Closed******
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

Need to resurrect this thread for a minute. But it is for a great reason!!!


I hope people keep a close eye on Captain Fatass. His mental health can't be too good right now.

pdc093
How long do you want to ignore this user?
omg....
[url=<blockquote][/url]
Quote:

If corrupt, criminal, traitor President @realDonaldTrump fires hero patriot Lt. Alexander Vindman today, the Democratic Party should immediately recruit him to be on a ballot for elected office in 2020.

Vindman is the kind of officerholder we needhttps://t.co/jtAYYHcPhM
Fernand R. Amandi (@AmandiOnAir) February 7, 2020
What's an 'officerholder'....anyone?
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jimmy Valentine said:

BMX Bandit said:

VegasAg86 said:

Jimmy Valentine said:

Bird93 said:

Jimmy Valentine said:

Pinche Abogado said:

Sure. You seem to argue that if a President acts in any way that might (even in some far fetched circumstance, including writing a book) may personally benefit him/her after their presidency, that those actions are impeachable during their presidency.
Writing a book was just an example of how being the President could be personally beneficial. Every President has the right to do that once they leave office. While in office though, the President is not permitted to use the power of his office with the intention of benefiting themselves personally.

For instance, Joe Biden is not permitted to use the power of his Vice Presidency to protect his son. If he did, he should be punished.
But unfortunately, the person with the knowledge, means and authority to initiate that investigation isn't allowed to do so in your view.
There is nothing stopping Attorney General Barr from opening an investigation. White House Counsel today confirmed our DOJ has no such investigation opened. Don't you think that's strange?


You don't seriously believe they could announce an investigation into Biden family corruption tomorrow without the left going ballistic, do you? A new impeachment inquiry would begin immediately.


Haven forbid the left go ballistic! Whatever would we do?

Announcement not necessary. Have grand jury look into it. (Maybe they already are)


White House Counsel was asked by a Senator yesterday if it was being investigated, and they said No.

Huh, its almost like the DOJ might have been hamstrung on opening the investigation until after impeachment ended.

Weird. Its almost like the whole thing was a stall tactic.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

My basis is we would have heard about it by now, loudly proclaimed by Trump or at least a strategic leak. And that officials who would know, aka Lindsey Graham, have publicly called for one.

You have no basis to claim that there is.


Gary might actually have the power to see the future, just only the stuff where he is dead ass wrong.

Lindsey Graham just made his nightmare a reality! Dork.
John Maplethorpe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Graham opened a a senate inquiry three months ago. Crickets. A politically motivated investigation ordered by Trump doesn't signal new found credibility. Giuliani has been "investigating" for two years, Graham has access to White House records of Biden meetings. Russian intelligence agencies are digging for Biden dirt on Trump's behalf. Still crickets.

All Rudy has to show for all that work is the after-the-fact deposition of a disgraced, corrupt, prosecutor, working on behalf of a Russian-Ukrainian mobster oligarch trying to avoid extradition. Shokin was the most hated man in Ukraine for reasons having nothing to do with Burisma, and the entire country tells us he's lying.

But Trump couldn't believe it. Not on this or the stupid Crowdstrike thing. He couldn't because he didn't want to. What the Russians were selling him he liked better than the truth his staff was giving him.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
John Maplethorpe said:

Graham opened a a senate inquiry three months ago. Crickets. A politically motivated investigation ordered by Trump doesn't signal new found credibility. Giuliani has been "investigating" for two years, Graham has access to White House records of Biden meetings. Russian intelligence agencies are digging for Biden dirt on Trump's behalf. Still crickets.

All Rudy has to show for all that work is the after-the-fact deposition of a disgraced, corrupt, prosecutor, working on behalf of a Russian-Ukrainian mobster oligarch trying to avoid extradition. Shokin was the most hated man in Ukraine for reasons having nothing to do with Burisma, and the entire country tells us he's lying.

But Trump couldn't believe it. Not on this or the stupid Crowdstrike thing. He couldn't because he didn't want to. What the Russians were selling him he liked better than the truth his staff was giving him.
John's been wrong about absolutely everything. I'd better bookmark this, too.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
John Maplethorpe said:

Graham opened a a senate inquiry three months ago. Crickets. A politically motivated investigation ordered by Trump doesn't signal new found credibility. Giuliani has been "investigating" for two years, Graham has access to White House records of Biden meetings. Russian intelligence agencies are digging for Biden dirt on Trump's behalf. Still crickets.

All Rudy has to show for all that work is the after-the-fact deposition of a disgraced, corrupt, prosecutor, working on behalf of a Russian-Ukrainian mobster oligarch trying to avoid extradition. Shokin was the most hated man in Ukraine for reasons having nothing to do with Burisma, and the entire country tells us he's lying.

But Trump couldn't believe it. Not on this or the stupid Crowdstrike thing. He couldn't because he didn't want to. What the Russians were selling him he liked better than the truth his staff was giving him.


We will see about this Biden stuff, buddy. Don't think I didn't notice you are still drinking that Russia conspiracy koolaid.

Plus the irony of you complaining about a "politically motivated investigation" after the garbage investigation by House Managers is glorious. Cry more.

Mapledork, let me give you some advice to understand Trump. Take him seriously, not literally. According to you, you think he is a stupid fraud liar, yet you hang your argument on the words of Donald Trump like a religious fanatic.

Ukraine meddled in 2016, to the point the FBI (and you to this day) got fooled into thinking Trump is a puppet of Putin. It's worth investigating. Just like The Biden's blatant unethical behavior. Sorry your team is so ****ing blatantly hypocritical and stupid.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

John Maplethorpe said:

Graham opened a a senate inquiry three months ago. Crickets. A politically motivated investigation ordered by Trump doesn't signal new found credibility. Giuliani has been "investigating" for two years, Graham has access to White House records of Biden meetings. Russian intelligence agencies are digging for Biden dirt on Trump's behalf. Still crickets.

All Rudy has to show for all that work is the after-the-fact deposition of a disgraced, corrupt, prosecutor, working on behalf of a Russian-Ukrainian mobster oligarch trying to avoid extradition. Shokin was the most hated man in Ukraine for reasons having nothing to do with Burisma, and the entire country tells us he's lying.

But Trump couldn't believe it. Not on this or the stupid Crowdstrike thing. He couldn't because he didn't want to. What the Russians were selling him he liked better than the truth his staff was giving him.
John's been wrong about absolutely everything. I'd better bookmark this, too.








Mapledork gets mushroom stamped in less than 12 hours.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hbtheduce said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

John Maplethorpe said:

John's been wrong about absolutely everything. I'd better bookmark this, too.

Mapledork gets mushroom stamped in less than 12 hours.
It was inevitable. That's why I said what I said.
John Maplethorpe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
More evidence released today under FOIA. There was no interagency review process.

Whit House OMB lied to Congress, lied to DOD.

John Maplethorpe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

John Maplethorpe said:

Graham opened a a senate inquiry three months ago. Crickets. A politically motivated investigation ordered by Trump doesn't signal new found credibility. Giuliani has been "investigating" for two years, Graham has access to White House records of Biden meetings. Russian intelligence agencies are digging for Biden dirt on Trump's behalf. Still crickets.

All Rudy has to show for all that work is the after-the-fact deposition of a disgraced, corrupt, prosecutor, working on behalf of a Russian-Ukrainian mobster oligarch trying to avoid extradition. Shokin was the most hated man in Ukraine for reasons having nothing to do with Burisma, and the entire country tells us he's lying.

But Trump couldn't believe it. Not on this or the stupid Crowdstrike thing. He couldn't because he didn't want to. What the Russians were selling him he liked better than the truth his staff was giving him.
John's been wrong about absolutely nothing. When challenged I can't provide a single link


Fify
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
John Maplethorpe said:

More evidence released today under FOIA. There was no interagency review process.

Whit House OMB lied to Congress, lied to DOD.




So what's your latest prediction on how long Trump will be POTUS? Because all of other predictions have been so accurate ...
Spotted Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
John Maplethorpe said:

More evidence released today under FOIA. There was no interagency review process.

Whit House OMB lied to Congress, lied to DOD.


Joe Exotic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I see Maplethorp is still hiding out on this thread and refusing to discuss actual policy and issues.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So we are still arguing about policy disagreements?
Post removed:
by user
EKUAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trying to find the article I saw today reference the ICIG who changed the rules to allow "whistleblower" hearsay evidence. His wife is connected to:

Fusion GPS
EKUAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
John Maplethorpe said:

More evidence released today under FOIA. There was no interagency review process.

Whit House OMB lied to Congress, lied to DOD.




Is this a real news source or another Dem propaganda site? Never heard of them.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Is this a real news source or another Dem propaganda site? Never heard of them.
I have seen them before. Based on the content I viewed, Dem propaganda site.

Although in that tweet speaking of "unredacted" emails but showing one email that is completely redacted is a nice touch.
John Maplethorpe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The emails are real. Released under FOIA.

Read the source material for yourself if you don't trust commentary. The White House was lying to the DOD, GAO, and congress, and they continue to release absurdly redacted documents in a stalling strategy.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
John Maplethorpe said:

More evidence released today under FOIA. There was no interagency review process.

Whit House OMB lied to Congress, lied to DOD.


e=mc2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Is this a real news source or another Dem propaganda site? Never heard of them.
I have seen them before. Based on the content I viewed, Dem propaganda site.

Although in that tweet speaking of "unredacted" emails but showing one email that is completely redacted is a nice touch.
Of course it's BS. That's all liberals spout and spew. Nothing but lies.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
John Maplethorpe said:

The emails are real. Released under FOIA.

Read the source material for yourself if you don't trust commentary. The White House was lying to the DOD, GAO, and congress, and they continue to release absurdly redacted documents in a stalling strategy.

Past presidents have lied to start wars, pass obamacare, even to protect their marriage. None have been removed for these lies.

Boo. Hoo.
John Maplethorpe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Paoletta wrote in an early December 2019 letter to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), explaining in bureaucratese that the Pentagon's legal affairs division simply had not expressed any concerns about the legality of the White House's Ukraine aid hold.

But Paoletta was simply lying.

A late August email from DOD Deputy Principle General Counsel Edwin "Scott" Castle expresses the Pentagon's concerns about exactly that. Castle's email also carbon copied DOD General Counsel Paul Neydestroying any plausible OMB defense that the full chain of command was not apprised.

Again, the originally-released version of this email was redacted to the point of meaninglessness.



They had to go back to court to fight the redactions, new documents produced with a few redactions removed, back to court, redactions, back to court, rinse, repeat.

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/new-ukraine-emails-prove-white-house-lied-to-congressional-investigators/
houag80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bless your heart.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Poor dude doesn't even know he's lost.
First Page Last Page
Page 260 of 264
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.