No one gives a ****, because the request for the investigation was predicated on legitimate concerns. There's nothing you can say or do to change that. If it was started on legitimate concerns of corruption, the argument that the investigation was purely politically motivated is not possibly true. This was a pathetic attempt by Dems at throwing **** against the wall to see what sticks. They promised the day he was elected to impeach him and this was the best excuse they could come up with to take that purely partisan political action. You fell for their unbelievably weak narratives hook line and sinker to the point of derangement. Seek help before you hurt yourself or someone else. This is not healthy and we're concerned for you. I mean seriously take a step back and take a look at who you're choosing to believe. Taking the word of a Democrat seriously shows a serious lack of personal judgement and should make you question your sanity.John Maplethorpe said:Quote:
Paoletta wrote in an early December 2019 letter to the Government Accountability Office (GAO), explaining in bureaucratese that the Pentagon's legal affairs division simply had not expressed any concerns about the legality of the White House's Ukraine aid hold.
But Paoletta was simply lying.
A late August email from DOD Deputy Principle General Counsel Edwin "Scott" Castle expresses the Pentagon's concerns about exactly that. Castle's email also carbon copied DOD General Counsel Paul Neydestroying any plausible OMB defense that the full chain of command was not apprised.
Again, the originally-released version of this email was redacted to the point of meaninglessness.
They had to go back to court to fight the redactions, new documents produced with a few redactions removed, back to court, redactions, back to court, rinse, repeat.
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/new-ukraine-emails-prove-white-house-lied-to-congressional-investigators/
***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****
981,038 Views |
9220 Replies |
Last: 1 yr ago by Pizza
We^re Texas said:You care so little you have hundreds of posts about just UkrainegateQuote:
No one gives a ****
Nobody cares so much this thread has half a million views.
Can't wait to find out who just started this sock.
The president has been acquitted and everyone knows the impeachment was a partisan sham. No one cares about the continued confirmation bias "evidence" Gary keeps rolling out sourced from lunatic leftists that take every action or inaction in context to fit their pathetic narratives. These people are unhinged and so are you if you support them. Maybe ya'll can go to a group therapy session together.We^re Texas said:You care so little you have hundreds of posts about just UkrainegateQuote:
No one gives a ****
Nobody cares so much this thread has half a million views.
Hey John Maglethorpe. Its ****ign over. You lost. And do not insult our intelligence by pretending to be a Republican. You are a leftist and we all know it.
You need to start concentrating on something that matters. Maybe the 2020 election. Because right now you are favored to run a real socialist(which will probably appeal to you), and also running almost two to one dog.
You are fightnig for a lost cause. And while it is somewhat entertaining to some of us, if you really want to beat Trump you may want to move on from this.
Loser.
You need to start concentrating on something that matters. Maybe the 2020 election. Because right now you are favored to run a real socialist(which will probably appeal to you), and also running almost two to one dog.
You are fightnig for a lost cause. And while it is somewhat entertaining to some of us, if you really want to beat Trump you may want to move on from this.
Loser.
The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you never know if they are genuine. -- Abraham Lincoln.
Okay, who's sock are you?We^re Texas said:You care so little you have hundreds of posts about just UkrainegateQuote:
No one gives a ****
Nobody cares so much this thread has half a million views.
Joined: Dec 15, 2012
Posts: 2
We^re Texas said:You care so little you have hundreds of posts about just UkrainegateQuote:
No one gives a ****
Nobody cares so much this thread has half a million views.
Lot y busts another out of the stable
Bingo... dude just can't get it .. it's F ing over .. delusions of grandeur from this John guy.agsalaska said:
Hey John Maglethorpe. Its ****ign over. You lost. And do not insult our intelligence by pretending to be a Republican. You are a leftist and we all know it.
You need to start concentrating on something that matters. Maybe the 2020 election. Because right now you are favored to run a real socialist(which will probably appeal to you), and also running almost two to one dog.
You are fightnig for a lost cause. And while it is somewhat entertaining to some of us, if you really want to beat Trump you may want to move on from this.
Loser.
She isn't our prez and never will be! & CNN is an enemy of the state !
This thread is still going?
Dem socks could not accept that Hillary lost.
Now they cannot accept that the sham impeachment ended up as just a partisan hack job only because Orange Man Bad.
Impeachment would have had more credibility if Democrat idiots didn't promise impeachment from the day Trump was elected, if the Democrats didn't campaign on impeaching Trump on 2018, if Democrat idiots didn't say that Trump had to be impeached because he would win the election, and if during the Senate trial, Schiff for Brains didn't say that we cannot trust the American people to elect the president. Also, it especially would have been more believable if there actually were an impeachable crime.
The Democrats and MSM have lost any credibility with anyone who watched the Kavanaugh hearings, the Mueller hearings, the House impeachment hearings, and the Senate trial first hand.
Only those who get their news (propaganda) from CNN, MSNBC, ABC News, CBS News, PBS etc. actually believe that the Democrats are telling the truth.
At least metcetera, JM, etc. gave us the Dem/MSM taking points before we would hear them on the "news".
Dem socks could not accept that Hillary lost.
Now they cannot accept that the sham impeachment ended up as just a partisan hack job only because Orange Man Bad.
Impeachment would have had more credibility if Democrat idiots didn't promise impeachment from the day Trump was elected, if the Democrats didn't campaign on impeaching Trump on 2018, if Democrat idiots didn't say that Trump had to be impeached because he would win the election, and if during the Senate trial, Schiff for Brains didn't say that we cannot trust the American people to elect the president. Also, it especially would have been more believable if there actually were an impeachable crime.
The Democrats and MSM have lost any credibility with anyone who watched the Kavanaugh hearings, the Mueller hearings, the House impeachment hearings, and the Senate trial first hand.
Only those who get their news (propaganda) from CNN, MSNBC, ABC News, CBS News, PBS etc. actually believe that the Democrats are telling the truth.
At least metcetera, JM, etc. gave us the Dem/MSM taking points before we would hear them on the "news".
They never thought she would lose.
John Maplethorpe said:
The emails are real. Released under FOIA.
Read the source material for yourself if you don't trust commentary. The White House was lying to the DOD, GAO, and congress, and they continue to release absurdly redacted documents in a stalling strategy.
Maybe you should impeach him again so you can avoid more policy discussion.
Take the loss Maplethorpe
SpreadsheetAg said:
Take the loss Maplethorpe
You should have quoted Mehlinger.
Shocking that Adam Schiff built a case entirely on speculation.
Gary you've had a week off. You're a little rusty.
What do you have to say about these emails?
You were one of the ones saying that Trump only released the funds until after the House said they were starting an investigation.
You were one of the ones saying that Trump only released the funds until after the House said they were starting an investigation.
Did Adam Schiff prove intent to influence the election? Did he prove that the intent was not to investigate legitimate concerns of corruption in the 2nd highest office of the land? Neither can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The entire impeachment is based on assumptions that would be thrown out of any court of law in the country. The impeachment vote was made entirely by partisan hacks who are also terrible human beings, that for some reason you side with. There was zero objectivity.John Maplethorpe said:hbtheduce said:
Shocking that Adam Schiff built a case entirely on speculation.
LOL there are still people that think Trump didn't do it?
Learn this phase: "Doesn't rise to the level of impeachment". It's the only defense left that isn't insane or willfully blind. Trump continues to lie about it which is a problem, but he's made everybody used to it by now.
Mulvaney would have been in the house bunker giving a deposition in September if it would have allowed Trump to avoid impeachment.
What's even more concerning for our society, are the idiots who are more anti-Trump than they are anti-corruption. Biden is on camera admitting to exactly what the left attempted to impeach Trump for. Meanwhile, ignoring Trump wanted to ensure U.S. taxpayer funds were not being funneled to a country and then laundered into the Biden's bank accounts. If you don't believe that the Bidens aren't corrupt, please quit posting on this site. Trump campaigned on getting rid of corruption, now the corrupt are trying to get rid of him for investigating them.
Kinda reminds me of that time when Trump tweeted that Obama spied on him...and the MSM and left came unglued saying he was off his rocker.....yet, 2 years later we find out it was all true.
Kinda reminds me of that time when Trump tweeted that Obama spied on him...and the MSM and left came unglued saying he was off his rocker.....yet, 2 years later we find out it was all true.
/W\ Saw 'Em Off! /W\
BTHO tu.
BTHO tu.
John Maplethorpe said:hbtheduce said:
Shocking that Adam Schiff built a case entirely on speculation.
LOL there are still people that think Trump didn't do it?
Learn this phase: "Doesn't rise to the level of impeachment". It's the only defense left that isn't insane or willfully blind. Trump continues to lie about it which is a problem, but he's made everybody used to it by now.
Mulvaney would have been in the house bunker giving a deposition in September if it would have allowed Trump to avoid impeachment.
You still care about impeachment.
agsalaska
Joined:
Sep 21, 2007
Posts:
36,143
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm embarrassed for you.
I'll give you a gig 'em for persistence, even when you are proven wrong every time.
After seeing impeachment and everything the media does to Republicans, particularly Trump, and the reporting from Woodward and Bernstein in relation to our president I believe Nixon was setup. Someone who wanted Nixon to go down setup the robbery using republican fools and got Nixon to cover it up and Nixon fell for the trap. Woodward and Bernstein were just throwing **** against the wall and got lucky.
Only reason it hasn't worked against Trump is Trump let the chips fall where they may as you should do and that has driven the rats and the corrupt politicians insane.
Only reason it hasn't worked against Trump is Trump let the chips fall where they may as you should do and that has driven the rats and the corrupt politicians insane.
The world needs mean tweets
My Pronouns Ultra and MAGA
Trump 2024
My Pronouns Ultra and MAGA
Trump 2024
John Maplethorpe said:hbtheduce said:
Shocking that Adam Schiff built a case entirely on speculation.
LOL there are still people that think Trump didn't do it?
Learn this phase: "Doesn't rise to the level of impeachment". It's the only defense left that isn't insane or willfully blind. Trump continues to lie about it which is a problem, but he's made everybody used to it by now.
Mulvaney would have been in the house bunker giving a deposition in September if it would have allowed Trump to avoid impeachment.
I've been repeating the same thing, mapledork, since September.
Legal actions of the president don't rise to the level of an impeachable offense. The rushed garbage articles of impeachment will be remembered as a partisan failure.
John Maplethorpe said:hbtheduce said:
Shocking that Adam Schiff built a case entirely on speculation.
LOL there are still people that think Trump didn't do it?
Learn this phase: "Doesn't rise to the level of impeachment". It's the only defense left that isn't insane or willfully blind. Trump continues to lie about it which is a problem, but he's made everybody used to it by now.
Mulvaney would have been in the house bunker giving a deposition in September if it would have allowed Trump to avoid impeachment.
Learn the phrase "you lost, get over it." Also, get use to it.
Bump as promised to remind all you Lib socks on this thread
1) How incredibly wrong you were and all that tortured logic and water carrying made zero difference
2) Trump was Acquitted
3) Trump is more popular than ever thanks to your party's idiocy
1) How incredibly wrong you were and all that tortured logic and water carrying made zero difference
2) Trump was Acquitted
3) Trump is more popular than ever thanks to your party's idiocy
John Maplethorpe said:hbtheduce said:
Shocking that Adam Schiff built a case entirely on speculation.
LOL there are still people that think Trump didn't do it? Me
Learn this phase: "Doesn't rise to the level of impeachment". It's the only defense left that isn't insane or willfully blind. Trump continues to lie about it which is a problem, but he's made everybody used to it by now. Don't need to. You are wrong, as usual.
Mulvaney would have been in the house bunker giving a deposition in September if it would have allowed Trump to avoid impeachment. Wrong again, the insane Democrats are hell bent on impeachment for any specious, BS lies, innuendo, etcetera,etcetera, etcetera they can convince useful idiots to claim.
Gary\Chase\Mapplethorpe feverishly seeking a refund of his John Bolton newsletter subscription
Featured Stories
See All
22:40
1h ago
890
9:38
6h ago
1.4k
Around CFB: Predicting the top 12 teams in initial CFP rankings
by Olin Buchanan
CoppellAg2009
Sark says Texas hosting "arguably the best looking team in SEC"
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
53