BallerStaf2003 said:Bo Darville said:BallerStaf2003 said:
I think the hardliners on this thread that say this all has to be made up are dismissing how difficult it was in the 80's and 90's for a woman to speak out about rape.
Both of my sisters were raped in college at JMU, and my mother was raped in Montreal. They never reported it. They moved on bc that was just what you did back then.
I think if you really think about the time They were in, it should give you a smidge if doubt of kavanaughs innocence.
I've also been a sexual harassment and assault advocate in the Army and have represented too many girls that lied to ruin the careers of others.
Exactly. Why this situation is just terrible for our country. It's like the lowest common denominator of gross.
If his best friend came forward and said that they got girls drunk to go poundtown on passed out girls, that would be about the level of testimony i would need to disqualify him. I think.
That would be a huge piece of corroborating evidence from a first hand witness. So I want to agree with you, but there would have to be caveats. It would have to be under sworn testimony provided to an actual law enforcement official. Its too easy to get paid to lie to the media.
But I doubt it happens because his best friend has likely been interviewed 3-5 times by the FBI for background checks. And there are major investigations by politicians themselves before nominating someone to check for major black marks like raping a girl in high school. This would already been known and would have prevented his nomination.