Quote:
Top Republicans on Wednesday demanded that Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) Michael Atkinson explain why the watchdog hasn't said if it's investigating "a number of leaks of highly sensitive information" in recent years -- and released several previously unpublished texts and emails from since-fired FBI agent Peter Strzok.
.......
Senate Homeland Security Committee Chairman Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, specifically asked the ICIG why Strzok texted bureau colleague Lisa Page on Dec. 15, 2016: "Think our sisters have begun leaking like mad. Scorned and worried and political, they're kicking in to overdrive."
.......
Additionally, the senators pushed to know whether the ICIG was looking into Strzok's email to FBI colleagues on April 13, 2017, when he wrote that an unidentified "agency" might be the "source of some of the leaks" to the media that he'd been seeing.
"I'm beginning to think the agency got info a lot earlier than we thought and hasn't shared it completely with us," Strzok wrote, according to documents that the senators included in their letter to the ICIG. "Might explain all these weird/seemingly incorrect leads all these media folks have. Would also highlight agency as a source of some of the leaks."
In a June 6, 2017 email to Page, Strzok mused, "Think there will be a crescendo of leaks/articles leading up to Thurs."
And, a Dec. 13, 2016 text message apparently showed Strzok trying to set up a Skype meeting with a reporter. "Text from reporter: retrieving my password for Skype," he wrote.
.......
BillYeoman said:
I like the NYtimes spin about "political payback."
Here we go....about time...
Quote:
...It was not clear what potential crime Mr. Durham was investigating, nor when the criminal investigation was prompted. A justice Department spokeswoman declined to comment....
MOCO9 said:Writes "which is likely to raise alarms of political payback" in order to raise alarms of political payback.BillYeoman said:
I like the NYtimes spin about "political payback."
Here we go....about time...
4stringAg said:MOCO9 said:Writes "which is likely to raise alarms of political payback" in order to raise alarms of political payback.BillYeoman said:
I like the NYtimes spin about "political payback."
Here we go....about time...
Well said. It'll be parroted by Dems starting immediately.
Probably, but it will have Trump being a puppet of Putin, all of the collusion delusion being 100% true, and the heroes will be Pelosi, Schiff, etc.GreyhoundDad said:
How do they make a movie about this someday? I have a hard time following along by reading all of y'all's great comments. A movie would be incredibly complicated. It would need to be 72 hours long. There are so many characters and story lines to document. It is an amazing story. I wish the press and Hollywood would embrace it. It challenges the greatest story ever told.
fasthorses05 said:
Ok fellers, since Durham is apparently going from an administrative review, to a criminal inquiry to impanel a grand jury, will all of his interviews be under oath? I thought all of the interviews during the administrative review were under oath. Obviously, I'm confused.
What powers will Durham have? Will he be able to tell Wray to kiss his ass? I'm thrilled by this news, but I want to know if the bad guys can delay and obfuscate, like they have been for the last three years.
Rapier108 said:Probably, but it will have Trump being a puppet of Putin, all of the collusion delusion being 100% true, and the heroes will be Pelosi, Schiff, etc.GreyhoundDad said:
How do they make a movie about this someday? I have a hard time following along by reading all of y'all's great comments. A movie would be incredibly complicated. It would need to be 72 hours long. There are so many characters and story lines to document. It is an amazing story. I wish the press and Hollywood would embrace it. It challenges the greatest story ever told.
Pretty sure his comments are with respect to HOW Hollywood will distort the facts. If you think they won't...it's you who is most likely, delusional.EKUAg said:Rapier108 said:Probably, but it will have Trump being a puppet of Putin, all of the collusion delusion being 100% true, and the heroes will be Pelosi, Schiff, etc.GreyhoundDad said:
How do they make a movie about this someday? I have a hard time following along by reading all of y'all's great comments. A movie would be incredibly complicated. It would need to be 72 hours long. There are so many characters and story lines to document. It is an amazing story. I wish the press and Hollywood would embrace it. It challenges the greatest story ever told.
My you are delusional.
Isn't he "hands off" and not allowed to join the fray for a period of time?biglebowski said:
I wonder what Trey Gowdy has been up to the last few weeks??
Check your sarcasm detector. I think it needs a new battery.EKUAg said:Rapier108 said:Probably, but it will have Trump being a puppet of Putin, all of the collusion delusion being 100% true, and the heroes will be Pelosi, Schiff, etc.GreyhoundDad said:
How do they make a movie about this someday? I have a hard time following along by reading all of y'all's great comments. A movie would be incredibly complicated. It would need to be 72 hours long. There are so many characters and story lines to document. It is an amazing story. I wish the press and Hollywood would embrace it. It challenges the greatest story ever told.
My you are delusional.
4stringAg said:MOCO9 said:Writes "which is likely to raise alarms of political payback" in order to raise alarms of political payback.BillYeoman said:
I like the NYtimes spin about "political payback."
Here we go....about time...
Well said. It'll be parroted by Dems starting immediately.
At least someone got it.whatthehey78 said:Pretty sure his comments are with respect to HOW Hollywood will distort the facts. If you think they won't...it's you who is most likely, delusional.EKUAg said:Rapier108 said:Probably, but it will have Trump being a puppet of Putin, all of the collusion delusion being 100% true, and the heroes will be Pelosi, Schiff, etc.GreyhoundDad said:
How do they make a movie about this someday? I have a hard time following along by reading all of y'all's great comments. A movie would be incredibly complicated. It would need to be 72 hours long. There are so many characters and story lines to document. It is an amazing story. I wish the press and Hollywood would embrace it. It challenges the greatest story ever told.
My you are delusional.
4stringAg said:4stringAg said:MOCO9 said:Writes "which is likely to raise alarms of political payback" in order to raise alarms of political payback.BillYeoman said:
I like the NYtimes spin about "political payback."
Here we go....about time...
Well said. It'll be parroted by Dems starting immediately.
Right on cue, According to Ingrahams show, Schiff and Nadler have released a statement claiming Durham's probe is political retribution.
They probably had it written months ago, and just needed to add a date to it.4stringAg said:4stringAg said:MOCO9 said:Writes "which is likely to raise alarms of political payback" in order to raise alarms of political payback.BillYeoman said:
I like the NYtimes spin about "political payback."
Here we go....about time...
Well said. It'll be parroted by Dems starting immediately.
Right on cue, According to Ingrahams show, Schiff and Nadler have released a statement claiming Durham's probe is political retribution.
Rapier108 said:At least someone got it.whatthehey78 said:Pretty sure his comments are with respect to HOW Hollywood will distort the facts. If you think they won't...it's you who is most likely, delusional.EKUAg said:Rapier108 said:Probably, but it will have Trump being a puppet of Putin, all of the collusion delusion being 100% true, and the heroes will be Pelosi, Schiff, etc.GreyhoundDad said:
How do they make a movie about this someday? I have a hard time following along by reading all of y'all's great comments. A movie would be incredibly complicated. It would need to be 72 hours long. There are so many characters and story lines to document. It is an amazing story. I wish the press and Hollywood would embrace it. It challenges the greatest story ever told.
My you are delusional.
Rapier108 said:They probably had it written months ago, and just needed to add a date to it.4stringAg said:4stringAg said:MOCO9 said:Writes "which is likely to raise alarms of political payback" in order to raise alarms of political payback.BillYeoman said:
I like the NYtimes spin about "political payback."
Here we go....about time...
Well said. It'll be parroted by Dems starting immediately.
Right on cue, According to Ingrahams show, Schiff and Nadler have released a statement claiming Durham's probe is political retribution.