Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,546,844 Views | 49289 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by VegasAg86
cbr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tailgate88 said:

I have no doubt Hilldawg's server was hacked, and probably more than once, but it was much more likely due to insecure mail server software and firewalls than mysterious malicious Chinese chips on the motherboard of their backup server. See: Occam's razor.
LOL, that's a joke and a half. Its PURPOSE was to be a conduit for Clinton and the DNC to sell american secret data to china and others. There can't seriously be people who don't know that, right?

Of course, it was probably ALSO hacked by others that didnt want to pay the DNC for american secrets.... but that was certainly its purpose.
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prognightmare said:

The Mueller Report just got dropped via CNBC.com
So much for those indictments predicted by Dean and Bernstein.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prognightmare said:

The Mueller Report just got dropped via CNBC.com
Plenty of indictments, right?
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zombie Jon Snow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm going to miss this thread.
cbr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
cbr said:

Tailgate88 said:

I have no doubt Hilldawg's server was hacked, and probably more than once, but it was much more likely due to insecure mail server software and firewalls than mysterious malicious Chinese chips on the motherboard of their backup server. See: Occam's razor.
LOL, that's a joke and a half. Its PURPOSE was to be a conduit for Clinton and the DNC to sell american secret data to china and others. There can't seriously be people who don't know that, right?

Of course, it was probably ALSO hacked by others that didnt want to pay the DNC for american secrets.... but that was certainly its purpose.
LOL, oh and by the way, i am not just picking on the clintons, who have already been proven to have been deliberately selling influence to the chinese military as their path to power.

i tend to think THEIR china connection might even have originated through bill's CIA drug running days in arkansas, and HW's CIA days in China, around the same time.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

I'm going to miss this thread.
I suspect it will live on for quite a while, since we also discuss all of the things like FISA abuse. There is also the Concord Management case still on going unless DOJ decides to just dismiss it.

Plus, it maybe weeks or months before anything is made public if at all.
SPF250
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How long before Rosenstein, voluntarily or involuntarily, is out the door? I'm guessing by tomorrow afternoon.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So now that this is over...where is the FISA application that Trump already ordered to be declassified?
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
End Of Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MadDog73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sunday morning talk shows should be fun!
VaultingChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Looks like the report ended with a whimper, not the bang Dems were salivating for.
Whens lunch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
For your perusal:

Not when I'm done with it.
End Of Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No other indictments coming per foxnews. MAGA.
Zombie Jon Snow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pinche Abogado said:

No other indictments coming per foxnews. MAGA.


Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So what about Flynn? I wonder how this impacts his continued delayed sentencing.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prosperdick said:

So what about Flynn? I wonder how this impacts his continued delayed sentencing.
Good question. I have no idea.
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
End Of Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Prosperdick said:

So what about Flynn? I wonder how this impacts his continued delayed sentencing.
Good question. I have no idea.

I predict that it fades into the abyss with no formal disposition. Mark my words.
dellgriffith
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Many thanks to all of the people that contributed to this thread. Especially aggiehawg, drcrinum, Roscoe and blindey for your insight and expertise.
I have spent way too much time on this thread and enjoyed every minute of it. Any of us paying attention to this thread knew the result of the SC would be a big nothing.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
JB!98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dellgriffith said:

Many thanks to all of the people that contributed to this thread. Especially aggiehawg, drcrinum, Roscoe and blindey for your insight and expertise.
I have spent way too much time on this thread and enjoyed every minute of it. Any of us paying attention to this thread knew the result of the SC would be a big nothing.

Concur. Posted about the same thing in the other thread. Appreciate all the effort.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pinche Abogado said:

aggiehawg said:

Prosperdick said:

So what about Flynn? I wonder how this impacts his continued delayed sentencing.
Good question. I have no idea.

I predict that it fades into the abyss with no formal disposition. Mark my words.
It just might. I hope so. If he received any time, they know Trump would commute his sentence anyway.
GrassFarmer88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dellgriffith said:

Many thanks to all of the people that contributed to this thread. Especially aggiehawg, drcrinum, Roscoe and blindey for your insight and expertise.
I have spent way too much time on this thread and enjoyed every minute of it. Any of us paying attention to this thread knew the result of the SC would be a big nothing.

End Of Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Pinche Abogado said:

aggiehawg said:

Prosperdick said:

So what about Flynn? I wonder how this impacts his continued delayed sentencing.
Good question. I have no idea.

I predict that it fades into the abyss with no formal disposition. Mark my words.
It just might. I hope so. If he received any time, they know Trump would commute his sentence anyway.
Something changed between Flynn's trial and sometime around 4 months ago. Me thinks that this has been long in the works--which is why the sentencing hearing was delayed multiple times.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. Im going own the rabbit hole after today.
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pinche Abogado said:

aggiehawg said:

Pinche Abogado said:

aggiehawg said:

Prosperdick said:

So what about Flynn? I wonder how this impacts his continued delayed sentencing.
Good question. I have no idea.

I predict that it fades into the abyss with no formal disposition. Mark my words.
It just might. I hope so. If he received any time, they know Trump would commute his sentence anyway.
Something changed between Flynn's trial and sometime around 4 months ago. Me thinks that this has been long in the works--which is why the sentencing hearing was delayed multiple times.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. Im going own the rabbit hole after today.
Flynn didn't go to trial, he made a plea deal.

But you are right in that Team Mueller took a turn awhile ago on their tactics regarding Flynn. That was when the FBI's 302s were provided to the judge on the Flynn January 2017 interview with Strzok and Pienta and McCabe's involvement in editing them. McCabe had a personal beef with Flynn and should have never even touched that 302 in any fashion.

McCabe is reportedly under grand jury investigation. Team Mueller would have been wise to keep kicking the sentencing of Flynn down the road to see if the 302 was altered by McCabe. If it came out that their entire harassment and prosecution of Flynn was based on a manufactured 302, that's misconduct worthy of disbarment and possible jail time.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Now let's focus on the Democrats.
I think that, to be very honest with you, I do believe that we should have rightly believed, but we certainly believe that certain issues are just settled.

- Kamala Harris

Vote for Trump.
He took a bullet for America.

End Of Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Youre right, I get to follow from a 30000 ft. view, equating charging instrument with trial. Mea culpa.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No problem. This mess has been difficult for me to even keep up with and follow and I don't have files on my computer for this stuff. Rely on my memory and if I'm unclear on something, I'll chase it back down to ensure my accuracy. (Even though I failed more times than I care to admit but own my mistakes.)
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Calling Mueller to testify in open hearing is a massive mistake by Dems, in my view. Not in a public setting, at least.

When Comey revealed the existence of the Trump/Russia counter-intel probe in a public hearing, he screwed the pooch.

Mueller won't follow suit, on that. He can't.
tsuag10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
One interesting thing that I've heard (pertaining to the report) a few times now is that

"anything that was brought before a grand jury that DID NOT result in an indictment CANNOT be made public."

That could prove to be extremely frustrating.

Anyone else hear that too?
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tsuag10 said:

One interesting thing that I've heard (pertaining to the report) a few times now is that

"anything that was brought before a grand jury that DID NOT result in an indictment CANNOT be made public."

That could prove to be extremely frustrating.

Anyone else hear that too?
Yes, I have. That is part of the problem with Comey's statement exonerating Hillary. He broke protocol by laying out all of the evidence against her.
First Page Last Page
Page 738 of 1409
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.