Have seen a shift of support away from Trump on this board due to the recent bill. I wonder if there will now be less anti-investigation rhetoric as well?
Why? I want to see everyone who took part in this attempted coup swinging from a rope for treason. That has nothing to do with Trump and I don't think it matters who the perp was, no matter how high he or she may have been in the last administration or this one. But we do know Trump is innocent of the bogus accusations.that_one_guy said:
Have seen a shift of support away from Trump on this board due to the recent bill. I wonder if there will now be less anti-investigation rhetoric as well?
Not nearly severe enough punishment for their (and others) misdeeds. Should initiate the appropriate justice with a pair of bolt cutters and an old fashioned auto cigarette lighter...if you get my drift.backintexas2013 said:
I don't like Trump but I sure as hell don't like what the FBI and others have done. Page and Pete the Cheat should be shown the door just like Andy the Idiot.
Are there any other verified events on the Weiner laptop timeline?MouthBQ98 said:
Summary also left out that the only apparent reason Comey ever went to congress is because local investigators notified the NY FBI field office that the emails existed and they inquired about it, which meant the Leadership couldn't sit on it and had to head off any possible leaks to the public that would make it apparent they were intentionally sitting on it.
That ended during Bush 43's second term.Quote:
These 4 Fusion GPS principals were former WSJ journalists. Makes one wonder just what kind of journalism they published while working for the WSJ. I know that Simpson & Jacoby wrote several anti-Manafort/Ukraine articles in the past that may have contributed to some of the info in the dossier, but I wonder if anyone has ever scrutinized their contributions while at the WSJ.
I always regarded the WSJ as being solid RINO to Republican learning. Perhaps I was mistaken.
Mockingbird all over againaggiehawg said:That ended during Bush 43's second term.Quote:
These 4 Fusion GPS principals were former WSJ journalists. Makes one wonder just what kind of journalism they published while working for the WSJ. I know that Simpson & Jacoby wrote several anti-Manafort/Ukraine articles in the past that may have contributed to some of the info in the dossier, but I wonder if anyone has ever scrutinized their contributions while at the WSJ.
I always regarded the WSJ as being solid RINO to Republican learning. Perhaps I was mistaken.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/18/us/politics/hillary-clinton-emails-fbi.htmlQuote:
The new batch of documents indicated that in one particular case, a senior State Department official, Patrick F. Kennedy, pressed the F.B.I. to agree that one of Mrs. Clinton's emails on the 2012 Benghazi attack would be unclassified and not classified as the bureau wanted.
What remained unclear from the documents was whether it was Mr. Kennedy or an F.B.I. official who purportedly offered the "quid pro quo": marking the email unclassified in exchange for the State Department's approving the posting of more F.B.I. agents to Iraq.
Officials at both the F.B.I. and the State Department said Monday that no deal had been struck, or even offered, over the classification of Mrs. Clinton's private emails. They noted that the Benghazi email in question had been made public with a sentence blocked out, meeting the F.B.I.'s demand for classification. They also said no additional F.B.I. agents had been posted overseas.
Good point. Today, every national media source is tilted either left or right. That a good thing for cognitive citizens capable of weighing evidence ... but it's a bad thing for our country because most Americans form their opinions based on 10-second sound bites.RoscoePColtrane said:
Point I am reaching for was how complicit the WaPo, NYT, and the WSJ were in controlling the narrative, until they were relieved as the gatekeeper, and they all of a sudden ran with every story they could either dig up or manufacture.
And as predicted, POTUS is going to do the same thing Barry did with the Stimulus for shovel ready jobs. Redirect the Omnibus funds as he sees fit. And the left will throw a fit and try to throw up a block in court, but there is precedent from the last administration. Barry ran the government 8 years without a full budget passed.Tailgate88 said:
Anyone care to explain what this is about?
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/text-letter-president-speaker-house-representatives-president-senate-21/
Omnibus acts aren't Constitutionally passed budgets. Trump can futz with them. And he just did, apparently.Tailgate88 said:
Anyone care to explain what this is about?
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/text-letter-president-speaker-house-representatives-president-senate-21/
Sort of. Not a lot can get accomplished before September 30, I think.Wendy 1990 said:
So does this mean that Trump will divert the money to the wall?
RoscoePColtrane said:
There is going to be a lot of crow served up to a bunch of pundits that were jumping ship over this omnibus bill.
"Shovel-ready wasn't as shovel-ready as we thought." President of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama.RoscoePColtrane said:Tailgate88 said:
And as predicted, POTUS is going to do the same thing Barry did with the Stimulus for shovel ready jobs. Redirect the Omnibus funds as he sees fit. And the left will throw a fit and try to throw up a block in court, but there is precedent from the last administration. Barry ran the government 8 years without a full budget passed.
Sign contracts, place $ in irrevocable escrow per contract terms, and then release $ based on progress complete ... that's how it could be accomplished in the private sector.aggiehawg said:Sort of. Not a lot can get accomplished before September 30, I think.Wendy 1990 said:
So does this mean that Trump will divert the money to the wall?
Quote:
Ex-FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe admitted Saturday he was "confused and distracted" when he talked to investigators about alleged misconduct during a 2016 investigation of the Trump campaign.
McCabe "lacked candor" in that interview, Attorney General Jeff Sessions determined, and fired him March 16, two days before he would have been eligible for a pension.
"Some of my answers were not fully accurate," McCabe admitted in a Washington Post op-ed, but insisted, "I did not knowingly mislead or lie to investigators.
"When asked about contacts with a reporter that were fully within my power to authorize . . . I answered questions as completely and accurately as I could," said McCabe, who was accused of leaking material to the Wall Street Journal.
He added that when he realized that his answers "may have been misunderstood," he tried to correct them.
"At worst, I was not clear in my responses, and because of what was going on around me may well have been confused and distracted and for that I take full responsibility," McCabe said, adding that his misstatements don't justify President Trump's "unhinged public attacks on me."
It's discredited by Byron York HERE.Quote:
Lately Democrats have accused Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee of prematurely shutting down the Trump-Russia investigation without interviewing many key witnesses. The committee "obtained either no or incomplete information about 81 percent of the known contacts between Trump officials and Russians, or groups and individuals with strong Russia ties like WikiLeaks," NBC reported Thursday.
"The House Intelligence Committee shuttered its investigation today, concluding they had found no evidence of collusion," NBC's Heidi Przbyla said on "Hardball." "We'll have a new report showing they overlooked 81 percent of the known contacts between Trump officials and the Russians."
RoscoePColtrane said:
Poor little snowflake..... "I was confused", curious to how confused he was when he sat on the Weiner laptop, or altered the Flynn 302's, or when he lied under oath to Congress.....Quote:
Ex-FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe admitted Saturday he was "confused and distracted" when he talked to investigators about alleged misconduct during a 2016 investigation of the Trump campaign.
McCabe "lacked candor" in that interview, Attorney General Jeff Sessions determined, and fired him March 16, two days before he would have been eligible for a pension.
"Some of my answers were not fully accurate," McCabe admitted in a Washington Post op-ed, but insisted, "I did not knowingly mislead or lie to investigators.
"When asked about contacts with a reporter that were fully within my power to authorize . . . I answered questions as completely and accurately as I could," said McCabe, who was accused of leaking material to the Wall Street Journal.
He added that when he realized that his answers "may have been misunderstood," he tried to correct them.
"At worst, I was not clear in my responses, and because of what was going on around me may well have been confused and distracted and for that I take full responsibility," McCabe said, adding that his misstatements don't justify President Trump's "unhinged public attacks on me."
https://nypost.com/2018/03/24/mccabe-i-was-confused-in-interview-with-investigators/?utm_source=twitter_sitebuttons&utm_medium=site%20buttons&utm_campaign=site%20buttons
The Moscow Project = initiative funded by the Center for American Progress Action Fund = a sister organization of the Center for American Progress = founded by none other than John Podesta.aggiehawg said:
Posting this link now in anticipation that this Dem talking point will come up on Chuck Todd's show.It's discredited by Byron York HERE.Quote:
Lately Democrats have accused Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee of prematurely shutting down the Trump-Russia investigation without interviewing many key witnesses. The committee "obtained either no or incomplete information about 81 percent of the known contacts between Trump officials and Russians, or groups and individuals with strong Russia ties like WikiLeaks," NBC reported Thursday.
"The House Intelligence Committee shuttered its investigation today, concluding they had found no evidence of collusion," NBC's Heidi Przbyla said on "Hardball." "We'll have a new report showing they overlooked 81 percent of the known contacts between Trump officials and the Russians."
Tailgate88 said:
Anyone care to explain what this is about?
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/text-letter-president-speaker-house-representatives-president-senate-21/