Popular guy, that Dagon. pic.twitter.com/cL2K30pv0s
— la cosa jostra (@codyave) May 4, 2022
Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts
7,754,641 Views |
49423 Replies |
Last: 7 min ago by will25u
"The judge asked Durham prosecutor Jonathan Algor whether Durham would come back for the other 1,500 documents if he ended up agreeing with the prosecution about these 38 records. Algor said 'not for this trial' but left the door open for the future..." https://t.co/jY8Yz4GUiw pic.twitter.com/2UyPHxyf9c
— la cosa jostra (@codyave) May 4, 2022
so what does this mean?will25u said:"The judge asked Durham prosecutor Jonathan Algor whether Durham would come back for the other 1,500 documents if he ended up agreeing with the prosecution about these 38 records. Algor said 'not for this trial' but left the door open for the future..." https://t.co/jY8Yz4GUiw pic.twitter.com/2UyPHxyf9c
— la cosa jostra (@codyave) May 4, 2022
Does it mean that "if" Sussman changes his plea to guilty that Durham will just go after the next guy? My view is that Durham wants to subpoena these people in the trial and put them under oath so he can flush out their previous lies before he moves to the next person...
this could get real interesting real fast
Other indictments coming down or already filed under seal.Quote:
so what does this mean?
aggiehawg said:Other indictments coming down or already filed under seal.Quote:
so what does this mean?
aggiehawg said:Other indictments coming down or already filed under seal.Quote:
so what does this mean?
Bird Poo
Joined:
Nov 16, 2005
Posts:
20,249
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Given the way Durham's team seems to operate, I would put my money on already filed under seal.
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
aggiehawg said:Other indictments coming down or already filed under seal.Quote:
so what does this mean?
The court order granting immunity to Fusion GPS's Laura Seago has been unsealed.
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 4, 2022
And here is the newly unsealed motion to compel Seago's testimony [in the Sussmann case], filed by Special Counsel Durham back in April 2022.https://t.co/Vg4ZdOP7fW pic.twitter.com/TzqEb2eaHo
Judge Cooper quoted from an email by Fritsch to a reporter in October 2016 in which the Fusion co-founder said to “do the f***ing Alfa bank secret comms story."
— Durham is Coming (@Durham_isComing) May 4, 2022
The judge said: “How is that assisting Mr. Elias providing legal advice? … That is assisting a media strategy.” pic.twitter.com/NUAqN0aDEn
Hope he gets a bus load and fills a whole wing in a Federal prison!aggiehawg said:Other indictments coming down or already filed under seal.Quote:
so what does this mean?
No deals
These people are stupid.
These people are stupid.
Who is John Galt?
2026
2026
Ol' Coop better make sure he makes it known he is not suicidal.
aggiehawg said:Other indictments coming down or already filed under seal.Quote:
so what does this mean?
The interesting thing is that Durham went to the jennifer Hodge in the criminal division for approval to do so. He could have gone to someone higher up but I think there is an understanding who can't be trusted at Doj and who in doj knows better than to involve themselves
— Mccabe's Porsche on Blocks (@Larry_Beech) May 4, 2022
This is how things normally go in criminal cases - the Govt wins most of what it wants, especially on decisions about the admission of evidence.
— Leslie McAdoo Gordon ⚖️ 👠🇺🇸 (@McAdooGordon) May 5, 2022
John Durham scores two major court wins ahead of Clinton lawyer’s trial | Just The News https://t.co/qj7Mpy9smf
Anticipating some motions by Joffe to be unsealed.
— UndeadFOIA (@UndeadFoia) May 5, 2022
Ill be busy the next couple days, follow Techno or Fool for any news that breaks.
SwigAg11
Joined:
Dec 11, 2012
Posts:
5,303
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It was amazing how much better your nine word sentence made my day yesterday.aggiehawg said:Other indictments coming down or already filed under seal.Quote:
so what does this mean?
I didn't know that. Interesting.
Of course FusionGPS’s and Steele’s role wasn’t linked to providing legal advice or preparing for litigation. But even if they sometimes wore a legal “hat” (not!), the party invoking privilege bears the burden of proving it applies to each separate communication. Ain’t happening. https://t.co/PxU63ctsRY
— FoiaFan (@15poundstogo) May 5, 2022
Thread about "imaginary anonymous source" that a journalist uses to spread misinformation.
@nytmike We have learned in past year that Sussmann took Alfa Bank and related DNS hoax claims to CIA in early Feb 2017. And that Fusion and Daniel Jones were promoting these false claims. Was your story connected to these hoaxes? Is that why it doesn't appear in your book?
— Stephen McIntyre (@ClimateAudit) May 5, 2022
For those not familiar with Pacer, "missing" is not suspect--it means under seal or ex parte. https://t.co/0OZpDwU6Cg
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) May 5, 2022
What kind of things could these "missing" things be? Sealed indictments hopefully....?Secolobo said:For those not familiar with Pacer, "missing" is not suspect--it means under seal or ex parte. https://t.co/0OZpDwU6Cg
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) May 5, 2022
Perjury charges for each of the people filing privilege briefs claiming that Fusion was providing "legal advice"?Tailgate88 said:What kind of things could these "missing" things be? Sealed indictments hopefully....?Secolobo said:For those not familiar with Pacer, "missing" is not suspect--it means under seal or ex parte. https://t.co/0OZpDwU6Cg
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) May 5, 2022
Or would perjury only apply to verbal testimony? What would apply to filing briefs with false claims in them with the court?txags92 said:Perjury charges for each of the people filing privilege briefs claiming that Fusion was providing "legal advice"?Tailgate88 said:What kind of things could these "missing" things be? Sealed indictments hopefully....?Secolobo said:For those not familiar with Pacer, "missing" is not suspect--it means under seal or ex parte. https://t.co/0OZpDwU6Cg
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) May 5, 2022
If there are sworn affidavits attached? Possible. Anything written in a brief and signed by only attorneys? No.txags92 said:Or would perjury only apply to verbal testimony? What would apply to filing briefs with false claims in them with the court?txags92 said:Perjury charges for each of the people filing privilege briefs claiming that Fusion was providing "legal advice"?Tailgate88 said:What kind of things could these "missing" things be? Sealed indictments hopefully....?Secolobo said:For those not familiar with Pacer, "missing" is not suspect--it means under seal or ex parte. https://t.co/0OZpDwU6Cg
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) May 5, 2022
That's not saying the court couldn't admonish the attorneys for lying to the court, however.
We have the transcript from yesterday's fight over "privileged" Fusion GPS emails.
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) May 5, 2022
Key passage-
Clinton Campaign lawyer was asked if he knew of any emails supporting their claim that Fusion was "providing legal support"
Clinton lawyer: "I don't"https://t.co/Ry3rYm0TSV
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
Wow, the chutzpah of these traitors!
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
Sounds like lying to me.Quote:
Clinton Campaign lawyer was asked if he knew of any emails supporting their claim that Fusion was "providing legal support"
Clinton lawyer: "I don't"
Sussmann just filed his objections to Durham's exhibit list, of interest is the Novick records. Jared Novick was CEO of BitVoyant through 2016, a company Raymond Saulino was a "Manager" of. Was he also CEO of Packet Forensics at the time (if there's a difference between the two)? pic.twitter.com/c3EnMCttKj
— FOOL NELSON (@FOOL_NELSON) May 6, 2022
Link: https://t.co/gwi6Fe2qc5
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) May 6, 2022
Seems like Sussman wants to go with the old "dazzle them with BS ploy" to obfuscate what is at the heart of the case.
Who is John Galt?
2026
2026
Ga Tech Foia documents reveal cyber-security experts believed CrowdStrike's methodology suspect. But did their own analysis of DNC hack provided to DARPA reach the same conclusion? They refuse to say. @FDRLST https://t.co/c6dEMKJ5UR
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) May 6, 2022
Featured Stories
See All
LIVE: No. 7 Texas A&M at No. 21 Mississippi State
by Luke Evangelist
Aggies meet Bulldogs in Starkville for another ranked SEC showdown
by Olin Buchanan
Presenting Texas Aggies United's 'Florida Slam Dunk' Sweepstakes!
by Texas Aggies United
20:19
9h ago
3.2k
AggieCVQ
Aaron Torres Podcast: Blow Hard Guest With Harsh Words For Buzz Williams
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
55