Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,746,886 Views | 49415 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by fasthorse05
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Of course most on this thread knew the Crowdstrike analysis was total BS. Seth Rich was murdered to cover up the fact DNC server wasn't hacked. Crowdstrike was hired to "validate" the hacking BS.
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?



dreyOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He wants the jury to see all the WAPO stories they planted and conspired to create? No ****

These people have been caught. Just painfully slow process
txags92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So am I misunderstanding his angle here? He is being charged with lying to the FBI for telling them he wasn't working for a client on the cyber stuff he brought them...but he wants to admit a bunch of evidence that he...was working for a client on the cyber stuff he brought them? Isn't he basically confessing that he lied by admitting this as evidence?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How Convenient.

MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why was the Chicago FBI cyber security team involved?

Think back fellas to all the servers that Bill Binney flushed out by focusing on the metadata that CrowdStrike presented representing the so called Guccifer 2.0 DNC hack.

Binney claimed that CrowdStrike's disinformation agent altered metadata in the files released by Guccifer 2.0 who all the US intelligence community identified as a Russian military intelligence operation to make it appear as if the documents came from a computer in the Eastern Ukraine, not Russia when in fact the files originated locally.

Binney said specifically, the local time zone of the actual computer's system clock was changed from UTC06:00 to UTC+3. Binney also said he'd detected pinging from servers in Chicago and Phoenix.

This is the same time Binney was disputing the download times that were imbedded in the metadata saying it was impossible to achieve those speeds across the trunk especially out of Ukraine. He was the first to point out that that those DNC emails were downloaded by someone with local direct server access to a direct media and not across the fiber trunk across the Atlantic.

Binney was adamant about what they did because they were using the toolbox that he developed years prior. The same toolbox that Snowden exposed.

Pompeo was the CIA chief then and appeared multiple times on Fox saying Binney was making unfounded claims that weren't provable. Then Binney made the mistake of appearing on infowars and was immediately labeled as a quack and we went dark again, because none of the networks would give him a platform to defend himself. Not even Hannity or Tucker.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Once again, I've got a sidebar, but with all the money we've sent Ukraine (last was $33 billion), I wonder if Zelensky has told the Dems to keep sending money, or else I'll reveal your shenanigans?

Just a thought.

I mean, Zelensky already has approximately $900 million. I guess you can't play on the world stage unless you're over $1B.
Secolobo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why else would pelosi and schiff go over.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fasthorse05 said:

Once again, I've got a sidebar, but with all the money we've sent Ukraine (last was $33 billion), I wonder if Zelensky has told the Dems to keep sending money, or else I'll reveal your shenanigans?

Just a thought.

I mean, Zelensky already has approximately $900 million. I guess you can't play on the world stage unless you're over $1B.
3 Toed Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Secolobo said:

Why else would pelosi and schiff go over.
The entire Senate Intelligence Committee is corrupted in Ukraine and so you can't count on or believe any of them regarding anything. And apparently that extends to other areas, such as State, some NSC, etc.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree, it's just so damned disheartening.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fasthorse05 said:

Once again, I've got a sidebar, but with all the money we've sent Ukraine (last was $33 billion), I wonder if Zelensky has told the Dems to keep sending money, or else I'll reveal your shenanigans?

Just a thought.

I mean, Zelensky already has approximately $900 million. I guess you can't play on the world stage unless you're over $1B.
Remember the servers that Zelensky's predecessor somehow made disappear. Trump mentioned them to Zelensky, and those servers were maintained by CrowdStrike. Zelensky said the room that once held the Ukraine government servers was empty, sans any equipment, not just wiped, completely gone.

If you recall after Binney began exposing the metadata funny business, and was target by the spook community, John McAfee came forward backing up Binney's claims. McAfee kept saying he had inside knowledge personally that backed up the claims. Most people considered McAfee as a kook but in reality he was a contract spook and his company was a storefront for spook activity both foreign and domestically, which is illegal by the way. And who was the founder of CrowdStrike?

Dmitri Alperovitch, and where did he work for years prior to establishing CrowdStrike? McAfee Inc. as vice president of threat research!!!! Damn straight John McAfee has inside knowledge into CrowdStrike and especially Dmitri Alperovitch.

Trump was adamant that Ukraine was in possession of the DNC server as well as Hillary Clinton's deleted emails, and of course the swamp machine labeled it all as a conspiracy theory as they did everything else.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
Secolobo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If we only had another thread….

(I might add that you can't even search for that thread. It's not just locked. Only if you go to your thread history and the title of that thread pops up but there is nothing there when you try to open it. Nada. No tweets, articles, nada.)
Whitetail
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Secolobo said:

If we only had another thread….

(I might add that you can't even search for that thread. It's not just locked. Only if you go to your thread history and the title of that thread pops up but there is nothing there when you try to open it. Nada. No tweets, articles, nada.)


More and more of that thread is coming true. But instead of restoring it…reeeeeeee conspiracies!
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Secolobo said:

If we only had another thread….

(I might add that you can't even search for that thread. It's not just locked. Only if you go to your thread history and the title of that thread pops up but there is nothing there when you try to open it. Nada. No tweets, articles, nada.)


I heard that Elon is coming to yell practice and might buy a college sports fan forum.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good thread to read about what Durham is up against with a DC jury.

whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Please explain again WHY the trial has to be in DC. Does a Special Counsel not have authority as to where he/she can try their case?
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whatthehey78 said:

Please explain again WHY the trial has to be in DC. Does a Special Counsel not have authority as to where he/she can try their case?


To avoid any jurisdictional challenges especially going down the conspiracy route where almost everything center it's origins in the swamp
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thread. Larry pondering possible Durham funding issues? May be nothing... May be Durham is underfunded. Should be getting the SCO funding info update soon.

BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whatthehey78 said:

Please explain again WHY the trial has to be in DC. Does a Special Counsel not have authority as to where he/she can try their case?


They can't choose anywhere.

Has to be where crime occurred or where defendant is
FJB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

Thread. Larry pondering possible Durham funding issues? May be nothing... May be Durham is underfunded. Should be getting the SCO funding info update soon.


Can we just crowdfund it like Zuckerburg did with the election? You know, patriotism and all that?
Who is John Galt?

2026
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well crap!

Between a derby horse winning with 82-1 odds and the Ags being down 9-0 in the 4th, only to come back and win with 2 outs in the 9th, this sucks.

What I would like from our resident legals is how common is this type of decision? As much as I hate government, and would normally love this type of decision that kicks the government in the balls, I'm always suspicious of a Dem appointed judge.
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Charge them all!
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FJB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can they just subpoena them to testify?
Who is John Galt?

2026
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FJB said:

Can they just subpoena them to testify?


Easily
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FJB said:

Can they just subpoena them to testify?


Yes but I believe they will say that they don't remember anything about the meeting.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

FJB said:

Can they just subpoena them to testify?


Yes but I believe they will say that they don't remember anything about the meeting.
They can try to say that but I believe more likely they take the 5th. Were I their criminal lawyer, that is what I would advise.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

FJB said:

Can they just subpoena them to testify?


Yes but I believe they will say that they don't remember anything about the meeting.


Not sure they'd like taking that route with their handwritten notes in as evidence, make them authenticate the notes under oath then the notes are available to use as recollection tool.

They best plead the fifth, but then could face in trial immunity making their fifth plea moot. Interested to see how Durham handles that.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

They best plead the fifth, but then could face in trial immunity making their fifth plea moot. Interested to see how Durham handles that.
Only way to "handle that" is for Durham to grant them immunity. If they are the subject of or have already been indicted and it is sealed, that can't happen.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First Page Last Page
Page 1366 of 1412
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.