That's all fine but we better make DAMN sure not to let the Dems steal the election because if Trump doesn't win this all goes away.
Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts
7,754,512 Views |
49422 Replies |
Last: 1 day ago by Secolobo
Between the Comey brothers corruption and no indictments leak it is a sad day for justice in the USA. I keep getting my hopes up for justice but continually get slammed back to reality.
I am not certain at this point that even a win by President Trump can stem the tide of corruption in the Democratic, Republican and bureaucratic swamp.
Evil people like Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Schumer, Nadler, Swallwell, Soros, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Ohr, plus many more and their useful idiots are on the verge of destroying the Republic.
I am not certain at this point that even a win by President Trump can stem the tide of corruption in the Democratic, Republican and bureaucratic swamp.
Evil people like Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Schumer, Nadler, Swallwell, Soros, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Ohr, plus many more and their useful idiots are on the verge of destroying the Republic.
Better if pre-election but unlikely to tilt the "undecided" 5-10% goofballs anyway ... meanwhile indictments, guilty pleas, and agreements will continue to pile up for Nov/Dec.MooreTrucker said:
No indictments, but possibly charges and guilty pleas. Isn't that at least almost as good?
It WILL make the holiday season much more enjoyable.
Not a time to give up, because you have that part wrong. No indictments reported before the election, doesn't mean there won't be other things going on, like the info coming out now about the Clinton Foundation.richardag said:
Between the Comey brothers corruption and no indictments leak it is a sad day for justice in the USA. I keep getting my hopes up for justice but continually get slammed back to reality.
I am not certain at this point that even a win by President Trump can stem the tide of corruption in the Democratic, Republican and bureaucratic swamp.
Evil people like Obama, Biden, Pelosi, Schumer, Nadler, Swallwell, Soros, Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Ohr, plus many more and their useful idiots are on the verge of destroying the Republic.
And remember, Trump and Q and others have been talking about election stealing, etc. for quite a while, which tells me they know what's coming and how to head it off.
I'll eat crow if it turns out as you said, but IMO the Republic is safe. Society in general is totally screwed because of "what I identify as" non-binary gender sickness, etc. but most if not all of the people you list will suffer in one way or another, legally, reputationally, or otherwise.
Stzok attorney claiming they are doctored. Ok
Really? How so? Did they say?BMX Bandit said:
Stzok attorney claiming they are doctored. Ok
BMX Bandit said:
Stzok attorney claiming they are doctored. Ok
At this point, Strzok should be given the Flynn treatment. You get no attorney and everything about your past will be viewed with the most illegal spin possible and you get zero defense ever.
That guy should look at the sky everyday he can, I hope by the end of this, he is given the Count of Monte Cristo experience... only he never gets out.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
Joined:
Apr 13, 2004
Posts:
44,891
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BMX Bandit said:
Stzok attorney claiming they are doctored. Ok
Can just anyone file a brief with the court at this point? Hell, I might as well get my 2 cents in
Shear audacity....
Can I go to sleep Looch?
BMX Bandit said:
Stzok attorney claiming they are doctored. Ok
Bold move Cotten.
This another attempt to give cover to Sullivan to delay again?
Sure seems like they want Flynn gagged and on the sidelines until post election
Sure seems like they want Flynn gagged and on the sidelines until post election
Those are not Strzok's notes, those are FBI evidence that comprise annotations of Strozk's notes. If the dates inferred by someone reading them later are wrong, it's simply evidence Strozk's notes kind of sucked (which someone suggested above).Que Te Gusta Mas said:
Edit: Fat fingered the post icon.
PatentMike, J.D.
BS Biochem
MS Molecular Virology
BS Biochem
MS Molecular Virology
Confused. What are the redactions for then?Quote:
Those are not Strzok's notes, those are FBI evidence that comprise annotations of Strozk's notes. If the dates inferred by someone reading them later are wrong, it's simply evidence Strozk's notes kind of sucked (which someone suggested above).
Let me explain. Sullivan wanted to conduct an evidentiary hearing, with witnesses and all. That was evident with his Minute Order appointing Gleeson as amicus.
Obviously that cannot happen tomorrow with such short notice. It just can't. So granting leave to file the Strzok BS buys time to reschedule that hearing because a factual issue has been raised by Strzok's attorney. One only the judge can decide at this juncture.
If anyone still thinks Sullivan is a white hat at this point, they are certifiably insane. He's not. And Sullivan is diabolical in his machinations. Pure evil and using his bench for lawfare, not justice.
Obviously that cannot happen tomorrow with such short notice. It just can't. So granting leave to file the Strzok BS buys time to reschedule that hearing because a factual issue has been raised by Strzok's attorney. One only the judge can decide at this juncture.
If anyone still thinks Sullivan is a white hat at this point, they are certifiably insane. He's not. And Sullivan is diabolical in his machinations. Pure evil and using his bench for lawfare, not justice.
Their projection is showingBMX Bandit said:
Stzok attorney claiming they are doctored. Ok
NO AMNESTY!
in order for democrats, liberals, progressives et al to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things; by pretending "not to know" there is no guilt, no actual connection to conscience. Denial of truth allows easier trespass.
in order for democrats, liberals, progressives et al to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things; by pretending "not to know" there is no guilt, no actual connection to conscience. Denial of truth allows easier trespass.
Evidence is evidence, peanut gallery does not get to add commentary hearsay
Not sure that applies anymore in DClaw-apt-3g said:
Evidence is evidence, peanut gallery does not get to add commentary hearsay
There is seldom evidentiary hearing when DOJ moves to dismiss charges. As in, hardly ever.law-apt-3g said:
Evidence is evidence, peanut gallery does not get to add commentary hearsay
whatthehey78 said:Not sure that applies anymore in DClaw-apt-3g said:
Evidence is evidence, peanut gallery does not get to add commentary hearsay
Rab nailed it, I'll say it: projecting panic the dots leading to Barry
You telling me you never annotated someone else's document, thus creating one of your own? Privileges/redactions carry over to the new one, yes?aggiehawg said:Confused. What are the redactions for then?Quote:
Those are not Strzok's notes, those are FBI evidence that comprise annotations of Strozk's notes. If the dates inferred by someone reading them later are wrong, it's simply evidence Strozk's notes kind of sucked (which someone suggested above).
PatentMike, J.D.
BS Biochem
MS Molecular Virology
BS Biochem
MS Molecular Virology
Contracts, sure.Quote:
You telling me you never annotated someone else's document, thus creating one of your own? Privileges/redactions carry over to the new one, yes?
But hand written notes by another? I'd copy them first and work off of the copy. The original notes could be evidence, my copy was protected work product.
Excellent point. They were so desperate to get Flynn, they kept conflating criminal and counter-intel tools.will25u said:
But the simpler answer is that had they applied to a federal judge for a warrant under the Logan Act, the judge most likely would have refused and laughed them out of court.
That law is not only antiquated but unconstitutional, although it has never been officially declared so. Would need a criminal case to have been brought and gone through the appeals process to have it declared unconstitutional. No one has been stupid enough to do so yet.
Featured Stories
See All
LIVE: No. 7 Texas A&M at No. 21 Mississippi State
by Luke Evangelist
Aggies meet Bulldogs in Starkville for another ranked SEC showdown
by Olin Buchanan
Presenting Texas Aggies United's 'Florida Slam Dunk' Sweepstakes!
by Texas Aggies United
20:19
9h ago
3.1k
AggieCVQ
Aaron Torres Podcast: Blow Hard Guest With Harsh Words For Buzz Williams
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
53