Mr_mo8268 said:
Has it been proven Paddock shot at the fuel tanks to blow them up? Seems like an assumption to me. Two bullets allegedly hit the tanks. No proven motive or if bullets actually hit the tank from Paddock, or if it's more bs from the Feds and media to fit the narrative.
CNN was saying earlier today that he had fired "incendiary rounds" at the tanks.
Now, since this is CNN they could be completely wrong, could be talking back tracers, or correct.
Regardless, tracers or incendiaries would not have caused an explosion unless the tanks were almost empty and mostly filled with vapor and enough air to cause a boom.
Also, incendiary and tracer rounds are not easy to obtain, at least not legally.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill