The innocent Palestinians we should weap for.

17,880 Views | 275 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by BonfireNerd04
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pro Sandy said:

SirDippinDots said:

Pro Sandy said:

Ah yes, continuing the justification for genocide against Palestinians.

Hamas is evil and all for the total destruction of that organization of hate. 3 million people in Gaza though are not Hamas and your desire to eradicate them is also horrific.

Christianity Today has an article interviewing Christians on both sides. Is a good short read and might help you understand that the issue is much more complicated than Israel good Gaza bad.
https://christianitytoday.com/news/2023/october/israel-hamas-gaza-war-palestinian-evangelical-messianic-jew.html


Hamas is the elected government of Gaza.
If an elected official of the US committed war crimes, would killing you be justified?


If that leader was hiding behind me while trying to kill your entire society/ethnicity, yes. And my death would be his fault.

It's a terrible thing but evil cannot be allowed to successfully utilize the innocent for ransom or quarter. I don't like it but it's the only possible option in a just society. And this isn't support for indiscriminate killing, but if wiping out Hamas requires Palestinian civilians die because of their decision to use their own population as human shields and for propaganda then it must be done.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ramblin_ag02 said:

Dude, just stop. The Nazis were happy to use the Evian conference to say, "Well, no one else in the entire world wants our Jews. So clearly there is something extra bad about them, whatever happens next to them is no big deal." Then they proceeded to Holocaust.

You've made it as far as "No one else in the world wants the Palestinians. So clearly there is something extra bad about them…"

When your point is literally the beginning of a point made by the Nazis to justify the Holocaust, then you might want re-examine the fundamentals of your viewpoint.

As in, people's human worth and dignity is not in any way related to the rest of the world wanting or not wanting to embrace them as refugees. There is no gotcha here that justifies poor treatment of 10 million vulnerable people not counting Hamas.




European Jews didn't have an entire society centered around indoctrinating the idea of exterminating native Europeans and Western society as a whole into their children from birth.

Palestinian cartoons they broadcast on television tell kids they should aspire to killing Jews and wiping them out. Their schools teach children that dying while trying to exterminate the west is the height of martyrdom. They are open and honest about this, they do not try to hide it. It is a society built entirely around a hatred of Jews, Christians and western society as a whole. It is a society that many other Arab nations, no fans of the Jews or the west mind you, look at with disgust and condescension.

THAT is why we cannot afford to take them, and why the rest of the Arab world won't take them. It's not that every Palestinian is a danger, it's that they have constructed a society where any one of them could be.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Infection_Ag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also let's not forget what happened the last time Jordan, Egypt and Lebanon took in a ton of Palestinian refugees. They almost immediately started a civil war in both Jordan AND Lebanon, attempted to assassinate the King of Jordan, and massacred and entire town of Egyptians.

The rest of the Arab world has good reason to not want them.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
SirDippinDots
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Serotonin said:

SirDippinDots said:

Serotonin said:

Looks like Israel just annihilated a Christian hospital.

Reports of at least 500 people killed in the attack on Al-Ahli Arabi Baptist hospital.


Wrong rocket that was launched by peaceful Hamas that failed. And even if it was an accidental Israeli strike this is on hamas.

But I am sure you will ignore it like most and continue your antisemitism.

https://t.me/beholdisraelchannel/19869


Edit: better video below

https://t.me/beholdisraelchannel/19889
The video you posted is from 2022:


Electricity is currently shut off in Gaza so the lights on in various apartments should've been a giveaway.

"But I am sure you will ignore it"


Tv news camera footage. Maybe Palestinians should stick to throwing rocks.


https://t.me/beholdisraelchannel/20004
Serotonin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Both sides are lying to the world to gain moral support but as I said last night, I believe the Israelis here.

I am also skeptical about the overall number of casualties based on new evidence (photographs this morning).

Pray for peace and de-escalation.
SirDippinDots
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Serotonin said:

Both sides are lying to the world to gain moral support but as I said last night, I believe the Israelis here.

I am also skeptical about the overall number of casualties based on new evidence (photographs this morning).

Pray for peace and de-escalation.


I will but the world is heading to violence like the days of Noah.
ramblin_ag02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Infection_Ag11 said:

ramblin_ag02 said:

Dude, just stop. The Nazis were happy to use the Evian conference to say, "Well, no one else in the entire world wants our Jews. So clearly there is something extra bad about them, whatever happens next to them is no big deal." Then they proceeded to Holocaust.

You've made it as far as "No one else in the world wants the Palestinians. So clearly there is something extra bad about them…"

When your point is literally the beginning of a point made by the Nazis to justify the Holocaust, then you might want re-examine the fundamentals of your viewpoint.

As in, people's human worth and dignity is not in any way related to the rest of the world wanting or not wanting to embrace them as refugees. There is no gotcha here that justifies poor treatment of 10 million vulnerable people not counting Hamas.




European Jews didn't have an entire society centered around indoctrinating the idea of exterminating native Europeans and Western society as a whole into their children from birth.

Palestinian cartoons they broadcast on television tell kids they should aspire to killing Jews and wiping them out. Their schools teach children that dying while trying to exterminate the west is the height of martyrdom. They are open and honest about this, they do not try to hide it. It is a society built entirely around a hatred of Jews, Christians and western society as a whole. It is a society that many other Arab nations, no fans of the Jews or the west mind you, look at with disgust and condescension.

THAT is why we cannot afford to take them, and why the rest of the Arab world won't take them. It's not that every Palestinian is a danger, it's that they have constructed a society where any one of them could be.
It takes a unique set of circumstances for a society to go that way. Continual poverty, suffering and despair lower the opportunity cost for suicidal violence. If all you have to look forward to is a miserable life, then why not go out in a literal blaze of glory against the people oppressing you? The solution is making their lives better. Give them something to lose, some stake in their own lives and their own society. They don't have that now.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
BonfireNerd04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ramblin_ag02 said:

Give them something to lose, some stake in their own lives and their own society. They don't have that now.


Whenever the West gives resources to Gaza, Hamas has a habit of using them to build or buy weapons. So how do you plan to avoid that problem?
AgLiving06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ramblin_ag02 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

ramblin_ag02 said:

Dude, just stop. The Nazis were happy to use the Evian conference to say, "Well, no one else in the entire world wants our Jews. So clearly there is something extra bad about them, whatever happens next to them is no big deal." Then they proceeded to Holocaust.

You've made it as far as "No one else in the world wants the Palestinians. So clearly there is something extra bad about them…"

When your point is literally the beginning of a point made by the Nazis to justify the Holocaust, then you might want re-examine the fundamentals of your viewpoint.

As in, people's human worth and dignity is not in any way related to the rest of the world wanting or not wanting to embrace them as refugees. There is no gotcha here that justifies poor treatment of 10 million vulnerable people not counting Hamas.




European Jews didn't have an entire society centered around indoctrinating the idea of exterminating native Europeans and Western society as a whole into their children from birth.

Palestinian cartoons they broadcast on television tell kids they should aspire to killing Jews and wiping them out. Their schools teach children that dying while trying to exterminate the west is the height of martyrdom. They are open and honest about this, they do not try to hide it. It is a society built entirely around a hatred of Jews, Christians and western society as a whole. It is a society that many other Arab nations, no fans of the Jews or the west mind you, look at with disgust and condescension.

THAT is why we cannot afford to take them, and why the rest of the Arab world won't take them. It's not that every Palestinian is a danger, it's that they have constructed a society where any one of them could be.
It takes a unique set of circumstances for a society to go that way. Continual poverty, suffering and despair lower the opportunity cost for suicidal violence. If all you have to look forward to is a miserable life, then why not go out in a literal blaze of glory against the people oppressing you? The solution is making their lives better. Give them something to lose, some stake in their own lives and their own society. They don't have that now.

This is an extremely western way of thinking and a large part of the issue imo.

First, lets be clear, it's not Israel that is "oppressing" the people of Gaza. I'll again point out that Egypt is acting no differently, and maybe worse than Israel and I don't see Hamas lobbing rockets at them. So this is not about "going out in a blaze of glory against your oppressor" but specifically about targeting Jews.

Second, the true oppressor is Hamas. The group that takes Gaza infrastructure and makes missiles from it. That takes the money given to Gaza and buys missiles. The group that bombs their own people to keep them from escaping.

So no, this is not about some poverty group simply looking to go out in a blaze of glory.

Hamas is 100% clear that they are not afraid of death. They see it as victory to see Allah in this fashion. The PLO pays families money for dying for the cause, especially when they kill jews.

The question that needs to be asked is what does a better life look like? Is it "from the river to the sea?" That means no Israel. No jews. That is what Hamas wants and what it teachings to the people of Gaza.

We need to put the CRT nonsense down and start looking at what Hamas is actually saying and how Palestinians and its supporters around the world are actually acting. Not just relying on the western view of "throw aid at it and that will probably work."

ramblin_ag02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgLiving06 said:

ramblin_ag02 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

ramblin_ag02 said:

Dude, just stop. The Nazis were happy to use the Evian conference to say, "Well, no one else in the entire world wants our Jews. So clearly there is something extra bad about them, whatever happens next to them is no big deal." Then they proceeded to Holocaust.

You've made it as far as "No one else in the world wants the Palestinians. So clearly there is something extra bad about them…"

When your point is literally the beginning of a point made by the Nazis to justify the Holocaust, then you might want re-examine the fundamentals of your viewpoint.

As in, people's human worth and dignity is not in any way related to the rest of the world wanting or not wanting to embrace them as refugees. There is no gotcha here that justifies poor treatment of 10 million vulnerable people not counting Hamas.




European Jews didn't have an entire society centered around indoctrinating the idea of exterminating native Europeans and Western society as a whole into their children from birth.

Palestinian cartoons they broadcast on television tell kids they should aspire to killing Jews and wiping them out. Their schools teach children that dying while trying to exterminate the west is the height of martyrdom. They are open and honest about this, they do not try to hide it. It is a society built entirely around a hatred of Jews, Christians and western society as a whole. It is a society that many other Arab nations, no fans of the Jews or the west mind you, look at with disgust and condescension.

THAT is why we cannot afford to take them, and why the rest of the Arab world won't take them. It's not that every Palestinian is a danger, it's that they have constructed a society where any one of them could be.
It takes a unique set of circumstances for a society to go that way. Continual poverty, suffering and despair lower the opportunity cost for suicidal violence. If all you have to look forward to is a miserable life, then why not go out in a literal blaze of glory against the people oppressing you? The solution is making their lives better. Give them something to lose, some stake in their own lives and their own society. They don't have that now.

This is an extremely western way of thinking and a large part of the issue imo.

First, lets be clear, it's not Israel that is "oppressing" the people of Gaza. I'll again point out that Egypt is acting no differently, and maybe worse than Israel and I don't see Hamas lobbing rockets at them. So this is not about "going out in a blaze of glory against your oppressor" but specifically about targeting Jews.

Second, the true oppressor is Hamas. The group that takes Gaza infrastructure and makes missiles from it. That takes the money given to Gaza and buys missiles. The group that bombs their own people to keep them from escaping.

So no, this is not about some poverty group simply looking to go out in a blaze of glory.

Hamas is 100% clear that they are not afraid of death. They see it as victory to see Allah in this fashion. The PLO pays families money for dying for the cause, especially when they kill jews.

The question that needs to be asked is what does a better life look like? Is it "from the river to the sea?" That means no Israel. No jews. That is what Hamas wants and what it teachings to the people of Gaza.

We need to put the CRT nonsense down and start looking at what Hamas is actually saying and how Palestinians and its supporters around the world are actually acting. Not just relying on the western view of "throw aid at it and that will probably work."


Again, suggest an alternative. If you don't think that letting the Palestinians have better lives will improve their overall outlook and make them see the world differently, then how do you propose to undo the cultural indoctrination going on?

BTW, Hamas as the true oppressor is just ridiculous. Hamas has started in 1987 and was mostly impotent until the mid 2000's. Gaza has been under Israeli military occupation since 1967. The whole Zionist influx into the Holy Land really started with gusto after WW1. Israel controls the checkpoints, the security fences, and completely controls all movement inside Gaza as well as in and out of Gaza. Hamas is the latest, worst group in Gaza, but they are still late to the party.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
AgLiving06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ramblin_ag02 said:

AgLiving06 said:

ramblin_ag02 said:

Infection_Ag11 said:

ramblin_ag02 said:

Dude, just stop. The Nazis were happy to use the Evian conference to say, "Well, no one else in the entire world wants our Jews. So clearly there is something extra bad about them, whatever happens next to them is no big deal." Then they proceeded to Holocaust.

You've made it as far as "No one else in the world wants the Palestinians. So clearly there is something extra bad about them…"

When your point is literally the beginning of a point made by the Nazis to justify the Holocaust, then you might want re-examine the fundamentals of your viewpoint.

As in, people's human worth and dignity is not in any way related to the rest of the world wanting or not wanting to embrace them as refugees. There is no gotcha here that justifies poor treatment of 10 million vulnerable people not counting Hamas.




European Jews didn't have an entire society centered around indoctrinating the idea of exterminating native Europeans and Western society as a whole into their children from birth.

Palestinian cartoons they broadcast on television tell kids they should aspire to killing Jews and wiping them out. Their schools teach children that dying while trying to exterminate the west is the height of martyrdom. They are open and honest about this, they do not try to hide it. It is a society built entirely around a hatred of Jews, Christians and western society as a whole. It is a society that many other Arab nations, no fans of the Jews or the west mind you, look at with disgust and condescension.

THAT is why we cannot afford to take them, and why the rest of the Arab world won't take them. It's not that every Palestinian is a danger, it's that they have constructed a society where any one of them could be.
It takes a unique set of circumstances for a society to go that way. Continual poverty, suffering and despair lower the opportunity cost for suicidal violence. If all you have to look forward to is a miserable life, then why not go out in a literal blaze of glory against the people oppressing you? The solution is making their lives better. Give them something to lose, some stake in their own lives and their own society. They don't have that now.

This is an extremely western way of thinking and a large part of the issue imo.

First, lets be clear, it's not Israel that is "oppressing" the people of Gaza. I'll again point out that Egypt is acting no differently, and maybe worse than Israel and I don't see Hamas lobbing rockets at them. So this is not about "going out in a blaze of glory against your oppressor" but specifically about targeting Jews.

Second, the true oppressor is Hamas. The group that takes Gaza infrastructure and makes missiles from it. That takes the money given to Gaza and buys missiles. The group that bombs their own people to keep them from escaping.

So no, this is not about some poverty group simply looking to go out in a blaze of glory.

Hamas is 100% clear that they are not afraid of death. They see it as victory to see Allah in this fashion. The PLO pays families money for dying for the cause, especially when they kill jews.

The question that needs to be asked is what does a better life look like? Is it "from the river to the sea?" That means no Israel. No jews. That is what Hamas wants and what it teachings to the people of Gaza.

We need to put the CRT nonsense down and start looking at what Hamas is actually saying and how Palestinians and its supporters around the world are actually acting. Not just relying on the western view of "throw aid at it and that will probably work."


Again, suggest an alternative. If you don't think that letting the Palestinians have better lives will improve their overall outlook and make them see the world differently, then how do you propose to undo the cultural indoctrination going on?

BTW, Hamas as the true oppressor is just ridiculous. Hamas has started in 1987 and was mostly impotent until the mid 2000's. Gaza has been under Israeli military occupation since 1967. The whole Zionist influx into the Holy Land really started with gusto after WW1. Israel controls the checkpoints, the security fences, and completely controls all movement inside Gaza as well as in and out of Gaza. Hamas is the latest, worst group in Gaza, but they are still late to the party.
Hamas is absolutely the true oppressor.

Lets start with your own premise: "The solution is to make their life better."

Hamas has been the political party in charge since 2007. That's 16 years with the opportunity to improve life in Gaza for the citizens.

During that 16 years, has Hamas "made life better in Gaza?"

Is removing water infrastructure and building missiles from it good or bad for the citizens of Gaza?
Is taking the money from aid, taxes, etc and using it to build 300+ miles of underground tunnels for terror good or bad for Gaza?
Is hiding military installations in civilian housing, schools, hospitals good or bad for the citizens of Gaza?
Is lobbing missiles at Israel (but not Egypt for some reason) good or bad for the citizens of Gaza?
Is Hamas paying families of suicide bombers good or bad for the citizens of Gaza?
Etc, etc, etc.

I'm left thinking about your question and wondering, in the past 16 years, what has Hamas done for Gaza to "make their life better?" Or did we lose 16 years of making things better and instead likely saw 16 years of radicalizing a group under the control of terrorists?
--------------

But in terms of alternatives. It's not going to be easy. As I said, they've been radicalized for 16 years. Someone else pointed out that everything they see, and are taught to hate the jews. The indoctrination of this group has been thorough and horrible and it's going to take a long time to unravel. But it has to start with removing the true oppressor, Hamas, from the equation if we are even going to have a chance of starting.


ramblin_ag02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's like calling the IRA "the true oppressors of Ireland" even though the English conquered Ireland in 1169 and the IRA was founded in 1922. Hamas (like the IRA) is a symptom of a bigger conflict. It's not the cause. They are making things worse, but they are not the only people making things worse. When it comes to the ability to make the life of Palestinians better or worse, Israel has 1000x times the power to do that than Hamas does.

So how do you get rid of Hamas? And what after that? Is your answer to violence more violence? How does that square with you as a Christian? As far as I can tell there are only 3 options. Genocide/ethnic cleansing, continual warfare, and peaceful coexistence. Each plan, policy and action is going to end up with one of those three. Which category do you think "violently eradicate Hamas and figure out the rest later" falls into?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The problem is peaceful coexistence requires compromise on positions neither side is willing to bend. Palestinians will never accept the loss of their perceived right of return; Israel will never give it. Israel will never accept anything that could result in a significant demographic or power shift in Israel. It is an explicitly Jewish state. The core of the conflict remains that the zionist movement settled in a land that was already inhabited. The Palestinians are a conquered people. Israel isn't going to undo that. Vae victus - but we don't have point to that and say it's good.
AgLiving06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ramblin_ag02 said:

That's like calling the IRA "the true oppressors of Ireland" even though the English conquered Ireland in 1169 and the IRA was founded in 1922. Hamas (like the IRA) is a symptom of a bigger conflict. It's not the cause. They are making things worse, but they are not the only people making things worse. When it comes to the ability to make the life of Palestinians better or worse, Israel has 1000x times the power to do that than Hamas does.

So how do you get rid of Hamas? And what after that? Is your answer to violence more violence? How does that square with you as a Christian? As far as I can tell there are only 3 options. Genocide/ethnic cleansing, continual warfare, and peaceful coexistence. Each plan, policy and action is going to end up with one of those three. Which category do you think "violently eradicate Hamas and figure out the rest later" falls into?

If those are the only three options (they aren't), we can remove Genocide/ethnic cleansing and peaceful coexistence from the list and so you are advocating for continual warfare.

But as a Christian, we understand there are two kingdoms under God. the spiritual and the secular. Christians have always understood that in the secular realm, it is the duty of the leaders to protect its citizens. Every major group has an understanding of just war and protecting their citizens.

And your example with the IRA is flawed. England claimed control of the territory and the IRA fought against that. Nobody is claiming Gaza. Nobody wants it. Israel tried to give it to Egypt, who said no. Israel left the Gaza in 2007. The sole ruler, occupier, and oppressor of Gaza for the past 16 years has been Hamas.

So again, since you didn't answer my questions,

During that 16 years, has Hamas "made life better in Gaza?"

Is removing water infrastructure and building missiles from it good or bad for the citizens of Gaza?
Is taking the money from aid, taxes, etc and using it to build 300+ miles of underground tunnels for terror good or bad for Gaza?
Is hiding military installations in civilian housing, schools, hospitals good or bad for the citizens of Gaza?
Is lobbing missiles at Israel (but not Egypt for some reason) good or bad for the citizens of Gaza?
Is Hamas paying families of suicide bombers good or bad for the citizens of Gaza?
Etc, etc, etc.
SirDippinDots
How long do you want to ignore this user?
canadiaggie said:

SirDippinDots said:

Serotonin said:

Looks like Israel just annihilated a Christian hospital.

Reports of at least 500 people killed in the attack on Al-Ahli Arabi Baptist hospital.


Wrong rocket that was launched by peaceful Hamas that failed. And even if it was an accidental Israeli strike this is on hamas.


When you have to go to Telegram to try and deny an Israeli airstrike against a hospital and throw in the accidental strike qualifier, I think it's time to just admit you want genocide.

I don't know why you go to such great lengths to disguise and deny it. Just admit it. No one will think any less of you if you do. You're already at rock bottom.


Maybe you will be happy with the big guy telling Islamic jihad (I think it was actually them and not Hamas) they need to learn to shoot straight.



Edit: so are you going to continue with your lies of an Israeli air strike against a hospital? My guess is you don't care about the truth. Just name call and run away.
ramblin_ag02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

If those are the only three options (they aren't), we can remove Genocide/ethnic cleansing and peaceful coexistence from the list and so you are advocating for continual warfare.
Quote:

The problem is peaceful coexistence requires compromise on positions neither side is willing to bend. Palestinians will never accept the loss of their perceived right of return; Israel will never give it. Israel will never accept anything that could result in a significant demographic or power shift in Israel. It is an explicitly Jewish state. The core of the conflict remains that the zionist movement settled in a land that was already inhabited. The Palestinians are a conquered people. Israel isn't going to undo that. Vae victus - but we don't have point to that and say it's good.
I don't accept either of these as inevitable or immutable. History is littered with contentious blood feuds and wars lasting generations that just aren't a big deal anymore. Just look at France and Britain. They fought all the wars, even one lasting 100 years, and now it's a big shrug. Yesterday's enemies are tomorrow's allies and vice versa. I also don't see any other option than those three: ethnic cleansing, perpetual warfare, and peaceful coexistence. Looking at it from Israel's view, they don't want mass genocide and they don't want continual warfare. So they should be taking actions toward a goal of peaceful coexistence. As Zobel noted, this is impossible with Israel being an explicitly Zionist state. So it becomes a question of what's more important? Is the existence of a Zionist state in the Holy Land worth hundreds of Jewish deaths per year and the oppression of millions of native Arabs?

I'm not going to engage you on the Hamas as the true oppressor question anymore. I made my view clear. Yes Hamas is terrible and making things worse, as I've said many times. But take away Hamas and the living conditions in Gaza are only slightly less awful. The conditions were awful for decades before Hamas even existed, and that's the exact reason Hamas was formed. Blaming Hamas for the bad conditions of Gaza doesn't make any sense when the conditions predated Hamas by decades.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
AGC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ramblin_ag02 said:

Quote:

If those are the only three options (they aren't), we can remove Genocide/ethnic cleansing and peaceful coexistence from the list and so you are advocating for continual warfare.
Quote:

The problem is peaceful coexistence requires compromise on positions neither side is willing to bend. Palestinians will never accept the loss of their perceived right of return; Israel will never give it. Israel will never accept anything that could result in a significant demographic or power shift in Israel. It is an explicitly Jewish state. The core of the conflict remains that the zionist movement settled in a land that was already inhabited. The Palestinians are a conquered people. Israel isn't going to undo that. Vae victus - but we don't have point to that and say it's good.
I don't accept either of these as inevitable or immutable. History is littered with contentious blood feuds and wars lasting generations that just aren't a big deal anymore. Just look at France and Britain. They fought all the wars, even one lasting 100 years, and now it's a big shrug. Yesterday's enemies are tomorrow's allies and vice versa. I also don't see any other option than those three: ethnic cleansing, perpetual warfare, and peaceful coexistence. Looking at it from Israel's view, they don't want mass genocide and they don't want continual warfare. So they should be taking actions toward a goal of peaceful coexistence. As Zobel noted, this is impossible with Israel being an explicitly Zionist state. So it becomes a question of what's more important? Is the existence of a Zionist state in the Holy Land worth hundreds of Jewish deaths per year and the oppression of millions of native Arabs?

I'm not going to engage you on the Hamas as the true oppressor question anymore. I made my view clear. Yes Hamas is terrible and making things worse, as I've said many times. But take away Hamas and the living conditions in Gaza are only slightly less awful. The conditions were awful for decades before Hamas even existed, and that's the exact reason Hamas was formed. Blaming Hamas for the bad conditions of Gaza doesn't make any sense when the conditions predated Hamas by decades.


I know you try to be even handed but you've exempted Palestinians from their rightful responsibility for those conditions. A brief example would be, ambulances used to run freely between Israel and Gaza. When Palestinians realized this, they used them to transport bombs to kill children and other non-military targets. Thus Israel ended that accommodation and submits them to scrutiny like everything else or doesn't allow them. That type of dynamic has let to a lot of security controls put in place by Israel.

Edit: and that's an old example, not a new one, that also predates this conflict by decades.
ramblin_ag02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not making a special effort to be even-handed. One on hand, both the sides in this conflict are very relatable from their own perspective. On the other, both are very horrible from the other perspective. America being America, I happen to have connections with both Jewish Americans and Palestinian Americans with the closer and more recent connections being to the Palestinian Americans.

I also think that the people with more power in a bad situation deserve more blame and have more responsibility. Israel undeniably has more power in this situation, and therefore I put more responsibility on them.
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
AGC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ramblin_ag02 said:

I'm not making a special effort to be even-handed. One on hand, both the sides in this conflict are very relatable from their own perspective. On the other, both are very horrible from the other perspective. America being America, I happen to have connections with both Jewish Americans and Palestinian Americans with the closer and more recent connections being to the Palestinian Americans.

I also think that the people with more power in a bad situation deserve more blame and have more responsibility. Israel undeniably has more power in this situation, and therefore I put more responsibility on them.


Your view of history is misinformed. They've been punished for relinquishing that power frequently. It'd be one thing to say they never tried but that's simply not the case. Power dynamic cannot be a short handed substitute here and is too simplistic when the freedoms allowed were exploited to murder the Israeli populace. As you said earlier it goes back decades.
ramblin_ag02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Your view of history is misinformed. They've been punished for relinquishing that power frequently. It'd be one thing to say they never tried but that's simply not the case. Power dynamic cannot be a short handed substitute here and is too simplistic when the freedoms allowed were exploited to murder the Israeli populace. As you said earlier it goes back decades.
So inform me. Everything I've run across on the subject shows a bunch of backwater Arabs in the Holy Land being slowly then quickly supplanted and displaced over the course of about 50 years. With more Arabs being forced into less land and worse living conditions in a slow, steady slide. To my knowledge, legal status, citizenship and the right to own property has never been offered to the Palestinians. The only time, of which I'm aware, that Israel gave up power was when they allowed the West Bank and Gaza strip to elect their own governments instead of being 100% a military occupation. They did that because the military occupation was failing horribly. I don't see that things got better or worse for Israel after making that decision.

So what other time did Israel cede power to the Palestinians individually or en masse and suffer for it?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
AGC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ramblin_ag02 said:

Quote:

Your view of history is misinformed. They've been punished for relinquishing that power frequently. It'd be one thing to say they never tried but that's simply not the case. Power dynamic cannot be a short handed substitute here and is too simplistic when the freedoms allowed were exploited to murder the Israeli populace. As you said earlier it goes back decades.
So inform me. Everything I've run across on the subject shows a bunch of backwater Arabs in the Holy Land being slowly then quickly supplanted and displaced over the course of about 50 years. With more Arabs being forced into less land and worse living conditions in a slow, steady slide. To my knowledge, legal status, citizenship and the right to own property has never been offered to the Palestinians. The only time, of which I'm aware, that Israel gave up power was when they allowed the West Bank and Gaza strip to elect their own governments instead of being 100% a military occupation. They did that because the military occupation was failing horribly. I don't see that things got better or worse for Israel after making that decision.

So what other time did Israel cede power to the Palestinians individually or en masse and suffer for it?


Trust in small things leads to trust in big things. Free movement utilized appropriately, electric power utilized appropriately, etc. would all lead to what you want. Instead it's been used to murder and maim (again, you have to go back decades). We're now so far down the road from the bloody small steps that would have led to what you want, that it's forgotten what it used to be like. Modern day academics our age are ignorant of that time. This is my only point - power is not an appropriate shorthand because it actively denies relevant history.
Serotonin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

As many as 800 Christians could be sheltered in the two churches, along with other area residents, Daniel said, but exact numbers are not available.

The Greek Orthodox church borders the Anglican compound that includes the Al Ahli Arab Hospital, Daniel said, but is not directly adjacent to the hospital itself. The church was physically shaken and was hit with dust, and those sheltered there could see smoke from the explosion, Daniel's sources said.
Christians found it safer to shelter at the church than to travel south as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu advised in announcing an imminent ground offensive, Daniel said, because of the safety concerns germane to the Christian community.

"Initially, churches were much safer than [other] buildings," Daniel said.

Even in more peaceful times, Christians there must be careful in choosing residences to avoid potential Hamas neighbors. Whenever violence escalates, churches would be the least likely targets of Israeli fire, as they are not affiliated with Hamas. Additionally, churches hold reserves of food and water, allowing those sheltered there to survive.
https://www.brnow.org/news/little-confidence-of-safety-for-christians-sheltered-in-gaza-churches/

Rumors currently swirling that St Porphyrios Church (where many Christians are sheltering) has been hit.

Unclear whether IDF or Hamas.

Quote:

"For Palestinian Christians in general, but really Gazans, they're being squeezed between two hammers politically and socially in their everyday reality," Daniel said.

"Really only a miracle of God, our prayers and a quick de-escalation, some kind of peace agreement," Daniel said, "are really the only things I think would be constructive in helping this very small and already beleaguered Christian community in Gaza. They really need our prayers."
NowhereMan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I am so tired of people blowing up lives then yelling peace.
Serotonin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TrailerTrash said:

I am so tired of people blowing up lives then yelling peace.
Just to be clear, the guy calling for peace here works for International Christian Concern, an organization working to fight persecution of Christians.

Are you in favor of killing and persecuting Christians?

Assuming you are not, then you are on this guy's side.
AgLiving06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ramblin_ag02 said:

Quote:

If those are the only three options (they aren't), we can remove Genocide/ethnic cleansing and peaceful coexistence from the list and so you are advocating for continual warfare.
Quote:

The problem is peaceful coexistence requires compromise on positions neither side is willing to bend. Palestinians will never accept the loss of their perceived right of return; Israel will never give it. Israel will never accept anything that could result in a significant demographic or power shift in Israel. It is an explicitly Jewish state. The core of the conflict remains that the zionist movement settled in a land that was already inhabited. The Palestinians are a conquered people. Israel isn't going to undo that. Vae victus - but we don't have point to that and say it's good.
I don't accept either of these as inevitable or immutable. History is littered with contentious blood feuds and wars lasting generations that just aren't a big deal anymore. Just look at France and Britain. They fought all the wars, even one lasting 100 years, and now it's a big shrug. Yesterday's enemies are tomorrow's allies and vice versa. I also don't see any other option than those three: ethnic cleansing, perpetual warfare, and peaceful coexistence. Looking at it from Israel's view, they don't want mass genocide and they don't want continual warfare. So they should be taking actions toward a goal of peaceful coexistence. As Zobel noted, this is impossible with Israel being an explicitly Zionist state. So it becomes a question of what's more important? Is the existence of a Zionist state in the Holy Land worth hundreds of Jewish deaths per year and the oppression of millions of native Arabs?

I'm not going to engage you on the Hamas as the true oppressor question anymore. I made my view clear. Yes Hamas is terrible and making things worse, as I've said many times. But take away Hamas and the living conditions in Gaza are only slightly less awful. The conditions were awful for decades before Hamas even existed, and that's the exact reason Hamas was formed. Blaming Hamas for the bad conditions of Gaza doesn't make any sense when the conditions predated Hamas by decades.

You don't have to engage anyone, but you don't also get to make feel good platitudes that you can't and won't defend. The cry of Hamas and Palestine is "From the river to sea, Palestine will be free." Do you know what is in between the river and the sea? Israel. You claim peace is achievable, and it might be...but not with a terrorist organization that not even other Muslims want to deal with.

You accuse us of not offering an alternative, but your option seems to just double on giving terrorists power and money. You want to act as if the last 16 years don't exist. You want CRT applied to this and it's just not going to work.
BonfireNerd04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

You don't have to engage anyone, but you don't also get to make feel good platitudes that you can't and won't defend. The cry of Hamas and Palestine is "From the river to sea, Palestine will be free." Do you know what is in between the river and the sea? Israel. You claim peace is achievable, and it might be...but not with a terrorist organization that not even other Muslims want to deal with.

You accuse us of not offering an alternative, but your option seems to just double on giving terrorists power and money. You want to act as if the last 16 years don't exist. You want CRT applied to this and it's just not going to work.
This.

Some people seem to be under the mistaken impression that the PLO was formed in response to the 1967 war or the subsequent Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands.

It wasn't. It was founded in 1964. When there were no Jewish settlements in the Gaza Strip or the West Bank. Because that land was controlled by Egypt and Jordan, who wouldn't allow any Jews to set foot there.

Palestinians commemorate Israel's Independence Day (May 15, 1948) as their day of national disaster ("nakba"). They object to the very fact that Israel exists.
Zobel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
History didn't start in 1964 or 1948 either.

There are no innocent sides here. There are innocent people on both sides.
swimmerbabe11
How long do you want to ignore this user?

It's baffling to me how difficult this seems to be for so many people
AgLiving06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The problem becomes how far back do you go? Because no matter where you cut the line, it's going to be arbitrary.

Bring it closer to home. 1863 and the freeing of the slaves is essentially the same length of time to 1948 as from 1948 to 2023. Jim Crow laws existed in 1965. So given this, should we be paying reparations to african americans? Should affirmative action continue to allow discrimination against other races to make up for abused well over half a century ago? Abuses that most of this country did not participate in?

When you want to constantly say, "well time didn't start in 1964 or 1948 or 1863 or whenever," you essentially excuse away any and all behavior.

So has Israel done wrong? Sure, everybody can admit that.

Is Israel the oppressor of the Gaza? The answer is still no. That resides with Hamas.

Lets imagine that for the last 16 years, Hamas didn't use the water infrastructure to build missiles, and instead used it for actual water.

Lets imagine that instead of building 300+ miles of underground tunnels, that money went to the citizens?

Lets imagine Hamas actually wanted peace with Israel?

Lets imagine that peace led to more than the current 20k Gaza citizens who work in Israel (who all probably just lost their jobs due to Hamas).

At some point, we have to stop searching history to figure out just who oppressed who and start moving forward.
SirDippinDots
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zobel said:

History didn't start in 1964 or 1948 either.

There are no innocent sides here. There are innocent people on both sides.


Stop hating the Jews and always making excuses.
Hamas was elected by the Palestinians. They made their bed so now they can lay in it.
Aggrad08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And what role did Israel play in the creation of Hamas? It's their bed too if you know your history
HarleySpoon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Here is my proposed solution: Acknowledging of course that recorded history goes back 4,000 years in the region and that societies have come, gone, been conquered, conquered, returned, eliminated etc. But alas, here we are. How about if we take the what the British considered/called/referred to/ ruled in 1946 as Palestine and give the Arabs in that area 80% and give the Jews in the area 20%? Now you guys recognize each others' right to exist and go live in peace.
ramblin_ag02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

You accuse us of not offering an alternative, but your option seems to just double on giving terrorists power and money. You want to act as if the last 16 years don't exist. You want CRT applied to this and it's just not going to work.
Gotta love the internet. I'm only suggesting that the Palestinians are human beings with inalienable rights such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and that the state of Israel has impinged on those rights for its entire existence. Apparently that makes me an advocate for critical race theory? And also my solution to the problem is granting Palestinians legal status and the ability to work and travel means that I just want to throw more aid money at them?
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
SirDippinDots
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggrad08 said:

And what role did Israel play in the creation of Hamas? It's their bed too if you know your history


You're right. If those stubborn Jews would have just died this would not be necessary.
Frok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HarleySpoon said:

Here is my proposed solution: Acknowledging of course that recorded history goes back 4,000 years in the region and that societies have come, gone, been conquered, conquered, returned, eliminated etc. But alas, here we are. How about if we take the what the British considered/called/referred to/ ruled in 1946 as Palestine and give the Arabs in that area 80% and give the Jews in the area 20%? Now you guys recognize each others' right to exist and go live in peace.


That's like saying, hey Longhorns, we'll give you the Big 12 and Aggies we will give you the SEC, now go live in peace.

Sure enough the ol' sippers will come storming over wanting to take our SEC.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.