Here's the great philosopher Ali G on the subject
dargscisyhp said:
Homie, trust me, I find some of your views just as vile.
I'll go ahead and start with the notion that we should force teenage rape victims to carry their babies to term and provide for it with zero government assistance, on minimum wage, all while being forced to deal with the trauma from it.Joe Boudain said:dargscisyhp said:
Homie, trust me, I find some of your views just as vile.
Which ones? As vile as killing babies?
With all due respect that is less than 1% of abortions.larry culpepper said:I'll go ahead and start with the notion that we should force teenage rape victims to carry their babies to term and provide for it with zero government assistance, on minimum wage, all while being forced to deal with the trauma from it.Joe Boudain said:dargscisyhp said:
Homie, trust me, I find some of your views just as vile.
Which ones? As vile as killing babies?
A single mom on minimum wage does not have zero government assistance. Not to mention all the non-profit assistance and adoption agencies.larry culpepper said:I'll go ahead and start with the notion that we should force teenage rape victims to carry their babies to term and provide for it with zero government assistance, on minimum wage, all while being forced to deal with the trauma from it.Joe Boudain said:dargscisyhp said:
Homie, trust me, I find some of your views just as vile.
Which ones? As vile as killing babies?
and they are wholly relevant now. We can talk about the most extreme of circumstances because they are made illegal by this new law.dermdoc said:With all due respect that is less than 1% of abortions.larry culpepper said:I'll go ahead and start with the notion that we should force teenage rape victims to carry their babies to term and provide for it with zero government assistance, on minimum wage, all while being forced to deal with the trauma from it.Joe Boudain said:dargscisyhp said:
Homie, trust me, I find some of your views just as vile.
Which ones? As vile as killing babies?
larry culpepper said:and they are wholly relevant now. We can talk about the most extreme of circumstances because they are made illegal by this new law.dermdoc said:With all due respect that is less than 1% of abortions.larry culpepper said:I'll go ahead and start with the notion that we should force teenage rape victims to carry their babies to term and provide for it with zero government assistance, on minimum wage, all while being forced to deal with the trauma from it.Joe Boudain said:dargscisyhp said:
Homie, trust me, I find some of your views just as vile.
Which ones? As vile as killing babies?
How does it help a teenage rape victim mentally to then add to their trauma the guilt of murder? Evil added to evil doesn't lead to less evil.larry culpepper said:I'll go ahead and start with the notion that we should force teenage rape victims to carry their babies to term and provide for it with zero government assistance, on minimum wage, all while being forced to deal with the trauma from it.Joe Boudain said:dargscisyhp said:
Homie, trust me, I find some of your views just as vile.
Which ones? As vile as killing babies?
Are you a woman? Have you been raped? Have you been pregnant?jrico2727 said:How does it help a teenage rape victim mentally to then add to their trauma the guilt of murder? Evil added to evil doesn't lead to less evil.larry culpepper said:I'll go ahead and start with the notion that we should force teenage rape victims to carry their babies to term and provide for it with zero government assistance, on minimum wage, all while being forced to deal with the trauma from it.Joe Boudain said:dargscisyhp said:
Homie, trust me, I find some of your views just as vile.
Which ones? As vile as killing babies?
Because of how extreme the new law is, yes it absolutely is about these extreme circumstances. Rape, incest, fetal deformities where the mother knows the baby wont survive outside the womb. Extreme situations that no one ever wants to be put in, that cause a world of pain for the mother. This is why I believe abortion should be legal. And it's why I think laws that completely disregard these situations and add to the pain, are evil.dermdoc said:
Again with all due respect, they can still get an bottom until the heartbeat which I believe is six months, correct?
However horrid rape is, that is not what this is about.
This is about limiting abortion for convenience which is the vast majority of abortions. And consensual sex not rape.
Really man. Bad bull.larry culpepper said:Because of how extreme the new law is, yes it absolutely is about these extreme circumstances. Rape, incest, fetal deformities where the mother knows the baby wont survive outside the womb. Extreme situations that no one ever wants to be put in, that cause a world of pain for the mother. This is why I believe abortion should be legal. And it's why I think laws that completely disregard these situations and add to the pain, are evil.dermdoc said:
Again with all due respect, they can still get an bottom until the heartbeat which I believe is six months, correct?
However horrid rape is, that is not what this is about.
This is about limiting abortion for convenience which is the vast majority of abortions. And consensual sex not rape.
Yes I am aware people get abortions for convenience. If you don't like that, fine. I don't like it either. But I have read up enough on this to know that making them self-administer illegal abortions isn't the answer either. I have always advocated for solutions that actually lower unplanned pregnancies and therefore abortions, such as comprehensive education and wider access to contraceptives that have PROVEN to work in other states and countries that have taken that approach.
But for some reason we keep harping on making abortion illegal, which when it all boils down to it just makes it illegal for low income women. Rich Republican men will always find a way to get their girlfriends, wives, and mistresses an abortion.
Yes this is the dividing point and is why the abortion debate will never find middle ground.dermdoc said:
Question
If one thinks abortion is murder aren't they morally obligated to be against it completely? Are some murders "okay"?
And this is the dividing point, is it murder or is it not? I think it is.
Aren't all laws due to legislature imposing the views of the people who elect them? Why is this different? If the voters of Texas disagree, they will vote them out and new laws will be made. That is how this works.larry culpepper said:Yes this is the dividing point and is why the abortion debate will never find middle ground.dermdoc said:
Question
If one thinks abortion is murder aren't they morally obligated to be against it completely? Are some murders "okay"?
And this is the dividing point, is it murder or is it not? I think it is.
Yes they will be against it, and that's their right. Where I take issue is when they impose that view on the state or country.
No, I do not believe abortion in the first trimester is murder. I also don't like the idea of terminating a pregnancy. But I acknowledge that people's situations are different from mine and it's none of the government's business to stick their nose into this. Especially when it's rich male politicians who have no ****ing clue what the women are going through (which almost always seems to be the case).
except for the gaming of the system with gerrymandering.dermdoc said:Aren't all laws due to legislature imposing the views of the people who elect them? Why is this different? If the voters of Texas disagree, they will vote them out and new laws will be made. That is how this works.larry culpepper said:Yes this is the dividing point and is why the abortion debate will never find middle ground.dermdoc said:
Question
If one thinks abortion is murder aren't they morally obligated to be against it completely? Are some murders "okay"?
And this is the dividing point, is it murder or is it not? I think it is.
Yes they will be against it, and that's their right. Where I take issue is when they impose that view on the state or country.
No, I do not believe abortion in the first trimester is murder. I also don't like the idea of terminating a pregnancy. But I acknowledge that people's situations are different from mine and it's none of the government's business to stick their nose into this. Especially when it's rich male politicians who have no ****ing clue what the women are going through (which almost always seems to be the case).
Why?schmendeler said:
i would hope regardless of your stance on abortion, you can admit that this texas law is a cluster**** waiting to happen. it's wild to me that the supreme court is letting it stand for now.
contracting out the enforcement of laws to vigilantes seems like a problem to me.dermdoc said:Why?schmendeler said:
i would hope regardless of your stance on abortion, you can admit that this texas law is a cluster**** waiting to happen. it's wild to me that the supreme court is letting it stand for now.
A little hyperbole? Maybe?schmendeler said:contracting out the enforcement of laws to vigilantes seems like a problem to me.dermdoc said:Why?schmendeler said:
i would hope regardless of your stance on abortion, you can admit that this texas law is a cluster**** waiting to happen. it's wild to me that the supreme court is letting it stand for now.
I don't feel bad about pulling the rich Republican card because it's true. I'm not saying you are included in that group, but if their woman needs an abortion they'll get it for them as they always have. This affects low and middle income women. And I'm picking on Republicans because they vote for and pass these types of laws.dermdoc said:Really man. Bad bull.larry culpepper said:Because of how extreme the new law is, yes it absolutely is about these extreme circumstances. Rape, incest, fetal deformities where the mother knows the baby wont survive outside the womb. Extreme situations that no one ever wants to be put in, that cause a world of pain for the mother. This is why I believe abortion should be legal. And it's why I think laws that completely disregard these situations and add to the pain, are evil.dermdoc said:
Again with all due respect, they can still get an bottom until the heartbeat which I believe is six months, correct?
However horrid rape is, that is not what this is about.
This is about limiting abortion for convenience which is the vast majority of abortions. And consensual sex not rape.
Yes I am aware people get abortions for convenience. If you don't like that, fine. I don't like it either. But I have read up enough on this to know that making them self-administer illegal abortions isn't the answer either. I have always advocated for solutions that actually lower unplanned pregnancies and therefore abortions, such as comprehensive education and wider access to contraceptives that have PROVEN to work in other states and countries that have taken that approach.
But for some reason we keep harping on making abortion illegal, which when it all boils down to it just makes it illegal for low income women. Rich Republican men will always find a way to get their girlfriends, wives, and mistresses an abortion.
There are so many straw men in your post it is difficult to discuss. We have rape victims and congenital problems which are a minuscule part of the abortion equation as you know.
Then the "rich, Republican card? C'mon man. No need for stooping to this kind of caricature.
It all comes down to whether you believe abortion is murder as I do. If you do not think it is murder then everything becomes relative.
Couldnt agree more. It's not even about the 6 week ban. It's more so the BSC provision that deputizes private citizens to sue anyone they suspect of having an abortion or aiding and abetting an abortion. They can sue the damn Uber driver who takes the woman to the clinic. And automatic $10k plus attorney's fees if they win?schmendeler said:
i would hope regardless of your stance on abortion, you can admit that this texas law is a cluster**** waiting to happen. it's wild to me that the supreme court is letting it stand for now.