c-jags said:
TCTTS said:
Prometheus and Covenant certainly have their strengths, but they're both far more interested in David's story (the android played by Michael Fassbender) than being tried-and-true "haunted house" Alien movies.
I'm curious to give 3 a chance again, since it's from David Fincher (one of my favorite directors/it was his first movie), and I'm also seeing more and more people saying "Actually, it's pretty good" as of late, with everyone doing rewatches in the lead up to Romulus.
i've seen a lot of people defending it as well and that's foreign to me because it's awful from my memory.
agreed with loving Fincher, but from my understanding, he was handed a pile of poop.
Alien 3 isn't that bad IMO, but when you have to follow Alien and Aliens it's an uphill battle. Charles S. Dutton and Charles Dance were good in their roles. The setting of a prison planet I thought was a good change as well. I saw it when I was a kid, not knowing anything about David Fincher. Watching it now as a David Fincher fan you can see a lot of him in there visually and appreciate that.
That being said, there's significant issues with the plot, but that is more likely on the writers and studio than Fincher. Newt and Hicks were just DOA when they landed. Ripley was impregnated by a face hugger at some unknown point in time. But Bishop who was torn apart somehow is aware that on the same pod that crashed there's a face hugger, and the company knows as well. Even though early in his career that seems way too sloppy for Fincher to have been on board with. Fincher doesn't even claim this movie because it didn't become what he believed he was going to be able to make, it got turned into something else.