I'd ask that you share this as widely as possible. There are those without an iota of training, education, or experience who want you to cherry pick this topic with ignorance and malice. Don't take the bait. This isn't going away, the dam is cracking.#ufotwitter https://t.co/lmiHQnO6Gs

— Sean Cahill (@mintyhyperspace) July 27, 2023

Been doing some more digging on the research that was introduced into record regarding spacetime propulsion. I think that was the biggest clue given in regards to UAP's. Why introduce it and then not say a word about it? What has been physically seen corresponds pretty damn closely to what is proposed in these unclassified documents. Couple of snippets:

Future aerospace vehicles could have an advanced propulsion system that uses negative quantum vacuum energy to modify the spacetime geometry in the immediate vicinity surrounding the vehicle in order to induce faster-than-light motion via traversable wormholes or warp drives, or even levitation via antigravity

https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/dia/AAWSAP-DIRDs/DIRD_36-DIRD_Quantum_Tomography_of_Negative_Energy_States_in_the_Vacuum.pdf


Antigravity via Quantum Vacuum Zero-Point Fluctuation Force: Calloni et al.'s experimental proposal reviewed in Section IV-A should be funded and performed by a high quality laboratory.

https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/dia/AAWSAP-DIRDs/DIRD_19-DIRD_Antigravity_for_Aerospace_Applications.pdf

One believes that an energy field called the Higgs boson permeates spacetime and that the interaction of matter with this field is what is responsible for particles acquiring mass. One believes that an exotic ubiquitous energy source, unimaginatively named dark energy, is responsible for the current accelerated expansion of the universe based on observation of supernova in galaxies billions of light years from Earth. One also believes that the universe may not consist of the three spatial dimension of length, breadth, width, and one of time, but that, in fact, there may be as many as seven additional compactified dimensions assuming the topology of a Calabi-Yau manifold, and that the fundamental building blocks of the universe are] in fact, extended string-like entities.

https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/dia/AAWSAP-DIRDs/DIRD_13-DIRD_Warp_Drive_Dark_energy_and_the_Manipulation_of_Extra_Dimensions.pdf

Malachi Constant said:

---

Back to that Dan Carlin Substack article, here is the best part:

Quote:

---

For me, I have my own pet hope if the big alien reveal happens in my lifetime. If extraterrestrial life is real, and if it has indeed been visiting our planet for a very long time, they likely are going to know more about our history than we do. They might have the equivalent of photos, or hi-definition videos of major planetary events. Their "History of the Earth" files would answer questions about our past that we didn't even know to ask. They might even have the capabilities that would allow us to travel back and see the long-gone people and events from centuries or millennia ago. Of course this sounds like the most ridiculous, crazy science fiction fantasy imaginable. Which is why it might blow our minds if in the near future it wasn't science fiction anymore.

---

https://dancarlin.substack.com/p/can-we-handle-the-truth?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

---

Just don't let a doped up Dr. McCoy anywhere near it, or we could all be speaking German.

I read (skimmed, more accurately, because, as I mentioned above, I'm not a physicist) the last paper because the title looked the most interesting. I'm sorry, but this comes across to me like word salad. There are too many "of course" and "obviously" qualifiers throughout, as if the author doesn't really understand the math and is just trying to BS their way through any objections to get funding. Would appreciate a sufficiently expert mathematician's take on what looks like gobbledygook.

Love this. I don't know about the time travel travel part, but if these entities really have been around for thousands of years, you know they'll absolutely have tons of video or holograms or whatever of our history. To be able to see actual footage of Romans or the Middle Ages or the Civil War or whoever would be mind blowing. Heck, if they're inter-dimensional, they could have ways of "recording" our reality that we can't even conceive of yet.

Seeing the Alamo, Thermopylae, Hannibal marching with Elephants…

This cannot be repeated enough…

Quote:

---

The witnesses weren't going to deliver conclusive proof of ET. They don't have it. Only Grusch claims to have seen classified proof of secret programs that harbor ET evidence.

You're not supposed to be convinced without a shadow of doubt ETs exist. They are simply making a plea to Congress to investigate further.

Believe as you will where this will lead.

---

The entitlement from some people in this regard is so over the top. I've said it before and I'll say it again, but Grusch and the like owe us nothing. They're not here to convince the masses and show us proof. They're here to convince the powers-that-be to investigate further, and the hope is that *they'll* be the ones to eventually show us proof. If not, I imagine more extreme measures will then be taken, in the form of leaks. Either way, we have to let this process play out.

The witnesses weren't going to deliver conclusive proof of ET. They don't have it. Only Grusch claims to have seen classified proof of secret programs that harbor ET evidence.

You're not supposed to be convinced without a shadow of doubt ETs exist. They are simply making a… https://t.co/2L6zZ4Ntmy

— UFO Study 🛸 (@UfoStudy) July 27, 2023

That's a very weird response to what Brian Cox said.

That's not what I was concentrating on. More a response to die hard naysayers and certain people in this thread.

I didn't watch the hearings, because I have a job.

But I'm guessing by the lack of big press, that this it was a nothing burger?

aTmAg said:

---

I didn't watch the hearings, because I have a job.

JFC, are you ever not condescending?

But I'm guessing by the lack of big press, that this it was a nothing burger?

Read the past couple days of posts. News of the hearing and what was said in it are everywhere.

---

As usual, you have no sense of humor.

And Fox/Cnn have basically nothing about it on their front pages.

Seems to me, if there were any bombshells, it would be top of both pages.

Fox and CNN have each had multiple on air reports about the hearings, both yesterday and today. Same as MSNBC, all the broadcast news networks, and the BBC.

It was definitely not bombshells. Grusch saying what he has about non-human biologics, or whatever, is the most "headline" grabbing, but no one is gonna make that breaking news when he had to keep reverting to "it's classified."

TCTTS said:

---

.... To be able to see actual footage of Romans or the Middle Ages or the Civil War or whoever would be mind blowing. Heck, if they're inter-dimensional, they could have ways of "recording" our reality that we can't even conceive of yet.

---

Bummer. My wife was so looking forward to season 11 of 'Curse of Oak Island.'

"A wrap-up of the astonishing Congressional Oversight Committee UAP Hearing, 26th July ,2023. In the words of of one Congressman - "We made history here" I talk with Steve Bassett , Executive Director of the Paradigm Research Group who has campaigned for three decades on this issue - Steve was at the Hearing, in Washington DC. What happens next? We get Steve's overview.."

https://theunexplained.tv/episodes/edition-743-uap-hearing-260723

The battle among multiple factions in the Pentagon has gotten real. Good will win out over evil IMO.

TCTTS said:

---

Fox and CNN have each had multiple on air reports about the hearings, both yesterday and today. Same as MSNBC, all the broadcast news networks, and the BBC.

---

It's one thing to just have reports the hearings of the day. They always do that.

But if the USAF said, we got alien bodies in a freezer, brought pieces of UFO to the hearings, or something big like that then it would be the top story for a month.

Redstone said:

---

First-hand testimony is significant evidence.

Disclosure is a process, not an event.

We are witnessing Disclosure in real time.

---

This thread is pretty damned long. I don't have time to read it all. But did this hearing change any minds? We're there any TexAgs doubters who said, "I was wrong, we have indeed been visited by aliens?"

What was the most compelling evidence provided?

aTmAg said:

---

Redstone said:

---

First-hand testimony is significant evidence.

Disclosure is a process, not an event.

We are witnessing Disclosure in real time.

---

This thread is pretty damned long. I don't have time to read it all. But did this hearing change any minds? We're there any TexAgs doubters who said, "I was wrong, we have indeed been visited by aliens?"

What was the most compelling evidence provided?

---

No one has changed minds after this hearing.

All the evidence in this hearing was testimony, and probably the most compelling, in my opinion, was the pilot who said daily flight briefings and new pilot training included discussion on the frequency and likelihood of encountering UAP.

The description of the tic tac by the other pilot was really incredible, but I personally can't help but wonder how much of it was hyperbole.

A potential #UAP Church Committee-style Congressional investigation into the allegations raised by David Grusch and other witnesses is now being mooted. https://t.co/AsWVG9hVwQ

— Ross Coulthart (@rosscoulthart) July 28, 2023

aTmAg said:

---

Redstone said:

---

First-hand testimony is significant evidence.

Disclosure is a process, not an event.

We are witnessing Disclosure in real time.

---

This thread is pretty damned long. I don't have time to read it all. But did this hearing change any minds? We're there any TexAgs doubters who said, "I was wrong, we have indeed been visited by aliens?"

What was the most compelling evidence provided?

---

Good question. I think the fact that the testimony given was under oath, not something you read at the grocery store check-out line. Evidence of those who have evidence.. what many are hoping for....those that have worked..hands on with craft and or exotic materials. Evidently, the line is getting longer for those to testify. Lying about this would most likely get you prison vacation. This video dives into that...awesome listen:

Amazing time to be alive and potentially see the 80+ year, illegal cover-up of this reality..exposed.

So Grusch confirmed aliens are real I'm hearing

Aztec1948 said:

---

The battle among multiple factions in the Pentagon has gotten real. Good will win out over evil IMO.

---

This content, right here

Did Austin or Milley testify?

Ghost of Bisbee said:

---

So Grusch confirmed aliens are real I'm hearing

---

aTmAg said:

---

I'll have to disagree on the perjury at a committee. People lie at hearings all the time without any sort of punishment.

---

Just repeating what those covering this have stated. Clearly not the main issue hear though.

Ghost of Bisbee said:

---

So Grusch confirmed aliens are real I'm hearing

---

Pretty much and Bob Lazar confirmed it in 1989. Some didn't get the memo though.

Interesting video from a Coast Guard plane off the coast of Puerto Rico showing a UAP. You can very clearly see the bubble of distorted space surrounding whatever it is flying. You can also see it go into the ocean without any type of disturbance or resistance.

Sounds about right

💥💥Huge statement👇

"We tried to get in a scif with David Grusch & we were told NO because he does NOT have a security clearance." - Tim Burchett

So does this mean when his clearance was revoked after meeting with Corbell & Knapp, he didn't get it back? 🤔#ufotwitter pic.twitter.com/ThEZbKHWfn

— 👽Who is Axelrod 👽 (@Go_Kick_Rocks88) July 28, 2023