*** UAP THREAD ***

436,094 Views | 5225 Replies | Last: 21 hrs ago by Eliminatus
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mace asked Grusch directly if the government has made contact with non-human intelligence. Grusch said he could discuss in a closed session.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Grusch said he could discuss in a closed session.


On repeat…
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
redline248 said:

TCTTS said:

IMO, each one of these witnesses have been incredibly impressive. We could not have asked for three better officials to kick these hearings off…


I am not saying one way or the other, but being confident in answers does not automatically = credible.

Many liars are confident in their lies. Again, not saying he is lying.


True, but his credibility in this instance is also based on the clearance and positions he's held, along with the many credible officials who have come forward to vouch for him and corroborate his info.
Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
redline248 said:

TCTTS said:

IMO, each one of these witnesses have been incredibly impressive. We could not have asked for three better officials to kick these hearings off…


I am not saying one way or the other, but being confident in answers does not automatically = credible.

Many liars are confident in their lies. Again, not saying he is lying.
Agreed. Grusch has been impressive. Honestly he seems far better to me here than in his interview. But as I said earlier in this thread with any of the other UFO experts the idea that they "come off as credible" itself doesn't really mean anything, the very best manipulators and criminals and liars are extremely convincing. In the event that he's lying (which I don't think he is) it wouldn't be like catching your teenager trying to sneak out of the house.

I am NOT saying I think that about Grusch, just that it's always best to focus on the presented facts and statements, not on how comfortable someone looks. Unfortunately, the lack of any solid data to study over all these decades has reduced most people to simply trying to determine what and who sounds believable. We've got to get past that.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

Quote:

Grusch said he could discuss in a closed session.


On repeat…
He claims it's classified and he would be prosecuted for revealing the information in an open setting. He's not the only witness. Frankly, Fravor and Graves have been the most interesting witnesses today.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Graves described the object as a "dark gray cube inside a clear sphere". Said that another pilot flew within 50 feet of it.
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
G Martin 87 said:

Graves described the object as a "dark gray cube inside a clear sphere". Said that another pilot flew within 50 feet of it.
The varying descriptions is also pretty fascinating to me. Do we have multiple groups of ETs coming here?
Teddy Perkins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just gotta say, I love Commander Fravor.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
redline248 said:

G Martin 87 said:

Graves described the object as a "dark gray cube inside a clear sphere". Said that another pilot flew within 50 feet of it.
The varying descriptions is also pretty fascinating to me. Do we have multiple groups of ETs coming here?
The variety in size and form of human aircraft is practically unlimited, and we're a single species. Who's to say that each ET/NHI only uses 1 design?
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Teddy Perkins said:

Just gotta say, I love Commander Fravor.
He's been fantastic.
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's it. Very interesting hearing, I would recommend everyone watch later if able. The emphasis was clearly on the national security and public safety consequences of UAP encounters, as well as the claims of reprisals against military and commercial pilots for reporting incidents. We got more details from both Graves and Fravor about the incidents they reported, including that multiple aircraft and ship borne systems tracked the objects. The released Tic Tac and Gimbal videos are not the only footage. Need to see the rest.
Joes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
G Martin 87 said:

redline248 said:

G Martin 87 said:

Graves described the object as a "dark gray cube inside a clear sphere". Said that another pilot flew within 50 feet of it.
The varying descriptions is also pretty fascinating to me. Do we have multiple groups of ETs coming here?
The variety in size and form of human aircraft is practically unlimited, and we're a single species. Who's to say that each ET/NHI only uses 1 design?
True, there's nothing unreasonable about that, but I do think that the wide variety of descriptions hurts some. They're harmless but they're also malevolent, they're short but they're also tall, their craft are drone sized but they're also football field sized, they're cubes within spheres but they're also disc shaped, and triangle shaped, and tic-tac shaped, etc.

It's like Grand Central Station around here apparently, right out of MiB. I can't quite reconcile the conflicting idea that life is common everywhere and we're just some random example of it but at the same time we seem to be absolutely swarmed with interest.

I don't know, it WAS interesting and I'll continue to follow it all, but I'm as confident as ever we'll never have a smoking gun shock-the-world type disclosure moment. I guess we'll see.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great first hearing. Great first step. It definitely pierced the mainstream, as I'm seeing clips, quotes, and excerpts all over my social media feeds, and it will no doubt make all the major news stations as well. If anything, it's so incredibly satisfying to see so many notable names, on both sides of the isle, taking this subject seriously, and asking genuinely thoughtful questions.
Wrec86 Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
G Martin 87 said:

Foxx asking Grusch directly about recovered craft and bodies. She's quoting back AARO's assertion that they have not found any evidence of that. She's pushing for transparency, also citing the Chinese spy balloon incident.


I have a buddy with "3 letter organization" connections that has told me some crazy **** about the Chinese balloon incident.
Rocagnante
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Care to share?
Wrec86 Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rocagnante said:

Care to share?


Maybe in a closed door session /badjoke


No, I'm not gonna take even a tiny chance of him losing his clearance by repeating what he told me on a message board.

I guess the most I'll say is that other than is being too slow to detect what was going on, our government handled it exactly like they needed to…. both behind closed doors, and in public.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Love seeing the fire and determination here. That, and never in a million years could I have imagined a press conference with these kinds of questions being asked and answers being given…

Agristotle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Take it for what its worth, I had to prep my boss for congressional testimony on a hot button topic, we worked furiously to be ready for various lines of questioning and after the first day he told me,

"Relax, they don't really care about the truth or the problem. Most of them are just grandstanding for their constituency/major donors. Any answer of more than 90 seconds frustrates them."
Rocagnante
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wrec86 Ag said:

Rocagnante said:

Care to share?


Maybe in a closed door session /badjoke


No, I'm not gonna take even a tiny chance of him losing his clearance by repeating what he told me on a message board.

I guess the most I'll say is that other than is being too slow to detect what was going on, our government handled it exactly like they needed to…. both behind closed doors, and in public.


Holy ***** Grusch posts on TexAgs!
G Martin 87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Love seeing the fire and determination here. That, and never in a million years could I have imagined a press conference with these kinds of questions being asked and answers being given…


Burchett sounds crazy sometimes. He's dropping a lot of hokey sound bites that are frankly counterproductive. More Luna and Mace, please.
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It really does feel like we're right on the cusp of something huge. If we don't get any goods on this, one way or the other, going to be a massive blue balls session.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agreed.

(Now, prepare for a dozen posts telling you how it's going be blue balls for eternity.)
Agristotle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
you know I appreciate your work on this thread, but I'll admit, I'm of the "blue balls" opinion.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And that's perfectly sane/normal. I don't blame you at all. I'm more calling out the people who feel the need to tell us over and over and over and over again.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aztec1948
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So now that high ranking former military/intelligence official has claimed we have "exotic..not of this planet materials and vehicles".....where do we go from here?

I think 3 very important questions need to be asked and answered. Hopefully honestly.

Who initiated the original lie about Roswell?

Who has been responsible for its maintenance?

Why?

Here is a link to today's congressional hearing:

"I have been told that we have recovered technology that did not originate on this".-Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence-Chris Mellon

“Behind the scenes, high-ranking Air Force officers are soberly concerned about UFOs. But through official secrecy and ridicule, many citizens are led to believe that unknown flying objects are nonsense.” Former CIA Director, Roscoe Hillenkoetter, public statement, 1960.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Redstone
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What is disclosure? Seriously.

Here we are.

Disclosure is primarily a process, and less an event. I've said this since shortly after sign-up (Spring 1999, Blocker computer lab).

Extra-terrestrial entities exist, exactly like I've stated here for 24 years.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TKEAg04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wrec86 Ag said:

Rocagnante said:

Care to share?


Maybe in a closed door session /badjoke


No, I'm not gonna take even a tiny chance of him losing his clearance by repeating what he told me on a message board.

I guess the most I'll say is that other than is being too slow to detect what was going on, our government handled it exactly like they needed to…. both behind closed doors, and in public.
Balloon was not actually there and it was a UAP they couldn't risk taking down over somewhere that a lot of people could take pictures and videos.....When the time came to shoot it down, the balloon was staged?

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rocagnante
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Agreed.

(Now, prepare for a dozen posts telling you how it's going be blue balls for eternity.)


Grusch appears willing to discuss behind closed doors with anyone with sufficient clearance. The more he does then things will begin to leak. Which will hopefully force things with those controlling access to the proof.

I still can't shake this feeling the past 4-5 years is all a big ruse but it's certainly becoming harder to keep my marker there.
First Page Last Page
Page 26 of 150
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.