He didn't technically confirm any murdersG Martin 87 said:
Grusch just said he directed people with knowledge of murders to the appropriate authorities. Can't say more due to his whistleblower case.
He didn't technically confirm any murdersG Martin 87 said:
Grusch just said he directed people with knowledge of murders to the appropriate authorities. Can't say more due to his whistleblower case.
Right, but the question was explicitly about murders.redline248 said:He didn't technically confirm any murdersG Martin 87 said:
Grusch just said he directed people with knowledge of murders to the appropriate authorities. Can't say more due to his whistleblower case.
He's been in one and claims ignorance to everything. Grusch would say that is because the info Grusch has is being withheld from AARO.redline248 said:
The person Luna just mentioned from AERO - I missed the name - they need to get him in a hearing and ask him questions
I admit it's been interesting so far. good questions and the three have all been impressive. But what you just said is interesting because secondhand witness Grusch keeps emphasizing he's being terrorized and fears for his life but then they asked firsthand witness Fravor about how he's been treated and he smiled broadly and said twice he's been treated very well. Just a little odd.G Martin 87 said:
Most of the questions are being directed at Graves and Fravor to explain further what they witnessed and what the national security implications are. Smart strategy, I think. Grusch's claims are not first hand. Theirs are.
I would say a pilot talking about what he sees is "less threatening" than a guy who knows specifically who and where everything is.Joes said:I admit it's been interesting so far. good questions and the three have all been impressive. But what you just said is interesting because secondhand witness Grusch keeps emphasizing he's being terrorized and fears for his life but then they asked firsthand witness Fravor about how he's been treated and he smiled broadly and said twice he's been treated very well. Just a little odd.G Martin 87 said:
Most of the questions are being directed at Graves and Fravor to explain further what they witnessed and what the national security implications are. Smart strategy, I think. Grusch's claims are not first hand. Theirs are.
Exactly. That point is being illustrated.redline248 said:I would say a pilot talking about what he sees is "less threatening" than a guy who knows specifically who and where everything is.Joes said:I admit it's been interesting so far. good questions and the three have all been impressive. But what you just said is interesting because secondhand witness Grusch keeps emphasizing he's being terrorized and fears for his life but then they asked firsthand witness Fravor about how he's been treated and he smiled broadly and said twice he's been treated very well. Just a little odd.G Martin 87 said:
Most of the questions are being directed at Graves and Fravor to explain further what they witnessed and what the national security implications are. Smart strategy, I think. Grusch's claims are not first hand. Theirs are.
Agreedredline248 said:
She's just soap boxing
G Martin 87 said:Agreedredline248 said:
She's just soap boxing
Yeah, I get that, I was just noting the contrast.redline248 said:I would say a pilot talking about what he sees is "less threatening" than a guy who knows specifically who and where everything is.Joes said:I admit it's been interesting so far. good questions and the three have all been impressive. But what you just said is interesting because secondhand witness Grusch keeps emphasizing he's being terrorized and fears for his life but then they asked firsthand witness Fravor about how he's been treated and he smiled broadly and said twice he's been treated very well. Just a little odd.G Martin 87 said:
Most of the questions are being directed at Graves and Fravor to explain further what they witnessed and what the national security implications are. Smart strategy, I think. Grusch's claims are not first hand. Theirs are.
please keep providing the updates. I can't watch.TCTTS said:
G Martin - just FYI, I'm now able to watch the hearing on my phone, so if you're providing updates primarily for me, no need anymore. If not, though, keep at it. Thanks again either way.
Grusch and Burchett are getting it on the record that special access above what they have is not necessary, so why can't they have oversight? That's important, even if Grusch can't say anything beyond "I can't get into that in an open setting."redline248 said:
All the "good" info being behind disclosure protections is annoying AF
Agreed. By far the most "to the point" to nail things down unambiguously. Plus some more bonus dadgummits!Noblemen06 said:
Burchett's questioning is pretty fantastic
Deep StateHouston Lee said:
A group of people in government and out of government sit and decide who can and can't have access to this UAP info.
Shadow government. Or better know and the "Industrial Military Complex"
David Grusch is insanely credible.
— ᴋʟᴀᵾs (@tinyklaus) July 26, 2023
Super comfortable and confident in his answers.
I'm beyond impressed.
I am not saying one way or the other, but being confident in answers does not automatically = credible.TCTTS said:
IMO, each one of these witnesses have been incredibly impressive. We could not have asked for three better officials to kick these hearings off…David Grusch is insanely credible.
— ᴋʟᴀᵾs (@tinyklaus) July 26, 2023
Super comfortable and confident in his answers.
I'm beyond impressed.