*** The Batman (spoiler thread) ***

63,391 Views | 864 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by TCTTS
FL_Ag1998
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brian Earl Spilner said:

I've loved Giacchino ever since he scored LOST, but he's quickly reaching Zimmer / Shore territory.


I listen to his Lost score all the time and was excited when I saw he was doing this one.
20ag07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

But isn't that the whole point? He's let the Batman persona take over his entire life. He hasn't learned how to balance his life between Bruce and Batman yet.

This was very much the intent of his first scene with Alfred.
Sure, Reeves can make whatever points he wants. And we can agree or disagree with them.

Personally, I disagree with that choice. As being the character of "Bruce Wayne" is something the Batman always had to deal with.
BoydCrowder13
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FL_Ag1998 said:

Brian Earl Spilner said:

I've loved Giacchino ever since he scored LOST, but he's quickly reaching Zimmer / Shore territory.


I listen to his Lost score all the time and was excited when I saw he was doing this one.


May be heresy but I like Giacchino better than Zimmer.

He has helmed some incredible scores in the last 20 years.

Incredible
Mission Impossible
Star Trek
Up
Lost
Jurassic World
Coco
Inside Out
Dawn of the Planet of the Apes
Spider-Man
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I see your point, but I suppose he needed to differentiate this from the Nolan films somehow. Personally I dug it and it made me all the more interested in seeing him evolve into that playboy persona.
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That was fantastic. I initially thought I might like it better than any of Nolan's DK movies, but am perhaps coming down off that fantastic high I was on as the credits rolled. With the scene including Riddler and Joker at the end, I was watching that as it unfolded, thinking, no, that can't be Joker can it, and then it was apparent that it was - and I didn't really care for it.

Contrast that with the ending of Batman Begins. We don't see Joker. All we get is a playing card that Batman turns over to reveal it to be a Joker card. That's how you tease a major villain.

I'd rather see this series ignore Joker. Between Jack Nicholson, Heath Ledger, Jared Leto, and Joaquin Phoenix, I believe we've seen the Joker done enough. Let's see some of the other villains! Since they redeemed Riddler from the awful Jim Carrey version here, I'd love to see a similar redemption of Mr. Freeze. The Court of Owls would also be a great direction to go.

Back to The Batman, this movie was perfectly cast. I didn't think much of Pattison when I first read he was going to be the new Dark Knight, but yeah, he worked out great. I bought him in the role instantly. Loved Penguin (had no idea that was Farrell), Catwoman (although I think I still prefer Michelle Pfeiffer in an admittedly more goofy take on the role), and Riddler. Riddler was exactly what I thought he should be - a psychopath. I've seen comparisons to Seven for this, and I agree with them. He was intimidating up until we finally see his face, at which point he was just a nerdish guy with a penchant for riddles and killing. But damn if that opening sequence with him killing the mayor was not right out of something like Seven.

The score - yep, it's fantastic. Been listening to it all week at work, and while I've been on my morning walks. I'm not sure where Giacchino ranks for me in terms of his scores (loved this one, Rogue One, Star Trek, and Super 8), but he's not at the point where I'd put him in the same realm as John Williams or Hans Zimmer. That takes nothing away from his work on The Batman, which I'd rank as the best score since Silvestri's Avengers two-fer (IW and EG).

One final thought - many are going to say Pattison's Batman is the best, I'm sure. And I've already stated that he knocked it out of the park. But I'm not sure I can say his is the best. I'll throw out Clooney and Kilmer as I thought their films sucked ass (Clooney's damn near killed my interest forever in Batman, and I only saw Batman Begins on the last day it was showing theatrically due to that). So Keaton, Bale, Pattison, and Affleck. Each of these guys portrayed a Batman at different stages of his life: Keaton right in the middle of his time as the bat, Bale across the gambit, Pattison at the beginning, and Affleck near the end. I actually really like Affleck but that's more to the point of his films capturing a childhood love of the characters, and mixing them up as the Justice League (was a religious viewer of the Saturday morning cartoon) than in anything that Affleck did to make the role his. I didn't always like the voice that Bale had while in the batsuit; some times that was more WTF did he say than anything. Keaton was initially a WTF choice, given he was known for comedic roles like Beetlejuice and Mr. Mom, but I thought he did fine. I can't really pick one, as each of these guys did a great job, but I suppose if pressed, I'll go with Affleck due simply to that nostalgic feel I got out of seeing Batman go at it with Superman, and then working along side WW, Supes, and company to defeat Darkseid (well, throw a monkey wrench in Darkseid's plans).
StinkyPinky
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Always been a big fan of Robert Pattinson, has some of the best acting chops in recent times. Wasn't sure how he was going to translate in this role, but did a great job. He figured out a way to exploit subtleties in movement and body language to communicate in these amazing scenes. This is by far my favorite rendition. Definitely dark and lots of psychological thriller tactics for world and character building. I was expecting to enjoy it, and then grow weary of exploitation of the obvious sequels, but I've definitely subscribed to the future of this franchise and excited to see other characters take shape in the world. Fantastic effort by Reeves. I suspect he'll see lots of acknowledgement during award season.
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just back. Holy **** that was awesome. The Batman movie I've always wanted.
AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Making my way through this thread, but those saying we needed to tie up the loose end by having Bruce fix up the orphanage or announce the restart of the Renewal... no way. That's WAY too on the nose. It's like what would happen in the CW Arrowverse version of this story.

Also fixing up the orphanage in Wayne Manor is literally how TDKR ends.
StinkyPinky
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AliasMan02 said:

Making my way through this thread, but those saying we needed to tie up the loose end by having Bruce fix up the orphanage or announce the restart of the Renewal... no way. That's WAY too on the nose. It's like what would happen in the CW Arrowverse version of this story.


Exactly, that would be counter productive to what makes the movie work.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AliasMan02 said:

Making my way through this thread, but those saying we needed to tie up the loose end by having Bruce fix up the orphanage or announce the restart of the Renewal... no way. That's WAY too on the nose. It's like what would happen in the CW Arrowverse version of this story.

Also fixing up the orphanage in Wayne Manor is literally how TDKR ends.

There is nothing more on-the-nose that Bruce *literally* telling the audience the lesson he learned. That's straight up bad, lazy writing. I'm not a fan of the orphanage thing, as yeah, it was already done in TDKR. But just getting *some* kind of hint - however subtle - that Bruce Wayne is finally coming out of his shell, and is ready to engage/change Gotham in a positive way on that end as well, would have done wonders, and paid off a thread that Reeves himself established early in the film.
jackie childs
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Loved it…need to go back and read the thread.

But if we all just pretend the Schwarzenegger batman film doesn't exist, we could call this one Batman Se7en
FL_Ag1998
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

AliasMan02 said:

Making my way through this thread, but those saying we needed to tie up the loose end by having Bruce fix up the orphanage or announce the restart of the Renewal... no way. That's WAY too on the nose. It's like what would happen in the CW Arrowverse version of this story.

Also fixing up the orphanage in Wayne Manor is literally how TDKR ends.

There is nothing more on-the-nose that Bruce *literally* telling the audience the lesson he learned. That's straight up bad, lazy writing. I'm not a fan of the orphanage thing, as yeah, it was already done in TDKR. But just getting *some* kind of hint - however subtle - that Bruce Wayne is finally coming out of his shell, and is ready to engage/change Gotham in a positive way on that end as well, would have done wonders, and paid off a thread that Reeves himself established early in the film.


I'll agree you have a point, but I think I just don't like the suggestions thrown out so far....fixing up the orphanage, attending a press conference or some big gala as the "new" Bruce Wayne....nah, doesn't fit him yet.

But maybe just a very quick, passing shot of him strolling into a Wayne Industries board meeting. Something very subtle like that. A baby step.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Something like that would have been great. Going from Bruce not wanting to attend a Wayne Industries meeting with the accountants in the beginning, to willingly strolling into a board meeting with purpose, as part of a final montage. Just anything hinting at some kind of growth for Bruce, and not just Batman.
AgfromHOU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think the flood will be a major storyline of the sequel, so having a board meeting at Wayne wouldn't exactly be possible.
Cromagnum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brian Earl Spilner said:

They may have finally outdone The Dark Knight. That was so good.

I thought every single cast member was pitch perfect, but man, Paul Dano blew me away in that interrogation scene. That was every bit as good as the Joker interrogation scene in TDK.

Loved the score and sound design too. When the Batmobile revs up and the sound just slams you right in the chest...*chef's kiss*. Worth the IMAX ticket for just that.

So that was Joker at the end right? I have to say my one tiny nitpick would be that the voice didn't sound at all menacing and the laugh was kinda weak, but that may not even be the actor who plays the part, so we'll see.

This belongs right alongside movies like Seven, Zodiac, and TDK.

Hope this excels at the box office so we get another one.


Not a chance. Dark Knight was far better. This one was still good but drug on too long.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You guys are taking this way too literally. It can be at Wayne Tower, it can be on a boat, in an plane, the outskirts of the city, wherever. Just *anything* that shows follow through after the meeting Bruce didn't want to take earlier in the film. And not even a full scene, just some little peek or hint at something that's part of the end montage vibe we already got.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That said, I'm going to be disappointed if the flood is still a major hurdle in the sequel. It should of course be mentioned, and we should of course still see the efforts of Gotham being rebuilt, but if the city itself is still flooded, that's going to be super weird, IMO. I'm hoping it's at least a couple years later, with the water having receded for the most part, traffic back to normal, etc.
Madmarttigan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm a little torn on the ending because on one hand it gave us the amazing scene of him dropping through the stadium with the amazing score going beating the crap out of guys, but on the other hand why does every batman villain have to escalate to some destroy the city level event. The movie was really cool with the small scale murder mystery vibe and then it had to go full blown comic movie mode. They could have still attacked the stadium to go after the politicians but I think the flood was kind of stupid.

Why did Riddler let himself get caught and think he needed to flood the city. I understand wanting to keep going after city officials because they are all liars and corrupt, even the presumption that the future Mayor will be more of the same. Don't see why he had to turn himself in if all he wanted was a meet up with batman he could have set it up somewhere on his terms.

I did get goosebumps from his descent into the stadium so I will forgive the story that led up to it.

The story and heath ledger are still better in the DK, but I think this movie just gave us awesome batman moments. The bat mobile opening was ****ing amazing, the John Wick style club beat downs, the hallway scene, and the ending drop into the stadium were really good.

Also as said before, batman should not be getting shot so much good lord he isn't Iron Man. I think he took more bullets than Iron Man lol.
Formerly tv1113
AgfromHOU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm hoping the flood gives us an adaptation of the No Man's Land arc from the late 90's in the comics (but there it was an earthquake) in the sequel
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wasn't that kind of done already in TDKR?
AgfromHOU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I liked it more than The Dark Knight, and TDK was previously my favorite CBM, for context.

This was the first Batman movie I actually felt like Batman was the star of the movie.

Batman: The Batman
Villain: TDK because of Ledger and Eckhart
Side characters: The Batman
Alfred: TDK
Batmobile: The Batman
Score: pains me, but The Batman
Cinematography: The Batman
Editing/Script: The Batman

I love The Dark Knight, but to me The Batman is better in almost every way.
AgfromHOU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kind of, but it was mainly a Knightfall story and the separation of Gotham was really only in the third act.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well, you know what they say about opinions.

IMO, TDK is not as perfect as it's sometimes made out to be. Two-Face felt a little tacked on and the look of it is very unrealistic and cartoony. That hasn't aged great, and it doesn't help that Eckhart starts overacting the second he turns into Two-Face.

Also to me the pace suffers after Joker gets caught at the end. I feel like the movie is about 15 minutes too long. (Even though I do think this one could've been shaved down by at least 10 minutes or so.)
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Round two. The theater Thursday afternoon was only half full, and the crowd relatively subdued. Feel like I made a mistake seeing it that early, especially considering Pattinson himself showed up for the showing right after mine. Tonight, though? The place is absolute packed, and the crowd is electric. So stoked.

AliasMan02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

You guys are taking this way too literally. It can be at Wayne Tower, it can be on a boat, in an plane, the outskirts of the city, wherever. Just *anything* that shows follow through after the meeting Bruce didn't want to take earlier in the film. And not even a full scene, just some little peek or hint at something that's part of the end montage vibe we already got.


Should be a recovering Alfred sitting with some predatory accountant types then Bruce walking in and sitting down. Alfred smiles.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
https://screenrant.com/does-riddler-know-bruce-wayne-is-the-batman/
Lathspell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I would just be repeating a lot of what has already been said, but I really enjoyed the movie. I would personally put it just below the Dark Knight when it comes to Batman movies.

The cinematography in this movie floored me from the beginning. I couldn't tell you why I loved the way it was shot, but each frame was such a pleasure to see.

Immediately after the movie, I wasn't thinking about the end the way others here have. However, I do agree it would have made more sense to see him actually make a change as Bruce Wayne.

One small piece that I really appreciated so much, was the fight with Catwoman. I know it was mentioned earlier, but that made me so happy. Yeah, there was a woke statement in the movie, but that was completely in line with Selena's character. A "woke movie" would have seen our Batman go toe to toe with Catwoman and make it an even match for a girl power moment. Seeing this would have completely taken me out of the movie. The fact she couldn't even land a hit on the Batman was so perfect.

TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Somehow even better the second time.

Such an incredible experience, one made all the more entertaining when you see it with a packed, cheering audience who gives it a huge applause at the end (and lit up when the Batmobile first revved its engines).

I also caught so many more little clues/bits of dialogue this go-around, and the whole thing flowed better too. You can really see the structure of the thing, and neither time I've seen it has the runtime bothered me in the least.

One relatively subtle thing that stuck out this time, that I haven't seen mentioned much, if at all, is how fun all the twin scenes are, and how each of those scenes evolve each time they answer the knock on the door. I was listening to a podcast that really underlined this, and the first time he knocks it's as Batman, barging in through the front door, and having to fight his way through, of course met with all kinds of resistance. The second time he knocks, though, it's as Bruce, which, in contrast, gives him instant access/no resistance at all - showing (us and him) that *Bruce Wayne* can be an effective tool as well. Then, the third time he knocks, it's as Bruce Wayne AND Batman, using BOTH identities in harmony, to maximum effect, to first sneak in, then put on his Batman suit to kick some ass. It really is such a cool and effective manifestation of a character arc.

Speaking of the Iceberg Lounge, one funny thing I didn't catch the first time is that after Batman and Gordon capture the Penguin, tie him up by is arms and ankles, and then leave him at the abandoned building, he literally has to waddle after them - like a penguin - as he pleads. Such a great little touch. This movie really is pretty funny at times, or more funny than people seem to be giving it credit for, at least.

But yeah, overall, it just flat out rocks, on so many levels, looks even more breathtaking and iconic the second time around, and features so many incredible sequences. It almost doesn't make sense how much awesome is packed into this thing.

Oh, and Catwoman absolutely owns every scene she's. Kravitz is so crazy good on second-viewing as well.

All that said, I finally figured out what was bugging me so much about the exposition scenes. Each individual scene/info dump works on its own for the most part, and is totally fine in a vacuum. The issue I realized is that they're ALL one right after another…

- At the abandoned Batsignal building, Catwoman reveals to Batman that Falcone is her father, then TELLS THE STORY of her childhood, her mother, and Falcone.

-NEXT SCENE: Back in the Batcave, Bruce watches the news, which features a breaking report where in the Riddler TELLS THE STORY of Thomas Wayne and Falcone, which sends Bruce spiraling.

-NEXT SCENE: At 44 Below, Bruce confronts Falcone, Falcone then TELLS THE STORY of him and Thomas Wayne, as untruthful as it is.

-NEXT SCENE: At the hospital, Alfred TELLS THE STORY of Thomas Wayne and Falcone to Bruce, the version that's actually true.

-NEXT SCENE: Back at the abandoned Batsignal building, Catwoman plays the voicemail that TELLS THE STORY that implicates Falcone in her roommate's murder, then, seconds later, Kenzie TELLS THE STORY of how Falcone took down Maroni and took over Renewal, becoming the defacto "mayor" of Gotham.

For those counting, that's SIX consecutive expositional/backstory info dumps across FIVE consecutive scenes. In other words... a lot.

On the one hand, you can really feel the movie come to an abrupt halt for a good 15 to 20 minutes or so while all of those stories are told, a movie that had been absolutely humming before that point. But on the other hand, I would argue that all of the expositional information is crucial, none of it could have been revealed any earlier, and the movie *does* kick right back into high gear the second Kenzie reveals the final piece of the puzzle. Seeing as there's no doubt Reeves is aware of how much exposition he has to give the audience at this juncture, this time around it felt more like a *designed* sequence of scenes, where he just decided to bite the bullet and spill all of the info "at once," across a five-scene sequence. Which, in a way, makes it a bit more forgivable, and does allow the audience to take a breather of sorts before the final push to the end. So, while it's all still a bit problematic, I do give Reeves points for basically leaning into the issue, owning it for what it is, and making a deliberate sequence out of it, in which the story being told evolves piece-by-piece, scene-by-scene.

I'll also say that, while the Joker scene still sucks, I was able to concentrate more on the dialogue this time, which is actually really well written and clever. That, and I *do* kind of like that this Joker seems to have a slight New Yawk/Brooklyn accent, which makes sense and could at least be something different. Though, what little we do get to see of him still looks terrible - it looks like used hairspray to intentionally make his hair look "messy," and the prosthetics don't look right at all - but I am somewhat encouraged by Reeves saying he may not even use him the sequel. We'll see.

The last thing I'll say is that the movie was also somehow more emotional for me this go-around. Certain emotional moments definitely landed better, especially the Bruce/Alfred scene in the hospital, and the hand-holding there, along with, yes, even the final voice over, which admittedly worked a *bit* better for me this time.

I doubt I see the movie for a third time in the theater, but I won't lie... I do kind of want to. Though, knowing it'll be hitting HBO Max around April 19, I think I can hopefully hold out 'til then.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Brian Earl Spilner said:

https://screenrant.com/does-riddler-know-bruce-wayne-is-the-batman/

My opinion on this has changed ever-so-slightly. After watching the scene again, I think Reeves is actually leaving it somewhat ambiguous on purpose. Or, rather, the audience is free to interpret it either way, and that's the whole point of it. Because it really is such an incredibly and skillfully written scene, one presented on a razor's edge, where the Riddler *probably* doesn't know he's Bruce Wayne... but also just might, and could very well still be f/cking with him. I think the right answer is that there is no answer. It's probably one, but maaaaaybe the other, which perfectly encapsulates the Riddler as a whole.
AggieLitigator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Riddler knows. My opinion.
canadiaggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I thought Dano's line where he said something along the lines of Bruce being a mask and Batman being the real person was superb. Just stuck with me after the movie
All I do is Nguyen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
One of favorite things, and I'm not sure if it's been said, was the "bat mobile" or rather the Bat mucsle car. Holy balls in IMAX that thing tickled all the right spots for me. You can see Bruce's love for classic cars when he pulls up in the old Vette. But my god that muscle car just sounded AMAZING and looked just as good
No matter what!
Epstein didn't do, you know, the thing...
I'm the rare Astros/Cowboys/Spurs fan. We do exist
The Porkchop Express
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AggieLitigator said:

Riddler knows. My opinion.
I went with my wife Friday night and we haven't discussed it much since. I asked her this morning if she thought Riddler knew or not and she was 100% in the camp that he absolutely knows. All of his research into the history of Gotham corruption and all of his knowledge of where people are and aren't at all these different times of day just wouldn't add up to him not knowing Bruce's comings and goings.

P.S. - the Nic Cage movie trailer got a bigger reaction than anything in the film at our theater.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Still gotta rewatch but I definitely think the possibility is there.
Rocagnante
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Going to see it for a second time just so I can hear the Batmobile fire it up again on a theater sound system. That scene and the subsequent chase were badass!
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.