That baby wasn't in his future though (as far as we know.)
Brian Earl Spilner said:
Baby?
Brian Earl Spilner said:
Y'all lost me. How did we get on a WW baby?
WEll I'm not going to post my Dany as the Mad Queen essay 10 pages ago again,but it probably is a warning that you shouldn't put a ruthless Targ on the throne cuz they're nuts. Even more so with a dragon.bobinator said:
Yeah... it's hard to make all the pieces fit because we don't have a good feel for what exactly Bran is capable of, but I've never been able to get all the way past the fact that they had to set up and film that shot of the Mad King just for this vision. Everything else in the vision except for the Mad King scene are things that have (or look like they're about to) happen over the course of the show.
He pulls Hodor out of both timelines and CleganeBowl becomes a tag-team cage match: Little Hodor and Gregor vs. Big Hodor and Sandor.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Bran wargs into Jaime in two time periods and murders Aerys and Cersei simultaneously!
Social Media Influencer said:It's utterly unreadable at this point. Other boards can be fun some times due to more relaxed rules about profanity and topics, but it's ridiculous to have people starting individual threads for every single gripe or thought that pops into their heads.Quote:
There's 20 active threads on TD right now about GoT.
And like Zombie said, we could go to r/freefolk if we wanted uncensored spoilers talk.
Wait when did he enter the Mad King's mind? Or is that speculationBrian Earl Spilner said:
Oh ***** What if Bran only saw those 2 visions because they are in fact things in HIS own future?
ie. He actually does enter the Mad King's mind, and he is warging the dragon flying over KL?
Zombie Jon Snow said:Brian Earl Spilner said:
Y'all lost me. How did we get on a WW baby?
It's in Bran's vision - from way back.....the NK made a WW baby out of the last of Crasters male born.
PS - some people say we are not done with the WWs because of this - we never saw the baby's fate.
Marcus Aurelius said:
There are multiple competing/conflicting ones - so it's hard to believe all of them.
probably the best description of the final 2 seasons. so, why not shoehorn bran into the mad king?jenn96 said:
Bran influencing the Mad King is a very elegant theory. We just haven't seen any setup other than his vision, and to explain it now with so little time left seems like it will be extremely forced. My own thought is that it's more likely that the vision of Aerys was there to show viewers what Dani's father was like, so that when they have her do the Mad Queen arc there's more backstory.
Seabreeze said:
Yep, stay away from the interwebs if you dont wana know what happens.
WhoopN06 said:
No way he finishes the series. I've given up.
HtownAg92 said:
Here's a question about theories: why is it when there is someone with an unknown background, there is always a theory that they are a Targaryen? Even sometimes there are theories of "being a Targ" for people we know exactly what their background is (e.g.Tyrion). Why must everyone be a Targ, and why would it matter if they were?