Personally, even if the movie is dog**** (hoping it's not though), all is forgiven if they just announce Obi-Wan already.
I can see it. 2.5 hours of Kenobi playing in the sand, walking in the sand, sweeping sand, building sand castles, killing the occasional Jawa, accidentally stepping in Bantha poop....Brian Earl Spilner said:
Personally, even if the movie is dog**** (hoping it's not though), all is forgiven if they just announce Obi-Wan already.
Hell throw in a live action Ezra/Obi Wan/Darth maul scene lifted straight from Rebels, and you have me sold.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Hm. With all the reshoots, it just dawned on me that they could throw in something that might set up or tie into the Obi-Wan movie, considering how Rogue One referenced hyperspeed tracking and set that up for TLJ, and then TLJ referenced Han's dice. (Expect to see those a lot in Solo.)
Small details, but it does help everything feel connected and planned out together by one cohesive team.
Timeline-wise, Solo and the Obi-Wan movie could plausibly be taking place at the exact same time.
Does it really?Brian Earl Spilner said:
Everything hinges on that first trailer. They need a home-run.
For this movie? I'd say so. Most people don't even know about this movie, much less that it drops in 4 months.double aught said:Does it really?Brian Earl Spilner said:
Everything hinges on that first trailer. They need a home-run.
Brian Earl Spilner said:
Most people don't even know about this movie, much less that it drops in 4 months.
Brian Earl Spilner said:For this movie? I'd say so. Most people don't even know about this movie, much less that it drops in 4 months.double aught said:Does it really?Brian Earl Spilner said:
Everything hinges on that first trailer. They need a home-run.
SeattleAgJr said:Hell throw in a live action Ezra/Obi Wan/Darth maul scene lifted straight from Rebels, and you have me sold.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Hm. With all the reshoots, it just dawned on me that they could throw in something that might set up or tie into the Obi-Wan movie, considering how Rogue One referenced hyperspeed tracking and set that up for TLJ, and then TLJ referenced Han's dice. (Expect to see those a lot in Solo.)
Small details, but it does help everything feel connected and planned out together by one cohesive team.
Timeline-wise, Solo and the Obi-Wan movie could plausibly be taking place at the exact same time.
And yes, there is a reason the fight was so brief....
Brian Earl Spilner said:
Well, to be fair, this is the climax to the MCU that they've been building towards for 10 years, compared to an anthology movie that nobody wanted or asked for.
looks like an old samurai movie where two master fought, usually ended quick.DartAg1970 said:SeattleAgJr said:Hell throw in a live action Ezra/Obi Wan/Darth maul scene lifted straight from Rebels, and you have me sold.Brian Earl Spilner said:
Hm. With all the reshoots, it just dawned on me that they could throw in something that might set up or tie into the Obi-Wan movie, considering how Rogue One referenced hyperspeed tracking and set that up for TLJ, and then TLJ referenced Han's dice. (Expect to see those a lot in Solo.)
Small details, but it does help everything feel connected and planned out together by one cohesive team.
Timeline-wise, Solo and the Obi-Wan movie could plausibly be taking place at the exact same time.
And yes, there is a reason the fight was so brief....
And that reason is.....
Quote:
The instinct would be, and probably, I admit, the expectation, is for some kind of prolonged lightsaber battle. But I've done a lot of prolonged lightsaber battles over the years and I think what's most important about any kind of confrontation is what's riding on it. What's the tension going into it? It starts to matter less and less how you swing a sword or how creatively you do it if there's not a lot riding on it. []
It really is to express the difference between the Jedi and the Sith. Which is the Jedi become selfless and the Sith remain selfish. When pressed, because Obi-Wan is protecting someone else in the end, he does fight. But because he is so true and knows who he is in that moment, you can't defeat that. So Obi-Wan is going to strike down Maul because Maul is such a broken and lost person, which I think is why in the end you see Maul being cradled by Obi-Wan.
This idea is that Obi-Wan is willing to forgive this person who is so cruel and terrible because he feels pity for him. To his dying breath Maul is hoping there will be some revenge exacted upon his enemies. And in my mind, Obi-Wan expresses sadness there because that means that Maul has never grown and will never be released from his suffering. So I felt that moment had to be beyond a lightsaber fight and had to be more an expression of their characters.
Agreed.Quote:
Obi-Wan is a true badass
At what point was he not a true badass.redline248 said:
All that exposition is great, but really it's b/c Maul, as always, is arrogant and overconfident, and Obi-Wan is a true badass, at that point.
pshah. not even close, nerd!Farmer1906 said:Quote:
He was the first force ghost.
Basically, only time he came out looking like a ***** was vs Dooku, both times.Farmer1906 said:At what point was he not a true badass.redline248 said:
All that exposition is great, but really it's b/c Maul, as always, is arrogant and overconfident, and Obi-Wan is a true badass, at that point.
He took out Maul once before. He killed Grievous. He beat Dark Vader before he turned into a robot. He was the first force ghost. Obi is the GOAT Jedi.
force ghost, and chatted with Anakin. I believe they even got Liam Neeson to do the voice.....redline248 said:
Did he actually ever show up as a ghost, or just a voice? Been a while, can't remember
That is barely cannon and only a handful of people have seen it.SeattleAgJr said:pshah. not even close, nerd!Farmer1906 said:Quote:
He was the first force ghost.
QuiGon pulled that Ghostbusters crap back in the Clone Wars series.
So Obi >>>>>> Doku >>>>> Anakin > ObiBrian Earl Spilner said:
It actually kind of sucks they made Obi-Wan lose those two Dooku duels so easily. But I suppose they needed to do that to show how much Anakin progressed between Eps II and III.
Farmer1906 said:So Obi >>>>>> Doku >>>>> Anakin > ObiBrian Earl Spilner said:
It actually kind of sucks they made Obi-Wan lose those two Dooku duels so easily. But I suppose they needed to do that to show how much Anakin progressed between Eps II and III.
Makes no sense, but I guess it's about match ups.
Dooku could have killed him both times. In AOTC, Dooku hits him with 2 glancing slices instead of following through with any of them to slice off an appendage or cut him in half.Brian Earl Spilner said:
It actually kind of sucks they made Obi-Wan lose those two Dooku duels so easily. But I suppose they needed to do that to show how much Anakin progressed between Eps II and III.