quote:
quote:
quote:
Hey the prequels really aren't THAT bad. I've seen way worse movies.
You will get nowhere with this statement. It's like people have never seen really crappy movies.
We've seen crappy movies but these movies were
1)objectively bad
2)subjectivity complete crap when compared to Empire, stAR wars and even jedi.
3) just flat out boring.
Yeah I know, someone made some online review that pointed out all the problems with the phantom menace. I should watch it so I can get the proper attitude toward the prequels. Objectivity is not a factor for me in watching and enjoying a film; it is a completely subjective thing. I don't give a rat's behind if something does not meet the textbook definition of story telling or character motivation or dialogue or whathaveyou. The response that many have for the prequels is essentially the same thing you will get out of me regarding anything Quentin Tarantino has made (subjectively utter crap).
I get it. There are folks who don't like I-III. That's fine. For me I simply enjoyed the fact that I got to return to that galaxy far, far away. I saw parallels between the rise of Palpatine to how Hitler maneuvered his way to the German chancellorship, which as a WWII nut, this was interesting to me. There were things I did not care for - midichlorians, virgin birth - but there were many more things that I was perfectly fine with, mostly involving Ewen MacGregor as Obi-Wan.
Only one other episode can even think of favorable comparison with Empire, and that is ANH. In fact, for me, the only movie that I put into the same league with Empire is Raiders of the Lost Ark. Jedi is a movie with great bookends but a middle that features Lucas' new invention, the teddy bear. The Ewok crap bores me to death and is the reason I rate Jedi as the 4th best individual episode (and rarely watch that one).