You mean to people who are interested in learning the truth.
quote:
they failed to see the employee get out of the vehicle and go to work. had they seen that, the vehicle would not have been towed.
quote:
BS - 2 people were in the car. One went into work, the other walked across the strett. Spotter only saw the person walk across the street.
quote:
Basically she is claiming that the left lens of the spotters binoculars did not see her exit the driver side but magically only saw her passenger exit. Again, simple investigative techniques will destroy her argument.
quote:
there seems to be some confusion about what happened. A1 can you clarify what exactly the spotter saw so we can move on from this?
quote:
All parties involved know what happened.
quote:
C. You're fighting a loseing battle sir. If it's one thing that I learned from my fiasco, it's that no matter what you post people are going to twist it the way that they want to. I know what you mean by diverse but that doesn't mean that everyone sees it.
I for one don't see how letting the GB stuff over here is any good for advertising but I'm not a mod. If you take a look at the "Butthurt" thread on the GB you will find Techno's post.
quote:
just to clarify, from talking to my employee (who was unaware of any of the controversy on here) she told me that she drove to work with her boyfriend as a passenger. She came in to work after parking while her boyfriend left to go visit a friend at a nearby apartment. He is not a student and did not cross the street to go to class.
quote:
ac04. I'm not at liberty to comment on this subject, nor do I feel the need to. All parties involved know what happened.
quote:
He is not a student and did not cross the street to go to class.