Texas A&M Medical School; proud he is one of us and speaks the truth...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vM0Yr1uCQoL0/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vM0Yr1uCQoL0/
AggieHusker said:
He appears to be associated with AAPS (American Association of Physicians and Surgeons); or at least his name is on several published papers from AAPS.
The association with AAPS should be enough of a reason to question anything he has to say.
I couldn't get much past his self-proclamation of being well-grounded in epidemiology due to "seeing and examining more drug safety trial data than any doctor in current American medicine". Didn't realize stats were kept on that.
AggieHusker said:
He appears to be associated with AAPS (American Association of Physicians and Surgeons); or at least his name is on several published papers from AAPS.
The association with AAPS should be enough of a reason to question anything he has to say.
I couldn't get much past his self-proclamation of being well-grounded in epidemiology due to "seeing and examining more drug safety trial data than any doctor in current American medicine". Didn't realize stats were kept on that.
"Believe the doctors..."AggieHusker said:
He appears to be associated with AAPS (American Association of Physicians and Surgeons); or at least his name is on several published papers from AAPS.
The association with AAPS should be enough of a reason to question anything he has to say.
I couldn't get much past his self-proclamation of being well-grounded in epidemiology due to "seeing and examining more drug safety trial data than any doctor in current American medicine". Didn't realize stats were kept on that.
HowdyTexasAggies said:AggieHusker said:
He appears to be associated with AAPS (American Association of Physicians and Surgeons); or at least his name is on several published papers from AAPS.
The association with AAPS should be enough of a reason to question anything he has to say.
I couldn't get much past his self-proclamation of being well-grounded in epidemiology due to "seeing and examining more drug safety trial data than any doctor in current American medicine". Didn't realize stats were kept on that.
I'm not familiar with AAPS. Is your issue that they appear to be a conservative association?
Which part of what he said do you believe is wrong? Or, is your intent just to attack the messenger because you don't like the message?
Wow, just wow. I have an immediate family member that has spent years in an elevated position as a physician on staff at Baylor Dallas. The doctor you just ran down is highly respected by his peers as one of the very best at what he does. You clearly do not like him because it doesn't fit your political narrative. To question the man's grasp on the subject at hand is just pure ignorance.AggieHusker said:
He appears to be associated with AAPS (American Association of Physicians and Surgeons); or at least his name is on several published papers from AAPS.
The association with AAPS should be enough of a reason to question anything he has to say.
I couldn't get much past his self-proclamation of being well-grounded in epidemiology due to "seeing and examining more drug safety trial data than any doctor in current American medicine". Didn't realize stats were kept on that.
The Doc has impressive credentials and is courageously speaking up. And yet an anonymous poster on a social media site takes aim at him? If that weren't so sad, it would be funny.RafterAg223 said:Wow, just wow. I have an immediate family member that has spent years in an elevated position as a physician on staff at Baylor Dallas. The doctor you just ran down is highly respected by his peers as one of the very best at what he does. You clearly do not like him because it doesn't fit your political narrative. To question the man's grasp on the subject at hand is just pure ignorance.AggieHusker said:
He appears to be associated with AAPS (American Association of Physicians and Surgeons); or at least his name is on several published papers from AAPS.
The association with AAPS should be enough of a reason to question anything he has to say.
I couldn't get much past his self-proclamation of being well-grounded in epidemiology due to "seeing and examining more drug safety trial data than any doctor in current American medicine". Didn't realize stats were kept on that.
Windy City Ag said:
The AAPS did show it ass multiple times as nakedly partisan and politically motivated and the fact that this guy belongs to that organization does give me pause. That being said, he knows a whole lot more about medical issues than i do so I defer to his expertise.
Isn't even one death too many?Sandman98 said:
Can we talk about the claim that 4,000 people have died FROM the vaccine? That's an incredibly small percentage of the 100,000,000+ that have been vaccinated. I think we all agree Covid was falsely blamed for many deaths. Wouldn't the same premise apply to this relatively minuscule number of vaccine deaths?
Care to offer an organization in this climate that can't be accused of leaning one way or the other?Windy City Ag said:
The AAPS did show it ass multiple times as nakedly partisan and politically motivated and the fact that this guy belongs to that organization does give me pause. That being said, he knows a whole lot more about medical issues than i do so I defer to his expertise.
I won't chase you down the rabbit hole of paranoid conspiracy thinking. I will grant you that most NGOs probably have an agenda. All this being said, you have to allege political bias for those groups and then go digging for some smoking gun. In the case of the AAPS, they have signed their names to everything from fair critiques to lunatic ranting. Again, it is all on there website.Quote:
Care to offer an organization in this climate that can't be accused of leaning one way or the other?
CDC?
NIH?
WHO?
COVID-19 has been politicized since the beginning.
Even researchers at universities such as Johns Hopkins, Oxford, Yale, and Stanford offered analysis contradicting the wishes of those pushing COVID-19 restrictions and had a difficult time getting air time.
The theory that globalists are using COVID-19 to exert world-wide control should be given more attention. I'd think the people which have been fooled by the COVID-19 lockdown arguments would be very eager for a public debate on what's happening and why.
nawlinsag said:
The US avgs 869.7 deaths/yr per 100,000 people. That is 2.38 deaths a day/ per 100,000.
The US has vaccinated fully 135,000,000 people. So it is expected of those 135,000,000 people 3,213 will die every day.
Windy City Ag said:I won't chase you down the rabbit hole of paranoid conspiracy thinking. I will grant you that most NGOs probably have an agenda. All this being said, you have to allege political bias for those groups and then go digging for some smoking gun. In the case of the AAPS, they have signed their names to everything from fair critiques to lunatic ranting. Again, it is all on there website.Quote:
Care to offer an organization in this climate that can't be accused of leaning one way or the other?
CDC?
NIH?
WHO?
COVID-19 has been politicized since the beginning.
Even researchers at universities such as Johns Hopkins, Oxford, Yale, and Stanford offered analysis contradicting the wishes of those pushing COVID-19 restrictions and had a difficult time getting air time.
The theory that globalists are using COVID-19 to exert world-wide control should be given more attention. I'd think the people which have been fooled by the COVID-19 lockdown arguments would be very eager for a public debate on what's happening and why.
https://www.aapsonline.org/brochures/princip.htm
- Social Security is evil
https://www.aapsonline.org/alerts/autismalert.htm
- Vaccines lead to autism and heart disease
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/hiv-positive-is-the-treatment-worse-than-the-condition-asks-journal-of-american-physicians-and-surgeons-300047314.html
- There is no link between HIV and AIDS
https://aapsonline.org/oratory-or-hypnotic-induction/
- Barack Obama uses hypnosis techniques to force people to subconsciously vote for him, most particularly the Jews.
https://aapsonline.org/climate-change-alarm-supported-by-some-medical-journals-but-not-by-the-evidence/
- Climate Change is not real
https://aapsonline.org/states-seize-citizens-property-to-balance-their-budgets/
- The government should not be able to seize property
https://aapsonline.org/even-before-obamas-team-gets-started-the-bailout-package-tops-87-trillion-in-taxpayer-commitments-for-loans-guarantees-and-other-goodies-for-businesses-and-distressed-homeowners/
- The 2008 Economic Bailout was evil
https://aapsonline.org/a-tucson-arizona-physicians-commentary-there-is-more-to-the-story-of-the-tucson-shootings-2/
- The second amendment cannot be infringed upon . . .pro-2A
Rocky Rider said:Isn't even one death too many?Sandman98 said:
Can we talk about the claim that 4,000 people have died FROM the vaccine? That's an incredibly small percentage of the 100,000,000+ that have been vaccinated. I think we all agree Covid was falsely blamed for many deaths. Wouldn't the same premise apply to this relatively minuscule number of vaccine deaths?
Seems like that's the argument used by others when they wan to manipulate a discussion to their desired outcome.
Windy City Ag said:
The AAPS did show it ass multiple times as nakedly partisan and politically motivated and the fact that this guy belongs to that organization does give me pause.
That was dumb as well. A pox on all houses for supposed non-profit professional organizations that veer into social commentary.Quote:
As opposed to all the other medical organizations that said going out and protesting was ok while everyone else for any other reason should stay locked down?
Not sure of the relevance. The fact that the AAPS has been at it for decades is probably more of an indictment.Quote:
Why didn't you mention the dates of those articles?
Windy City Ag said:That was dumb as well. A pox on all houses for supposed non-profit professional organizations that veer into social commentary.Quote:
As opposed to all the other medical organizations that said going out and protesting was ok while everyone else for any other reason should stay locked down?