TheAngelFlight said:
Just about everything Dermdoc says is a one liner and attack on someone. That's the problem. That's why just about every thread he involves himself in, on this board or any other board, turns into a **** show if it wasn't one already.
Both of you ignored 2011's long post above and skipped over to turn up the personal feud.
Quote:
you stated that 'half of californians spend their week in a car by themselves in a car on the 405'.
that statement was absurd
your second statement is a much more rational and debatable point worth discussing. but it is not remotely what you originally stated.
Those are basically the same thing. I think if you weren't looking to be offended, you'd see they're certainly "remotely" related.
I'm not sure its all that debatable. A disease whose spread requires proximity let loose in the most dense and proximate populace in the country by a large margin?
There are other aggravating factors, but its difficult to even fathom how urban design hasn't played a major role in leading the NYC area down the path its gone.
Did you see that thread about the German study of "super-spreading events?" That's basically all of NYC every day on subways and sidewalks.
As of today, New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut are 1, 2, and 5 in infection rates. And it should come as no surprise that Washington D.C. is 6.
Louisiana is 3. New Orleans is a very public society and had Mardi Gras going on in. (We'll have to see where they track the outbreak to, for sure.)
Massachusetts is 4. Another fairly dense population that spends a lot of time on public transportation and in busy public spaces.
The states with low numbers are largely more on the rural/spread out side. Montana, North Dakota, Alaska, Oklahoma, etc.
the Bay area is heavily dependent on mass transit and densely populated and half the population of San Francisco does not spend their week in a car by themselves on the 405, or 101, 680, 280, or any other freeway for that matter. those two statements are not remotely 'the same thing'.
i've got no argument at all with the rest of your post, but i don't think I ignored his long post above.
using the Korean statistics as some sort of proof that we understand the nature of this outbreak is a problem.
they have tested only symptomatic cases - not sampled the whole population. until they do we don't really understand this bug yet.
their new cases are trailing off, and that does indicate they somehow caught this and contained it, but it says nothing one way or another about asymptomatics and actual infection rate of the overall population, as they are not testing asymptomatic (randomly testing) populace even today.
a lot about this mess doesn't make sense, beyond just South Korea. Wuhan having 5M people scatter to the wind across China after the outbreak but before lockdown, and not triggering mass outbreaks in other cities, makes NO sense. even with China lying their asses off, a major outbreak in Shanghai, Beijing, Shenzhen, or any other metro area with ongoing communication to export business markets, could not have been kept quiet.
only random antibody testing of the populations in each country will start to clear this up. right now we are groping in the dark, making massive decisions on partial information - decisions that will haunt us for a long long time.
We're from North California, and South Alabam
and little towns all around this land...