*****Aggies @ South Carolina - Sunday*****

97,124 Views | 1211 Replies | Last: 10 mo ago by Biggame12
jkag89
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:56p, 4/7/24
Nice play Travis!

Need this to be all the damage this inning Ags!
Reply Quote
4
jagged
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:56p, 4/7/24
AG
Great play in center
Reply Quote
1
Sharpshooter
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dabo man • 2:56p, 4/7/24
AG
dabo man said:
Quote:
I love people that use hypotheticals as though they're fact. And paint the entire board with one brush. Awesome, factual argument there.

This board is loaded with posters who complain each and every game thread that:
1) The umpire is bad
<AND>
2) The umpire is biased against us

It isn't a person here or there. Every game thread is loaded with these posts.

Once we have roboumps, the people who program them are going to be biased against the Ags and that will be the problem.
Fact.
Reply Quote
dabo man
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:57p, 4/7/24
AG
Texas A&M 3
South Carolina 6
-----------------
Bottom 7
Men on 2nd and 3rd
1 out
Reply Quote
Strike One
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:57p, 4/7/24
Great catch by Chestnut!
Reply Quote
5
KT 90
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to MR Gadsden • 2:57p, 4/7/24
AG
MR Gadsden said:
Heck of a catch from chestnut

Yes, that was outstanding.
Reply Quote
2
Aggies2009
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sharpshooter • 2:57p, 4/7/24
AG
Sharpshooter said:
dabo man said:
Quote:
I love people that use hypotheticals as though they're fact. And paint the entire board with one brush. Awesome, factual argument there.

This board is loaded with posters who complain each and every game thread that:
1) The umpire is bad
<AND>
2) The umpire is biased against us

It isn't a person here or there. Every game thread is loaded with these posts.

Once we have roboumps, the people who program them are going to be biased against the Ags and that will be the problem.
Fact.
You might need to check the definition of the word "fact" before you come here posting that.
Reply Quote
2
12th Man Ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggies2009 • 2:57p, 4/7/24
AG
Aggies2009 said:
12th Man Ag said:
Aggies2009 said:
12th Man Ag said:
Aggies2009 said:
12th Man Ag said:
Aggies2009 said:
12th Man Ag said:
jah003 said:
Alex580 said:
perfect inside pitch there damn
Uhh no. Unless 6 inches in and up is perfect.

This board would explode if one of our pitchers made that pitch and it was a ball. It was a great pitch.
I love people that use hypotheticals as though they're fact. And paint the entire board with one brush. Awesome, factual argument there.

It is as logical as yelling and screaming that it was a ball. The ball moved back over the plate at the end and Gavin flinched. We just like to complain. It was a strike.
No, it isn't.

The strike zone is defined. That ball was not in it.

I'm happy to get the Track Man data on it tomorrow lol

Scorecard says otherwise.
Ah yes. Ignore that the strike zone is a defined zone and just say, "Umpire is right!" I accept your admission of defeat. Thanks for playing.

If it isn't a strike, why are we whining when it is called a ball this inning? We should be glad the ump is getting it right now.
People are mad at the inconsistency and still referencing that he got it wrong last inning. Are you being dense on purpose?

Yup, that's it. Just dense. You seem to care a lot though. LOL!
Reply Quote
jagged
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:57p, 4/7/24
AG
Broadcast can't bring themselves to praise that catch, instead just call it good offense.
Reply Quote
Ag 11
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:57p, 4/7/24
AG
Good play on that ball. That looked like it could have cleared the bases
Reply Quote
1
Aggies2009
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 12th Man Ag • 2:58p, 4/7/24
AG
12th Man Ag said:
Aggies2009 said:
12th Man Ag said:
Aggies2009 said:
12th Man Ag said:
Aggies2009 said:
12th Man Ag said:
Aggies2009 said:
12th Man Ag said:
jah003 said:
Alex580 said:
perfect inside pitch there damn
Uhh no. Unless 6 inches in and up is perfect.

This board would explode if one of our pitchers made that pitch and it was a ball. It was a great pitch.
I love people that use hypotheticals as though they're fact. And paint the entire board with one brush. Awesome, factual argument there.

It is as logical as yelling and screaming that it was a ball. The ball moved back over the plate at the end and Gavin flinched. We just like to complain. It was a strike.
No, it isn't.

The strike zone is defined. That ball was not in it.

I'm happy to get the Track Man data on it tomorrow lol

Scorecard says otherwise.
Ah yes. Ignore that the strike zone is a defined zone and just say, "Umpire is right!" I accept your admission of defeat. Thanks for playing.

If it isn't a strike, why are we whining when it is called a ball this inning? We should be glad the ump is getting it right now.
People are mad at the inconsistency and still referencing that he got it wrong last inning. Are you being dense on purpose?

Yup, that's it. Just dense. You seem to care a lot though. LOL!
Dang. You went from "it was a strike" to "ump called it a strike" to "people are mad he called it a ball this inning" to "you care too much" in the span of about 4 posts. Awesome.
Reply Quote
1
Randy Rhodes
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:58p, 4/7/24
Damn it's hard to sweep an SEC team, but we can still do it
Reply Quote
Killzone3abc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sharpshooter • 2:58p, 4/7/24
AG
Nah if it's roboumps you have to take the L when you get calls you disagree with. It has a better view of the plate. Anyone with a semi functional brain will agree.
Reply Quote
jkag89
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jagged • 2:58p, 4/7/24
Home announcers, what do you expect?
Reply Quote
1
TheBonifaceOption
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to jagged • 2:58p, 4/7/24
jagged said:
Broadcast can't bring themselves to praise that catch, instead just call it good offense.

Well....between the two teams only one scored on that play
Reply Quote
1
Aggies2009
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Randy Rhodes • 2:58p, 4/7/24
AG
Randy Rhodes said:
Damn it's hard to sweep an SEC team, but we can still do it
For sure. We need Monty and Jace to get it going NOW, though.
Reply Quote
2
Sean98
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to dabo man • 2:59p, 4/7/24
AG
dabo man said:
Quote:
I love people that use hypotheticals as though they're fact. And paint the entire board with one brush. Awesome, factual argument there.

This board is loaded with posters who complain each and every game thread that:
1) The umpire is bad
<AND>
2) The umpire is biased against us

It isn't a person here or there. Every game thread is loaded with these posts.

Once we have roboumps, the people who program them are going to be biased against the Ags and that will be the problem.
To be fair I think college Umps are trash in general. I don't think they are biased, I just don't think they are good at what they do.
Reply Quote
3
jkag89
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:59p, 4/7/24
Need you here Brad!
Reply Quote
3
Aggies2009
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:00p, 4/7/24
AG
Nice, Rudis! Get us one more!
Reply Quote
2
12th Man Ag
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggies2009 • 3:00p, 4/7/24
AG
Aggies2009 said:
12th Man Ag said:
Aggies2009 said:
12th Man Ag said:
Aggies2009 said:
12th Man Ag said:
Aggies2009 said:
12th Man Ag said:
Aggies2009 said:
12th Man Ag said:
jah003 said:
Alex580 said:
perfect inside pitch there damn
Uhh no. Unless 6 inches in and up is perfect.

This board would explode if one of our pitchers made that pitch and it was a ball. It was a great pitch.
I love people that use hypotheticals as though they're fact. And paint the entire board with one brush. Awesome, factual argument there.

It is as logical as yelling and screaming that it was a ball. The ball moved back over the plate at the end and Gavin flinched. We just like to complain. It was a strike.
No, it isn't.

The strike zone is defined. That ball was not in it.

I'm happy to get the Track Man data on it tomorrow lol

Scorecard says otherwise.
Ah yes. Ignore that the strike zone is a defined zone and just say, "Umpire is right!" I accept your admission of defeat. Thanks for playing.

If it isn't a strike, why are we whining when it is called a ball this inning? We should be glad the ump is getting it right now.
People are mad at the inconsistency and still referencing that he got it wrong last inning. Are you being dense on purpose?

Yup, that's it. Just dense. You seem to care a lot though. LOL!
Dang. You went from "it was a strike" to "ump called it a strike" to "people are mad he called it a ball this inning" to "you care too much" in the span of about 4 posts. Awesome.

What? The you care comment is your obsession with my concession that it was a strike. Baseball isn't called on trackman. It had been called a strike against us all game. Swing the bat or get rung up. He got rung up on a super close pitch. It wasn't 6" inside. Enjoy the last 2 innings.
Reply Quote
1 edit
StinkyPinky
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sean98 • 3:00p, 4/7/24
AG
This. No favoritism, just aren't very good.
Reply Quote
Killzone3abc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:00p, 4/7/24
AG
There's the praise for that catch for whoever was complaining.
Reply Quote
1 edit
AgBQ-00
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:00p, 4/7/24
AG
It is every baseball fan's duty to gripe about the ump. It just is what it is. People who get bent about people griping about the zone are just as bad. This is not a discussion/argument that needs to bleed on every game thread. It is tedious and boring. Stop it
Reply Quote
2
TheBonifaceOption
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:00p, 4/7/24
There the announcers sent out a P.O.B. to chestnut
Reply Quote
1 edit
Aggies2009
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to 12th Man Ag • 3:00p, 4/7/24
AG
Will do. At least try next time.
Reply Quote
Sharpshooter
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Aggies2009 • 3:01p, 4/7/24
AG
Aggies2009 said:
Sharpshooter said:
dabo man said:
Quote:
I love people that use hypotheticals as though they're fact. And paint the entire board with one brush. Awesome, factual argument there.

This board is loaded with posters who complain each and every game thread that:
1) The umpire is bad
<AND>
2) The umpire is biased against us

It isn't a person here or there. Every game thread is loaded with these posts.

Once we have roboumps, the people who program them are going to be biased against the Ags and that will be the problem.
Fact.
You might need to check the definition of the word "fact" before you come here posting that.
Na. More like I need to consider the audience.
Reply Quote
jkag89
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:01p, 4/7/24
Shallow Dime! No advance!

Out of any non-scoring flavor now Brad!

IBB loads the bases.
Reply Quote
dabo man
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:01p, 4/7/24
AG
I thought for sure that was deep enough to be an RBI.
Reply Quote
Sean98
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Killzone3abc • 3:01p, 4/7/24
AG
Killzone3abc said:
Schloss said he was 100% in an interview before they left for Columbia.
thank you
Reply Quote
1
Killzone3abc
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to AgBQ-00 • 3:01p, 4/7/24
AG
AgBQ-00 said:
It is every baseball fan's duty to gripe about the ump. It just is what it is. People who get bent about people griping about the zone are just as bad. This is not a discussion/argument that needs to bleed on every game thread. It is tedious and boring. Stop it
Reply Quote
4
BeatHellOutOfTU
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:01p, 4/7/24
AG
Nice play… Ali trying to keep a foot on the base?
Reply Quote
Aggies2009
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Sharpshooter • 3:01p, 4/7/24
AG
Sharpshooter said:
Aggies2009 said:
Sharpshooter said:
dabo man said:
Quote:
I love people that use hypotheticals as though they're fact. And paint the entire board with one brush. Awesome, factual argument there.

This board is loaded with posters who complain each and every game thread that:
1) The umpire is bad
<AND>
2) The umpire is biased against us

It isn't a person here or there. Every game thread is loaded with these posts.

Once we have roboumps, the people who program them are going to be biased against the Ags and that will be the problem.
Fact.
You might need to check the definition of the word "fact" before you come here posting that.
Na. More like I need to consider the audience.
Um. You literally called a hypothetical scenario a fact. I don't care what "audience" you're talking about, that's incorrect.
Reply Quote
MosesHallRAB04
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:01p, 4/7/24
AG
Was on a plane. Why is chestnut in CF?
Reply Quote
1 edit
Aggies2009
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:02p, 4/7/24
AG
BIG K!!

Let's get some runs!!!
Reply Quote
4
dabo man
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:02p, 4/7/24
AG
Texas A&M 3
South Carolina 6
-----------------
Bottom 7
Bases loaded
2 outs
Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.