*****Aggies @ South Carolina - Sunday*****

97,131 Views | 1211 Replies | Last: 10 mo ago by Biggame12
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Moved to left field. Sorrel is out.
Aggies2009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
12th Man Ag said:

jah003 said:

Alex580 said:

perfect inside pitch there damn
Uhh no. Unless 6 inches in and up is perfect.

This board would explode if one of our pitchers made that pitch and it was a ball. It was a great pitch.
I love people that use hypotheticals as though they're fact. And paint the entire board with one brush. Awesome, factual argument there.
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sigh

dinks and bloops
HoustonAg2106
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
jkag89 said:

Moved to left field. Sorrel is out.


Got it
BeatHellOutOfTU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Come on ags
Killzone3abc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No he's just 0-2 with 2 Ks today. Why not put in Travis and hole for a spark?
dabo man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texas A&M 3
South Carolina 5
-----------------
Bottom 7
Men on 1st and 3rd
No outs
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
12th Man Ag said:

jah003 said:

Alex580 said:

perfect inside pitch there damn
Uhh no. Unless 6 inches in and up is perfect.

This board would explode if one of our pitchers made that pitch and it was a ball. It was a great pitch.
Of course we would want that pitch. Still does not make it a strike.
Killzone3abc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They're seeing Stewie too well rn. Come on Ags shut em down.
12th Man Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggies2009 said:

12th Man Ag said:

jah003 said:

Alex580 said:

perfect inside pitch there damn
Uhh no. Unless 6 inches in and up is perfect.

This board would explode if one of our pitchers made that pitch and it was a ball. It was a great pitch.
I love people that use hypotheticals as though they're fact. And paint the entire board with one brush. Awesome, factual argument there.

It is as logical as yelling and screaming that it was a ball. The ball moved back over the plate at the end and Gavin flinched. We just like to complain. It was a strike.
Aggies2009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
12th Man Ag said:

Aggies2009 said:

12th Man Ag said:

jah003 said:

Alex580 said:

perfect inside pitch there damn
Uhh no. Unless 6 inches in and up is perfect.

This board would explode if one of our pitchers made that pitch and it was a ball. It was a great pitch.
I love people that use hypotheticals as though they're fact. And paint the entire board with one brush. Awesome, factual argument there.

It is as logical as yelling and screaming that it was a ball. The ball moved back over the plate at the end and Gavin flinched. We just like to complain. It was a strike.
No, it isn't.

The strike zone is defined. That ball was not in it.

I'm happy to get the Track Man data on it tomorrow lol
BeatHellOutOfTU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That was the strike on gavin
AgBQ-00
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Let's get a strikeout and then a double play please
maxag42
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Where's the strike? Blue is so inconsistent.
Agdad081216
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1-0 was pitch that rung up Gavin
Just an old dad who raise 3 Ags. Inherited 2 more. GIG’EM
Sean98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Killzone3abc said:

No he's just 0-2 with 2 Ks today. Why not put in Travis and hole for a spark?
Do we know TC is a full go? Maybe he's not fully healthy?
AggieMD95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Don't call it a comeback
12th Man Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggies2009 said:

12th Man Ag said:

Aggies2009 said:

12th Man Ag said:

jah003 said:

Alex580 said:

perfect inside pitch there damn
Uhh no. Unless 6 inches in and up is perfect.

This board would explode if one of our pitchers made that pitch and it was a ball. It was a great pitch.
I love people that use hypotheticals as though they're fact. And paint the entire board with one brush. Awesome, factual argument there.

It is as logical as yelling and screaming that it was a ball. The ball moved back over the plate at the end and Gavin flinched. We just like to complain. It was a strike.
No, it isn't.

The strike zone is defined. That ball was not in it.

I'm happy to get the Track Man data on it tomorrow lol

Scorecard says otherwise.
Aggies2009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well damn. Loaded with nobody out.
TheBonifaceOption
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agdad081216 said:

1-0 was pitch that rung up Gavin

Yea...we are all thinking the same thing
Randy Rhodes
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Come on Stewart
Aggies2009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
12th Man Ag said:

Aggies2009 said:

12th Man Ag said:

Aggies2009 said:

12th Man Ag said:

jah003 said:

Alex580 said:

perfect inside pitch there damn
Uhh no. Unless 6 inches in and up is perfect.

This board would explode if one of our pitchers made that pitch and it was a ball. It was a great pitch.
I love people that use hypotheticals as though they're fact. And paint the entire board with one brush. Awesome, factual argument there.

It is as logical as yelling and screaming that it was a ball. The ball moved back over the plate at the end and Gavin flinched. We just like to complain. It was a strike.
No, it isn't.

The strike zone is defined. That ball was not in it.

I'm happy to get the Track Man data on it tomorrow lol

Scorecard says otherwise.
Ah yes. Ignore that the strike zone is a defined zone and just say, "Umpire is right!" I accept your admission of defeat. Thanks for playing.
Killzone3abc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Schloss said he was 100% in an interview before they left for Columbia.
TheBonifaceOption
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggies2009 said:

Well damn. Loaded with nobody out.

Time for a TP
dabo man
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I love people that use hypotheticals as though they're fact. And paint the entire board with one brush. Awesome, factual argument there.

This board is loaded with posters who complain each and every game thread that:
1) The umpire is bad
<AND>
2) The umpire is biased against us

It isn't a person here or there. Every game thread is loaded with these posts.

Once we have roboumps, the people who program them are going to be biased against the Ags and that will be the problem.
fc2112
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For some people, complaining about the ref is all they bring to the table. They must be a real joy to watch games with IRL
Killzone3abc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Screw this blind guy behind the plate. This is ridiculous. He's called that same pitch a strike on us several times but it's a ball for them.
Strike One
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another lousy call by ump on that last pitch!
Aggies2009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dabo man said:

Quote:

I love people that use hypotheticals as though they're fact. And paint the entire board with one brush. Awesome, factual argument there.

This board is loaded with posters who complain each and every game thread that:
1) The umpire is bad
<AND>
2) The umpire is biased against us

It isn't a person here or there. Every game thread is flooded with these posts.

Once we have roboumps, the people who program them are going to be biased against the Ags and that will be the problem.

Again, one big straw man argument based on a hypothetical situation. That's impressive, even for you.
jkag89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fc2112 said:

For some people, complaining about the ump or blue is all they bring to the table. They must be a real joy to watch games with IRL
FIFY
jah003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
fc2112 said:

For some people, complaining about the ref is all they bring to the table. They must be a real joy to watch games with IRL
I bring a lot of other stuff to the table. Still wasn't a strike.
12th Man Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggies2009 said:

12th Man Ag said:

Aggies2009 said:

12th Man Ag said:

Aggies2009 said:

12th Man Ag said:

jah003 said:

Alex580 said:

perfect inside pitch there damn
Uhh no. Unless 6 inches in and up is perfect.

This board would explode if one of our pitchers made that pitch and it was a ball. It was a great pitch.
I love people that use hypotheticals as though they're fact. And paint the entire board with one brush. Awesome, factual argument there.

It is as logical as yelling and screaming that it was a ball. The ball moved back over the plate at the end and Gavin flinched. We just like to complain. It was a strike.
No, it isn't.

The strike zone is defined. That ball was not in it.

I'm happy to get the Track Man data on it tomorrow lol

Scorecard says otherwise.
Ah yes. Ignore that the strike zone is a defined zone and just say, "Umpire is right!" I accept your admission of defeat. Thanks for playing.

If it isn't a strike, why are we whining when it is called a ball this inning? We should be glad the ump is getting it right now.
Aggies2009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Damn. 6-3.
Aggies2009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
12th Man Ag said:

Aggies2009 said:

12th Man Ag said:

Aggies2009 said:

12th Man Ag said:

Aggies2009 said:

12th Man Ag said:

jah003 said:

Alex580 said:

perfect inside pitch there damn
Uhh no. Unless 6 inches in and up is perfect.

This board would explode if one of our pitchers made that pitch and it was a ball. It was a great pitch.
I love people that use hypotheticals as though they're fact. And paint the entire board with one brush. Awesome, factual argument there.

It is as logical as yelling and screaming that it was a ball. The ball moved back over the plate at the end and Gavin flinched. We just like to complain. It was a strike.
No, it isn't.

The strike zone is defined. That ball was not in it.

I'm happy to get the Track Man data on it tomorrow lol

Scorecard says otherwise.
Ah yes. Ignore that the strike zone is a defined zone and just say, "Umpire is right!" I accept your admission of defeat. Thanks for playing.

If it isn't a strike, why are we whining when it is called a ball this inning? We should be glad the ump is getting it right now.
People are mad at the inconsistency and still referencing that he got it wrong last inning. Are you being dense on purpose?
MR Gadsden
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Heck of a catch from chestnut
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.