Naw, chili has no beans. Put beans in and you just made meat and bean stew.
quote:this is exactly what i was talking about as well. it's absolutely historically ignorant to say Texas chili is a specific package of ingredients.quote:
There are a thousand ways to make good gumbo. Throwing out absolutes is a great way to get errbody all riled up though.
Not much different than chili. I give people s*** all the time for putting beans in their chili (my dad makes his with pintos and kidneys with the Carroll Shelby kit and I'll eat that all damn day), but the fact is "authentic" Texas chili includes whatever the f*** the authentic Texan preparing it wants to put in there.
quote:Because only commies and yankees put beans in chili. Beans make it a stew. Chili is small cuts of meat slow cooked with seasoning until tender.
<to get even more off topic, sorry fido>
Exactly WHY does Texas Chili have no beans?
My argument FOR beans:
Assuming Chuckwagon food:
Beans travel well
Are filling
Are cheap
Can be washed off easily
Don't require much tending
Plenty of Mexicans and Texicans on trail
Historically used product
No beans argument has never held much water to me...
quote:
Cincinnati tries to claim themselves as some type of chili capitol of the world. They put beans in their meat stew. That shoudl tell you everything you need to know.
/drops mic
quote:
Nomad seems like a very dramatic person.
quote:why not just brown the chicken and sausage in the soup pot? No need to deglaze then.
Deglaze the pan with a cup of water and add to the soup pot along with the 8 cups of homemade stock