Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Pretty damn strong effort for Elko and Co on year one

2,418 Views | 21 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by Farmer_J
Texagsubscriber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NATTY OR BUST. BUST IT IS.

GIVE ME NATTY, OR GIVE ME BAS!!!
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Here comes the spin
texag101
How long do you want to ignore this user?
7 SEC teams in the top 10. Amazing.
Kozmozag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
1 2 and 3 talent is a step above the rest.
AgFan1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Data from Chat GPT (says sourced from 247).

Average recruiting calss ranking 4 years prior to championship run.

  • Georgia (2023): 2.5
  • Georgia (2022): 2.0
  • Georgia (2021): 3.25
  • Alabama (2020): 1.25
  • LSU (2019): 4.0
  • Clemson (2018): 14.5
  • Alabama (2017): 2.0
  • Clemson (2016): 18.0
  • Alabama (2015): 2.0
  • Ohio State (2014): 7.0

  • They do not have Michigan in there but provided the ranking data is correct, still interesting. Clemson is the exception...
    Honolulu Blue
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Recruiting outside the top 5. Honestly no shame in that. Agree with the tweet. Impressive especially considering the coaching change.


    Issue is getting that talent to have on field success. Weren't we top 5 in composite talent/recruiting rankings for our 2024 team roster?


    8-5. Same as usual.


    Need improvement in the trenches. (And maybe some coordinators…)
    Mr. Fingerbottom
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Emilio Fantastico
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    AgFan1974 said:

    Data from Chat GPT (says sourced from 247).

    Average recruiting calss ranking 4 years prior to championship run.

  • Georgia (2023): 2.5
  • Georgia (2022): 2.0
  • Georgia (2021): 3.25
  • Alabama (2020): 1.25
  • LSU (2019): 4.0
  • Clemson (2018): 14.5
  • Alabama (2017): 2.0
  • Clemson (2016): 18.0
  • Alabama (2015): 2.0
  • Ohio State (2014): 7.0

  • They do not have Michigan in there but provided the ranking data is correct, still interesting. Clemson is the exception...
    Clemson had a habit of getting a bunch of guys to stay for a 5th year so their recruiting classes tended to be smaller (< 20) which hurt the recruiting ranking. But they were still getting plenty of studs.And they weren't a "young" team either.
    LETTUCE PRAY
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Clemson gave Dabo time and were rewarded with 2 titles.. with average recruiting classes that were ranked outside of the Top 15. Amazing
    W
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    hopefully A&M got the right 4-stars this time

    and the true 4-stars

    not the misevaluated 4-stars
    DUman08
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Corn Pop
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    4 said:

    Here comes the spin


    Effective business model when people keep falling for it year after year.
    NoahAg
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    All that 3* TE talent adds up. 12-0 here we go!
    Jbob04
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Hard to get excited about it really. Next year is 7-5, 8-4 at best. Still have holes in our roster and I don't think we have an elite coaching staff either.
    Aggie Dad 26
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    4 said:

    Here comes the spin


    Vanderpumper has a sock
    one safe place
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Way, way, way behind teams 1 through 5 on that list, and they are out-recruiting us as well. Doesn't bode well.
    vander54
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    S
    Emilio Fantastico said:

    AgFan1974 said:

    Data from Chat GPT (says sourced from 247).

    Average recruiting calss ranking 4 years prior to championship run.

  • Georgia (2023): 2.5
  • Georgia (2022): 2.0
  • Georgia (2021): 3.25
  • Alabama (2020): 1.25
  • LSU (2019): 4.0
  • Clemson (2018): 14.5
  • Alabama (2017): 2.0
  • Clemson (2016): 18.0
  • Alabama (2015): 2.0
  • Ohio State (2014): 7.0

  • They do not have Michigan in there but provided the ranking data is correct, still interesting. Clemson is the exception...
    Clemson had a habit of getting a bunch of guys to stay for a 5th year so their recruiting classes tended to be smaller (< 20) which hurt the recruiting ranking. But they were still getting plenty of studs.And they weren't a "young" team either.


    Yep and its why Bud Elliot is so big on Blue Chip ratio. When looking at that since 2011 no team has had a blue chip ratio below 52% (Clemson). Michigan was at 53% last year
    World's worst proofreader
    TAMUallen
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Im glad that we are settling for strong effort from coaches now.

    Temper the expectations and minimize the disappointment
    Wabs
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    greg.w.h
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    4 said:

    Here comes the spin
    So that's why everything is spinning out of control…
    AGinHI
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Texagsubscriber said:


    #5 is our average ranking for the past 13 years

    which speaks more to being in the SEC and NIL than any effort on Elko's part.
    Farmer_J
    How long do you want to ignore this user?

    I think it's best for everyone if we go into next year with really low expectations.

    Refresh
    Page 1 of 1
     
    ×
    subscribe Verify your student status
    See Subscription Benefits
    Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.