I would reject the ever living shiz out of that slab, post tensioned or not.
Post tensioning is not supposed to be a method that takes chunks of concrete and holds them together. You still need proper subgrade prep (which you decidedly do not have here) and proper placement and curing (again, which you do not have here). Post tensioning sucks in general IMO, but I can guarantee you with 100% accuracy that the design parameters are not to squeeze cracks together but rather to provide compression on properly placed concrete to prevent structural failure.
Even of your concrete reaches design fc (doubtful given the failure here), you will still have settlement issues due to the failure and crappy subgrade prep and placement that led to it.
Any engineer or builder that tells you cracks that transverse the thickness of the slab and grade beam are of no concern and will be held together by the cables are full of crap.
Post tensioning is not supposed to be a method that takes chunks of concrete and holds them together. You still need proper subgrade prep (which you decidedly do not have here) and proper placement and curing (again, which you do not have here). Post tensioning sucks in general IMO, but I can guarantee you with 100% accuracy that the design parameters are not to squeeze cracks together but rather to provide compression on properly placed concrete to prevent structural failure.
Even of your concrete reaches design fc (doubtful given the failure here), you will still have settlement issues due to the failure and crappy subgrade prep and placement that led to it.
Any engineer or builder that tells you cracks that transverse the thickness of the slab and grade beam are of no concern and will be held together by the cables are full of crap.