Well ... I just got an email from the Parks Director. I expect this will be resolved very quickly.
After the reviewer's third dismissive response and continued refusal to acknowledge the prior structure, I sent a formal request for determination of calculation to the Parks and Planning directors, first citing the Code, explaining what occurred, and providing nine different forms of evidence to prove its existence. Ultimately the Parks Director has the authority to determine how the number of dwellings is calculated and what deductions and credits are applied.
This is what I submitted:
quote:
- Attachment 1 - HCAD records. These records show two buildings on this lot: A single family residence and a garage with second floor dwelling. both buildings were constructed in 1936. The garage apartment is building number 2.
- Attachment 2 - Utility Customer Service water bill. My water bill clearly shows I am being billed for a property with two (2) dwelling units. The account is coded as a type user 14, multi-family.
- Attachment 3 - Demolition permit, project -----. This demolition permit denotes it is for a garage with a second story. The sanitary sewer disconnect was finaled on August 4, 2015, the building was demolished on August 14, 2015, and the demolition final inspection took place on August 20, 2015.
- Attachment 4 - Property survey. The survey, prepared in 2003, shows the presence of a two-story garage.
- Attachment 5 - Site plan. The site plan clearly shows the existence of the garage apartment with proposed replacement of the structure.
- Attachment 6 - Wastewater capacity reservation. This document specifies existing development of "Garage Apt w/ washer/dryer."
- Attachment 7 - Photos. These photos show the presence of the building prior to and after demolition. Included in these photos are images of the interior, showing the presence of a functional kitchen, which is the determining factor used by Utility Customer Service to establish the garage apartment as a dwelling unit.
- Attachment 8 - Google Earth imagery from 1944, 1953, 2002, and 2014. Imagery demonstrates the building has consistently existed at this location for a minimum of 71 years.
- Attachment 9 - ILMS Data. This data shows the structure located at ----- and ----- are one and the same and is an apartment, abbreviated as, "APT."
As you can tell, I like being very thorough, but the more I think about this, the angrier it makes me. I take a lot of pride in my work and enjoy helping people resolve their issues. When issues get escalated up the chain and customers are angry and irate, I am the guy who gets to deal with it, so it's important for me to be thorough and do a good job. I actually get paid to get yelled at so front line staff don't have to get subjected to it.
Even today when I was being a customer, there was a guy in the lobby who was clearly frustrated and upset because he had been sent all over the building and no one knew how to help him. From what little I heard of the conversation, I knew exactly how to resolve his issue, so I gave up my place in line and took him into the administrative offices to help him. He left very happy and got exactly what he needed.
This plan reviewer does not seem to care, and that really bothers me.
Have we derailed this thread enough yet?