nu awlins ag said:

---

Skubalon said:

---

nu awlins ag said:

---

The PUF fund was established well before tceh was even thought of. Try doing some research first.

---

I know quite a lot about the PUF, thank you very much. And so should you. And none of that changes anything I posted.

---

It should or you wouldn't be crying all over this thread. I see you needed time to fact check me.

Sorry. Let me remind you that you brought up the PUF fund. No one else did. So what does it have to do with gambling? Surely you in all your infinite wisdom you can answer this.

---

My sincerest apologies for not sitting at my computer hitting refresh on the browser waiting for your reply. I will try to improve.

The PUF fund has nothing to do with gambling. It has to do with TVM's perspective about the academic quality of Tech as a university.

Do try to keep up. This is tedious.

Raiderjay said:

---

I don't think he should play and was very surprised by the judges decision.

I also don't believe all the holier than though statements from P4 teams, and believe that they would do the exact thing Tech has done in the same situation

---

I think someone like Michigan would. I'm not sure all P4 teams would.

As I stated though, I just wouldn't want the dude on my team. Too much risk there. I don't care about the publicity.

Skubalon said:

---

nu awlins ag said:

---

Skubalon said:

---

nu awlins ag said:

---

The PUF fund was established well before tceh was even thought of. Try doing some research first.

---

I know quite a lot about the PUF, thank you very much. And so should you. And none of that changes anything I posted.

---

It should or you wouldn't be crying all over this thread. I see you needed time to fact check me.

Sorry. Let me remind you that you brought up the PUF fund. No one else did. So what does it have to do with gambling? Surely you in all your infinite wisdom you can answer this.

---

My sincerest apologies for not sitting at my computer hitting refresh on the browser waiting for your reply. I will try to improve.

The PUF fund has nothing to do with gambling. It has to do with TVM's perspective about the academic quality of Tech as a university.

Do try to keep up. This is tedious.

---

Then why did you bring it up? You keep up.

If it was my decision I would remove him from the Team and wish him the best. The potential upside is outweighed by the downside for tech football and the university.

That's easy for me to say when my job is not on the line to win with millions invested to make that happen

But it just seems the right thing to do. I would make it more of a rally cry on the team "they say you guys can't win without Sorsby let's prove them wrong"

Agreed

some facts in this case, Tech was not a party in Sorsby's lawsuit, Tech did not file it, Tech did not fund it.....

Betting under age and across state lines etc. It's not getting better.

The ruling just stated he is eligible to play, Tech is saying they will continue to evaluate him and his recovery and if he will play.....

Joey said as much at the Houston TD club.....He is recovering, will he be ready to play? we don't know

.#TexasTech HC Joey McGuire speaking for first time in situation with QB Brendan Sorsby at @HoustonTDClub #BrendanSorsby #Big12 #RedRaiders #Wreckem #KPRC2 pic.twitter.com/AIvh9NgHIQ

— Randy McIlvoy (@KPRC2RandyMc) June 10, 2026

Skubalon said:

---

nu awlins ag said:

---

Skubalon said:

---

nu awlins ag said:

---

The PUF fund was established well before tceh was even thought of. Try doing some research first.

---

I know quite a lot about the PUF, thank you very much. And so should you. And none of that changes anything I posted.

---

It should or you wouldn't be crying all over this thread. I see you needed time to fact check me.

Sorry. Let me remind you that you brought up the PUF fund. No one else did. So what does it have to do with gambling? Surely you in all your infinite wisdom you can answer this.

---

My sincerest apologies for not sitting at my computer hitting refresh on the browser waiting for your reply. I will try to improve.

The PUF fund has nothing to do with gambling. It has to do with TVM's perspective about the academic quality of Tech as a university.

Do try to keep up. This is tedious.

---

Tech receives a lot of money from both the Higher Education Fund and the Texas University Fund, so its not like they have been left out in the cold.

Raiderjay said:

---

some facts in this case, Tech was not a party in Sorsby's lawsuit, Tech did not file it, Tech did not fund it.....

---

So Cody did?

TXAG 05 said:

---

Tech receives a lot of money from both the Higher Education Fund and the Texas University Fund, so its not like they have been left out in the cold.

---

The entire HEAF (or HEF if you prefer) doles out about $400 million annually across all the schools it supports, of which Tech is a recipient.

The PUF is worth about $30 billion and pays out about $1 billion every year to UT and $500 million every year to A&M.

It's really silly to compare them.