Baylor fans want to join the sec for an easier schedule
14,805 Views |
84 Replies |
Last: 6 yr ago by dixichkn
turboboost
Joined:
Oct 26, 2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In reply to Irishman
Holy good Lord, I thought it was some dumb **** said on this, but that green thing over there has me re-evaluating my analysis of TexAgs.
Holy good Lord, I thought it was some dumb **** said on this, but that green thing over there has me re-evaluating my analysis of TexAgs.
Whos this oxlong idiot
He's been on forum 16 littering the place there as well.
He's been on forum 16 littering the place there as well.
Was gonna post on that under The Tarp, but I'm perma banned. Thin skinned little *****es.
They've got 7 winning season's in the last 25 and think they can compete with us, Bama, lsu, Auburn, Georgia, Florida, etc? They must be drinking that Brazos toilet water because they're ****ing rtarded.
Irony is the guy from Baylor talking negatively about MSU's historic record and their getting lucky with hitting on a good coach who went on to better things
Quote:
Didn't Texas turn the SEC down due to their academic standards?
This is what living in a bubble full of weirdos sounds like.
That Waco weed must be potent stuff.
When Baylor joins C-USA they'll literally have the same strength of schedule as they do now.
Didn't Baylor also rank dead last in the BDF in early signing day?
Gigemaggies123 said:
Irony is the guy from Baylor talking negatively about MSU's historic record and their getting lucky with hitting on a good coach who went on to better things
In the Baylor fan's mind, College football didn't exist before RG3 arrived in Waco
Maroon Dawn said:Gigemaggies123 said:
Irony is the guy from Baylor talking negatively about MSU's historic record and their getting lucky with hitting on a good coach who went on to better things
In the Baylor fan's mind, College football didn't exist before RG3 arrived in Waco
It didn't exist then either.
Dude posted the link to this thread. All I can say is i've enjoyed reading both.
Sugar Bowl should be fun to watch
Edit - I think Baylor actually has a fair shot at beating UGA because they have some issues.
Sugar Bowl should be fun to watch
Edit - I think Baylor actually has a fair shot at beating UGA because they have some issues.
Georgia has close to half of their starters missing the bowl gamecoupland boy said:
Dude posted the link to this thread. All I can say is i've enjoyed reading both.
Sugar Bowl should be fun to watch
Edit - I think Baylor actually has a fair shot at beating UGA because they have some issues.
And yet if Cubtard wins there will be no talk of them beating a depleted UGA missing their star players
But then hypocrisy is a requirement to be cubtard
But then hypocrisy is a requirement to be cubtard
Baylor getting an easier schedule in the SEC? They played non-conference games against UTSA, Rice and SFA? Two bad CUSA teams and a bad Southland team?
Does anyone in Waco remember why their Big 12 One True Champion team was passed over by the playoffs for Ohio State? Oh, we play 9 conference games, so it doesn't matter. Even Texas figured out that they needed to upgrade their non-conference schedule to get into the playoffs.
Does anyone in Waco remember why their Big 12 One True Champion team was passed over by the playoffs for Ohio State? Oh, we play 9 conference games, so it doesn't matter. Even Texas figured out that they needed to upgrade their non-conference schedule to get into the playoffs.
Baylor won't be asking for that once their coach leaves for the NY football Giants
I love how they like to mention that OSU was without their QB and WR, but no word about us missing our best DL for that game. Not to mention they are about to play a Georgia team that will be without 8 major contributors on that team. Minus 8 players, they sure as heck better beat Georgia.
AGSWON said:
I love how they like to mention that OSU was without their QB and WR, but no word about us missing our best DL for that game. Not to mention they are about to play a Georgia team that will be without 8 major contributors on that team. Minus 8 players, they sure as heck better beat Georgia.
Or that we were without a backup RB for our one true freshman RB that was playing with turf toe.
DatTallArchitect said:Georgia has close to half of their starters missing the bowl gamecoupland boy said:
Dude posted the link to this thread. All I can say is i've enjoyed reading both.
Sugar Bowl should be fun to watch
Edit - I think Baylor actually has a fair shot at beating UGA because they have some issues.
And Georgia's not as good as their ranking indicates. We damn near beat them in their house (and would have in a fairly officiated game) in a game that meant something with our anemic offense.
I didn't want to go that far since our guys competed so well in Athens.......but yes they've been somewhat of a paper tiger since blowing their lead against alabama last year.
They don't have a good offense and Fromm is not a very good quarterback. In fact, I'm glad we have Mond instead of Fromm and I'm no fan of Mond's QB play.
DatTallArchitect said:Georgia has close to half of their starters missing the bowl gamecoupland boy said:
Dude posted the link to this thread. All I can say is i've enjoyed reading both.
Sugar Bowl should be fun to watch
Edit - I think Baylor actually has a fair shot at beating UGA because they have some issues.
How so many?
In all this noise, they seem to forget that they LOST to Texas Tech this year. It's only in the win column because the refs totally blew a GAME ENDING call in Balol's favor.
Over
Rated.
Over
Rated.
They also beat West Virginia 17-14.
Sounds like a line out of an E.L James book.LatinAggie1997 said:
These folks want a spanking with a belt to avoid having a slap on the hand.
Brilliant.
This didn't go well for them
Muy said:DatTallArchitect said:Georgia has close to half of their starters missing the bowl gamecoupland boy said:
Dude posted the link to this thread. All I can say is i've enjoyed reading both.
Sugar Bowl should be fun to watch
Edit - I think Baylor actually has a fair shot at beating UGA because they have some issues.
How so many?
Georgia's schtick is that they're a gateway to the NFL. They recruit kids with that pitch and the end result ends up being that they quit in turn when they're close to getting to the league.
Are the players listed with "Undisclosed" reasons all planning on entering the draft or did a group of them get in trouble?
They don't want to join the SEC anymore:
https://sicem365.com/s/5950/game-day-thread-7-baylor-11-2-vs-5-georgia-11-2/2/0#discussion
https://sicem365.com/s/5950/game-day-thread-7-baylor-11-2-vs-5-georgia-11-2/2/0#discussion
Will myTexAgs log-in work over at Sic'Em365?Adorable Mason Reeves said:
They don't want to join the SEC anymore:
https://sicem365.com/s/5950/game-day-thread-7-baylor-11-2-vs-5-georgia-11-2/2/0#discussion
Muy said:
Are the players listed with "Undisclosed" reasons all planning on entering the draft or did a group of them get in trouble?
I'm guessing the latter.
Featured Stories
See All
Jones aspires to join A&M's lineage of great defensive ends
by Olin Buchanan
14:22
1d ago
7.1k
Doubleheader sweep clinches second straight SEC series victory
by Richard Zane
Spring Football Snippets: Practice No. 8
by Olin Buchanan
13:35
1d ago
3.0k
Ford & Co. wins top-15 SEC series with UGA
by Kayla Gaither
47:54
17h ago
2.0k