tangelox said:

---

You haven't played LSU yet so it's impossible to compare that. However, the aggies throw the ball more times per game than Texas so your whole tard, sip T-shirt rant seems pointless. You don't appear to have watched an A&M game this year, maybe you are a sip or a tard.

---

Wanna wager that we throw it more than 48 times against LSU? We threw 42 times vs Clemson and 49 times vs Auburn. That 49 will be an anomaly for the year. Counting total season average is stupid for us because half our games are against puds. I don't count puds when really doing any analysis, because in the SEC we have so few of them, that's why at this point, the average per game is skewed.

I can understand some dumbass Big 12 fan confusing puds with conference games because for you, they are the same.

I would bet you throw 45, you may not get to 48 your coach likes to slow down losses to keep them close. You have thrown the ball far more as a percentage of your plays than the longhorns. With your oline I would assume that increases as you get into your insane schedule.

Wouldn't "puds" decrease the season average don't you flex your SECSEC muscle against "puds" and establish the run?

tangelox said:

---

Wouldn't "puds" decrease the season average don't you flex your SECSEC muscle against "puds" and establish the run?

---

Maybe that's why sippy has fewer passing attempts that A&M now? Half our games have been against top 10 teams.

Can't say I pay much attention to puds, or our stats around them because we play so few during the year. Big 12 should be the expert in this category

Ill leave this conversation with this. 1 fan base in the country, and I would assume even in your case it's a vocal minority, would take Mond over Ellinger. That doesn't make you smarter than the rest of the country, no matter how much the echo chamber here will pretend it does. If you will move the wager down from 48 to 45 passes vs LSU, hit me up, I'll take the wager.

jblaschke said:

---

tangelox said:

---

You haven't played LSU yet so it's impossible to compare that. However, the aggies throw the ball more times per game than Texas so your whole tard, sip T-shirt rant seems pointless. You don't appear to have watched an A&M game this year, maybe you are a sip or a tard.

---

Wanna wager that we throw it more than 48 times against LSU? We threw 42 times vs Clemson and 49 times vs Auburn. That 49 will be an anomaly for the year. Counting total season average is stupid for us because half our games are against puds. I don't count puds when really doing any analysis, because in the SEC we have so few of them, that's why at this point, the average per game is skewed.

I can understand some dumbass Big 12 fan confusing puds with conference games because for you, they are the same.

---

The sec has more "puds" than the Big 12

Your Friend said:

---

jblaschke said:

---

tangelox said:

---

You haven't played LSU yet so it's impossible to compare that. However, the aggies throw the ball more times per game than Texas so your whole tard, sip T-shirt rant seems pointless. You don't appear to have watched an A&M game this year, maybe you are a sip or a tard.

---

Wanna wager that we throw it more than 48 times against LSU? We threw 42 times vs Clemson and 49 times vs Auburn. That 49 will be an anomaly for the year. Counting total season average is stupid for us because half our games are against puds. I don't count puds when really doing any analysis, because in the SEC we have so few of them, that's why at this point, the average per game is skewed.

I can understand some dumbass Big 12 fan confusing puds with conference games because for you, they are the same.

---

The sec has more "puds" than the Big 12

---

Big 12 is a conference of puds.
Baylor, Kansas and tard are given bottom dwellers. However, even the teams that were supposed to be good totally suck.
TCU lost to SMU (LMAO)
WVA got the everlivin' **** kicked out of them by Missouri
Iowa State damn near lost to Northern Iowa
Kansas State, which may actually be your second best team had to have a miracle to beat Mississippi State, which probably won't have a winning conference record this year (congrats on that conference defining win)
Hell, your team had to cheat to squeak by Oklahoma State.

And when I said "your" team, I meant the team you root for.

jblaschke said:

---

Your Friend said:

---

jblaschke said:

---

tangelox said:

---

You haven't played LSU yet so it's impossible to compare that. However, the aggies throw the ball more times per game than Texas so your whole tard, sip T-shirt rant seems pointless. You don't appear to have watched an A&M game this year, maybe you are a sip or a tard.

---

Wanna wager that we throw it more than 48 times against LSU? We threw 42 times vs Clemson and 49 times vs Auburn. That 49 will be an anomaly for the year. Counting total season average is stupid for us because half our games are against puds. I don't count puds when really doing any analysis, because in the SEC we have so few of them, that's why at this point, the average per game is skewed.

I can understand some dumbass Big 12 fan confusing puds with conference games because for you, they are the same.

---

The sec has more "puds" than the Big 12

---

Big 12 is a conference of puds.
Baylor, Kansas and tard are given bottom dwellers. However, even the teams that were supposed to be good totally suck.
TCU lost to SMU (LMAO)
WVA got the everlivin' **** kicked out of them by Missouri
Iowa State damn near lost to Northern Iowa
Kansas State, which may actually be your second best team had to have a miracle to beat Mississippi State, which probably won't have a winning conference record this year (congrats on that conference defining win)
Hell, your team had to cheat to squeak by Oklahoma State.

And when I said "your" team, I meant the team you root for.

---

The key point in this slam dunk was naming three teams without reference to any of their results this season. Following that up with two losses and a near loss by other BIg 12 teams was just icing on the cake.

It's going to take the better part of the night, but I will research to see if there is even a loss out there by an SEC cellar dweller that may bear mentioning. This is just doing due diligence, as it's hard to see how anything could be worse than what Jb posted. There might not be any losses at all, much less hilariously historic gaffes.

tangelox said:

---

I would bet you throw 45, you may not get to 48 your coach likes to slow down losses to keep them close. You have thrown the ball far more as a percentage of your plays than the longhorns. With your oline I would assume that increases as you get into your insane schedule.

---

Why would he slow down when our defense is light years better than your absolutely terrible defense? How many yards would Bo Nix throw for on Texas' horrendous secondary? 400? He threw for 100 against us.

You realize controlling possession of the ball is actually a strategy that teams that actually win national titles use, correct? Hurry up, Air Raid teams have yet to sniff one. Why? Because their defenses are garbage, often due to talent but just as much due to being exhausted. Teams that win national titles protect their defense because they're not stupid enough to believe the offenses only job is to score. That isn't their only job.

tangelox said:

---

Ill leave this conversation with this. 1 fan base in the country, and I would assume even in your case it's a vocal minority, would take Mond over Ellinger. That doesn't make you smarter than the rest of the country, no matter how much the echo chamber here will pretend it does. If you will move the wager down from 48 to 45 passes vs LSU, hit me up, I'll take the wager.

---

You've polled every fan base in America? Ehlinger is an average QB. He plays a terrible schedule with hardly any NFL talent on it.

Flexbone said:

---

tangelox said:

---

I would bet you throw 45, you may not get to 48 your coach likes to slow down losses to keep them close. You have thrown the ball far more as a percentage of your plays than the longhorns. With your oline I would assume that increases as you get into your insane schedule.

---

Why would he slow down when our defense is light years better than your absolutely terrible defense? How many yards would Bo Nix throw for on Texas' horrendous secondary? 400? He threw for 100 against us.

You realize controlling possession of the ball is actually a strategy that teams that actually win national titles use, correct? Hurry up, Air Raid teams have yet to sniff one. Why? Because their defenses are garbage, often due to talent but just as much due to being exhausted. Teams that win national titles protect their defense because they're not stupid enough to believe the offenses only job is to score. That isn't their only job.

---

How's that working out?

Your Friend said:

---

Flexbone said:

---

tangelox said:

---

I would bet you throw 45, you may not get to 48 your coach likes to slow down losses to keep them close. You have thrown the ball far more as a percentage of your plays than the longhorns. With your oline I would assume that increases as you get into your insane schedule.

---

Why would he slow down when our defense is light years better than your absolutely terrible defense? How many yards would Bo Nix throw for on Texas' horrendous secondary? 400? He threw for 100 against us.

You realize controlling possession of the ball is actually a strategy that teams that actually win national titles use, correct? Hurry up, Air Raid teams have yet to sniff one. Why? Because their defenses are garbage, often due to talent but just as much due to being exhausted. Teams that win national titles protect their defense because they're not stupid enough to believe the offenses only job is to score. That isn't their only job.

---

How's that working out?

---

Well, our record through our coach's first year and to now is better than yours. How's yours working out? We've lost to #1 and #7. You just went down to the wire, and should have lost, to Oklahoma State. Do you have an actual counter argument to my point? Or is your counter argument that because we won't win an N.C. in Year 2 while playing in the toughest and most talented division in football, what we do won't work?

Why would you ever let a freshman throw when you can run for 200 yards?

Why should we have lost to Ok St?

Your Friend said:

---

Why should we have lost to Ok St?

---

Have you seen Sam Ehlinger play in person? With as much as you're on here e-defending him on a daily basis, it's almost like you'd be at every game, you weird b-stard.

he put up 400 yards on a defense with two dbs and an lb projected to go in the first two rounds next year

tshirtmoron said:

---

he put up 400 yards on a defense with two dbs and an lb projected to go in the first two rounds next year

---

How did Kellen Mond do against Clemson last year? Did they get anyone drafted?

Your Friend said:

---

Why should we have lost to Ok St?

---

Because they outplayed you? Did you watch the game?

tangelox said:

---

Why would you ever let a freshman throw when you can run for 200 yards?

---

Let's compare our "bad" defensive games to yours.

Again I don't have a yours I root for both teams, I just think ellngher is a very good college qb. Also their is no way to compare the defenses the offenses they have played aren't at all comparable. LSU at the end of the year maybe the only real comparison. That being said no doubt A&M has the better secondary. UT seems to play the run well but it's the same issue, why would anyone try and establish the run against them.

Flexbone said:

---

Your Friend said:

---

Why should we have lost to Ok St?

---

Because they outplayed you? Did you watch the game?

---

I think you need to rewatch the game

Okie state was two muffed punts away from being blown out, Texas wasn't out played in that game.

how'd he do two weeks ago?

tshirtmoron said:

---

how'd he do two weeks ago?

---

Are we judging QBs on their worst games?

tangelox said:

---

Okie state was two muffed punts away from being blown out, Texas wasn't out played in that game.

---

Uh, Texas was 2 fgs that Gundy didn't kick from being tied. Are you really trying to argue that MUFFED PUNTS aren't part of a team's play? Are interceptions? Fumbles? Oregon State scored the same number of points against Oklahoma State.

it's pretty obvious that LSUs defense sucks right now. Losing the guys they lost and running that offense are taking their toll.

Your Friend said:

---

Flexbone said:

---

Your Friend said:

---

Why should we have lost to Ok St?

---

Because they outplayed you? Did you watch the game?

---

I think you need to rewatch the game

---

Does it ever get exhausting being on here all day e-defending a school that you didn't go to? Jesus, I guess your job isn't important enough for your company to notice that you don't do sh-t for them.

tangelox said:

---

Again I don't have a yours I root for both teams, I just think ellngher is a very good college qb. Also their is no way to compare the defenses the offenses they have played aren't at all comparable. LSU at the end of the year maybe the only real comparison. That being said no doubt A&M has the better secondary. UT seems to play the run well but it's the same issue, why would anyone try and establish the run against them.

---

You're insinuating that Clemson is not a good offensive team?

I thought you left. Why don't you take your turn in Ehlingers glory hole over on a horn board if you like the guy so much.

Absolutely muffed punts happen once or twice per year. Happening twice in a game is rare. First was a freshman being a freshman 2nd was a coaching issue. It happens but I'd say its more rare than Gundy baking weird decisions on offense.

Flexbone said:

---

tangelox said:

---

Okie state was two muffed punts away from being blown out, Texas wasn't out played in that game.

---

Uh, Texas was 2 fgs that Gundy didn't kick from being tied. Are you really trying to argue that MUFFED PUNTS aren't part of a team's play? Are interceptions? Fumbles? Oregon State scored the same number of points against Oklahoma State.

it's pretty obvious that LSUs defense sucks right now. Losing the guys they lost and running that offense are taking their toll.

---

TOP is going to kill that team down the stretch.

Muffed punts are a little different in that they are unforced errors. And Herman also passed on a FG attempt in the 2H. Either way, I'm not sure how anyone after watching that game could claim Ok St outplayed Texas.

Clemson went up 24 to 3 and coasted. A&M was very good against the run vs Clemson. I was surprised to see them be so bad vs Auburn.

tangelox said:

---

Clemson went up 24 to 3 and coasted. A&M was very good against the run vs Clemson. I was surprised to see them be so bad vs Auburn.

---

Haha you don't know anything about A&M's team aside from the scores.

Your Friend said:

---

Flexbone said:

---

Your Friend said:

---

Why should we have lost to Ok St?

---

Because they outplayed you? Did you watch the game?

---

I think you need to rewatch the game

---

Which part? The part where Oklahoma State faked a FG because they got robbed from it being first and goal at the 3?

I've watched All 3 Aggie games this year.