Oy vey!Quote:
Texas in the Big 10 for football, the ACC for basketball and the SEC for baseball. The academics get both the CIC and the ACC. Money, money, money.
How's that for an option?
Quote:
Texas in the Big 10 for football, the ACC for basketball and the SEC for baseball. The academics get both the CIC and the ACC. Money, money, money.
How's that for an option?
Whomever offers the most money. Because Quidditch games are in high demand for NetFlix streaming.BizAg83 said:Quote:
Texas in the Big 10 for football, the ACC for basketball and the SEC for baseball. The academics get both the CIC and the ACC. Money, money, money.
How's that for an option?
Where's the landing spot for that vaunted Quidditch team? The suspense is killing me.
aggiehawg said:
More from Randy:Oy vey!Quote:
Texas in the Big 10 for football, the ACC for basketball and the SEC for baseball. The academics get both the CIC and the ACC. Money, money, money.
How's that for an option?
Excuse me??RGLAG85 said:aggiehawg said:
More from Randy:Oy vey!Quote:
Texas in the Big 10 for football, the ACC for basketball and the SEC for baseball. The academics get both the CIC and the ACC. Money, money, money.
How's that for an option?
I'm just not sure who is more insane, randy or the imbecile you actually believe him. I'm beginning to think he's chip's alter ego with his predictions.
realestateguru said:
Never fails...Quote:
Texas "probably" does not want to join the SEC?!
If the President of UT Austin even mentioned an interest in tossng aside academic considerations to associating the university with the redneck SEC, he would be driven from his position and his career outside the world of redneck academia.
The idiot SEC fans seem not to be able to comprehend this facet of the culture of UT Austin.
Ain't. Never. Gonna. Happen.
It doesn't matter how many SEC schools have anything to say about the subject. There is one school that has the final say on the subject. That school is UT Austin.
Never. Gonna. Happen. SEC academics suck and there isn't a possibility in Hell of the redneck farm schools improving their academics in the next 50 years.
UT has a branch college as a member of the SEC. That is about as close as we want to get to "that conference."Quote:
Given its first choice, UT Austin would become a member of the Ivy League and let their athletics affiliate with another conference or be independent. How does anyone other than a dumb**** redneck think the best compromise to that would be to affiliate with the SEC?
aggiehawg said:Excuse me??RGLAG85 said:aggiehawg said:
More from Randy:Oy vey!Quote:
Texas in the Big 10 for football, the ACC for basketball and the SEC for baseball. The academics get both the CIC and the ACC. Money, money, money.
How's that for an option?
I'm just not sure who is more insane, randy or the imbecile you actually believe him. I'm beginning to think he's chip's alter ego with his predictions.
aggiehawg said:
And then good ol' Randy turns around and posts this:Quote:
The point is that it is unquestioned that schools can be in different conferences for different sports.
UT Austin is the financial 800 lb gorilla of college sports. That is also unquestioned.
UT Austin will never affiliate with the SEC because of their academics. But don't kid yourself for a second thinking that any conference commissioner, including Sankey, wouldn't drool over the possibility of having any one of UT's major sports into their conference.
Just as OU was at the center of reinventing college sports in the 1980s, UT could do the same by being in multiple conferences for various sports.
Just wait until OU and UT become free agent properties. Just wait.
aggiehawg said:
My bad. The "you" threw me for a moment.
We're cool.
I bet he does too, that's why his wife left him for Rock the good Ag!Cynical_Texan said:
I'm betting Randy has something named Lil' Bevo.
aggiehawg said:
And then good ol' Randy turns around and posts this:Quote:
Just wait until OU and UT become free agent properties. Just wait.
Perhaps it will be the conference realignment search of a generation. One that you can tell your grandkids about.AlaskanAg99 said:aggiehawg said:
And then good ol' Randy turns around and posts this:Quote:
Just wait until OU and UT become free agent properties. Just wait.
9 more years to wait. Then you'll see! 9 short years until unmitigated glory, then we'll be Back, for sure. No doubt. Just wait Nine More Years!
just show that he sees nothing beyond his own little tin-foil-lined, Texas Aggie-related research decorated room to what the real actual outside world thinks.Quote:
UT Austin is the financial 800 lb gorilla of college sports. That is also unquestioned.
proves that he really DOESN'T do much actual research at all.Quote:
UT Austin will never affiliate with the SEC because of their academics.
Oh MAYNE. Randy will be so psyched, he'll piss his straitjacket.AlaskanAg99 said:aggiehawg said:
And then good ol' Randy turns around and posts this:Quote:
Just wait until OU and UT become free agent properties. Just wait.
9 more years to wait. Then you'll see! 9 short years until unmitigated glory, then we'll be Back, for sure. No doubt. Just wait Nine More Years!
Quote:
**** administrators don't understand they have a fiduciary responsibility to the taxpayers of the state of Texas. ****'s opinion that **** is run for the benefit of their alumni and administrators and they can do as they please is $#@!ing hilarious. If UT wanted into the SEC, the **** administrators would be told what to do and they would do as they were told. There are far more important considerations involved than dealing with the petty insecurities of the $#@!ing rednecks. UT administrators made sure **** was admitted into the AAU. No $#@!ing redneck is going to block UT from anything the administrators want.
With the opening of the med school, the annual operating budget of UT Austin is greater than that of the entire TAMU system. With the money the state has invested in UT Austin, no small minded, redneck **** is going to be allowed to interfere with the interests of UT Austin. If UT administrators wanted UT in the SEC, UT would already be in the SEC.
As someone said earlier, UT already has a branch college in the SEC. That is enough for us.
Randy's response:Quote:
A&M being the lone dissenting vote in a hypothetical Texas-to-SEC invitation does not interfere with UT's interests in any meaningful way, which is why the SEC will let baby have its bottle and vote WAAAAAH NO while the rest of the conference welcomes its new cash cow with open arms, if said hypothetical ever becomes reality.
I'm not sure what you think the SEC could or would do to A&M for casting a stupid vote that doesn't impact an outcome either way, but like so many things with A&M, it's not worth the time to bother trying to convince them not to act like Aggies, so no the SEC is not going to secretly strong-arm A&M into voting either way once Texas' (again, hypothetical) acceptance is numerically guaranteed.
Threatening AAU status, too? How sippy of him. (And FTR: Berdahl, past president at tu was running the AAU when Nebraska was kicked out. Sips could vote any way they wished because Powers knew the vote in advance.)Quote:
I'm not saying the SEC will tell **** how they would vote if UT wanted in. I'm saying the Texas Legislature (actually the Higher Education Subcommittee) would tell **** to shut the $#@! up.
Texas actually supported ****s dream of AAU accreditation. And in return **** is saying they would actively try to $#@! over UT on something as petty as a sports conference affiliation?
If **** really wants to play hardball, I am sure they will get their wish. I'm sure in a tight budget cycle certain interests could find various ways to $#@! over **** and let them instead go to the Alabama or Mississippi legislature for adequate funding.
Making very public statements of their intention to $#@! over another state school if given the opportunity is something **** typically didn't think all the way through.
Obviously, UT's efforts on ****'s behalf when it came to AAU accreditation were a mistake. Hopefully **** can get Nebraskaed in the near future. And, for the record, UT voted in Nebraska's favor during the AAU termination vote. It was the Big 10 schools who voted against them.
That's not true. Randy was one of the first saying Patterson was a disaster and should be fired. Have to give credit to him for that. Blind squirrel still gets to eat when he finds a nut.AlaskanAg99 said:
He's been right on zero topics.
Effin hysterical coming from a Horn.Quote:
**** administrators don't understand they have a fiduciary responsibility to the taxpayers of the state of Texas. ****'s opinion that **** is run for the benefit of their alumni and administrators and they can do as they please is $#@!ing hilarious.
worms have to eat tooaggiehawg said:That's not true. Randy was one of the first saying Patterson was a disaster and should be fired. Have to give credit to him for that. Blind squirrel still gets to eat when he finds a nut.AlaskanAg99 said:
He's been right on zero topics.
