quote:

---

Have we mentioned lately l how this whole deal is based upon a bet white his Michigan "buddy" to prove how obsessed stoooooopidagggyggyyygiigygytgyg really is?

---

quote:

---

Do we need to get a welfare check on Randy?

---

quote:

---

He is kind of starting to feel like our responsibility. Kind of like a sick animal that shows up at your place needing food and water.

---

quote:

---

quote:

---

He is kind of starting to feel like our responsibility. Kind of like a sick animal that shows up at your place needing food and water.

---

I am just hoping that he doesn't emulate that other UT alum, Charles Whitman. I mean I don't know if he is violent, but his level of obsession is extremely unhealthy. Hopefully he doesn't harm others.

---

quote:

---

As I understand it, the university is being given an opportunity to offer an on-the-record response to everything, as part of the vetting process. Once they have responded, or chosen to remain silent, things will move forward.

I am sure they will, yet again, lie through their teeth and show their shameless dishonesty. Unfortunately for them, this time it isn't going to work. But it will offer us a good laugh and serve as more rope for the ags to hang themselves with.

I'm guessing they were contacted today and are collectively $#@!ting their pants at this very moment.

---

quote:

---

**** me, this guy is off his nut.

quote:

---

I love how the ags fabricate stories to make them feel self important and on so smart.



At one time they claimed I was banned from Wikipedia for the edits I was making, but I never was. There was never a basis for banning me from Wikipedia, because everything I was correcting was documented by independent, third party citations. of course, the 'evidence" the ****s were trying to say was more important was always garbage produced by the university. Now this guy claims I have been "laughed off each board" but I haven't been laughed off even one that I am aware of. They claim my effort to expose the truth behind the fraudulent 12th Man story is because my wife had an affair with an ****. Again, not true. They told themselves I was a registered child molester and in prison (I guess they never stopped to think that felons in prison aren't granted unlimited internet access 24 hrs a day). At other times, they have determined after my divorce I was sharing a hovel with a roommate and last I knew I was supposedly sleeping on my sister's couch.



I don't care if it takes an extra day, week or month for the people in charge of this to make sure everything has been vetted and fact checked. This isn't a game of playing "gotcha." This isn't an exercise of proving "my school is better than your school." I am accusing senior TAMU administrators of perpetuating a major fraud, and I am doing it as publicly as I know how. There is a lot at stake here and if high profile people are willing to put their careers and professional reputations at risk based, to any degree, on the research I have done, I am more than content to let them do what they have to do to be assured the conclusions I have drawn are 100% accurate.



That ****s are trying to discredit me, my research and even the fact that my research will, yet again, be used to produce something substantive is no surprise. In the very near future, they are going to be be forced to deal with a harsh, brutal reality. And hopefully senior TAMU administrators, such as John Sharp, will be severely and publicly humiliated, because that is the very least they deserve. If I have my way, the Texas Attorney General will get to weigh in on what else John Sharp and other TAMU administrators deserve.



Today is the 180th anniversary of the beginning of the siege of the Alamo. As I have said many times, not a single one of those men who died at the Alamo did so saying "This will all be worth it if some day, the administrators of a branch college of the state university can fabricate fraudulent stories and convince the public they are true."

---

---

quote:

---

quote:

---

As I understand it, the university is being given an opportunity to offer an on-the-record response to everything, as part of the vetting process. Once they have responded, or chosen to remain silent, things will move forward.

I am sure they will, yet again, lie through their teeth and show their shameless dishonesty. Unfortunately for them, this time it isn't going to work. But it will offer us a good laugh and serve as more rope for the ags to hang themselves with.

I'm guessing they were contacted today and are collectively $#@!ting their pants at this very moment.

---

SOOOO all those lawsuits against the Seahawks, et al. have been decided without any on-the-record response and vetting process?

Or is it that when the vetting process BY ACTUAL COURTS disagree with what this idiot thinks they're just lying? How will it be different this time?

And contacted today by whom?

---

quote:

---

Just be patient. The ag administration is being asked about representations concerning their 12th Man "tradition" they have made in their trademark filing and in their recent federal court pleadings that seemingly are quite problematic.

Basically, read my original 2013 Horn Sports story. People are interested in the subject and burrowing even deeper than I did.

---

quote:

---

I would hate to have to work in the 12th Man Cover-up department tonight (on the 12th-but-not-really floor of Bright). I'm sure they will be spending all night shredding fraud documents before the **** hits the fan.

---

quote:

---

quote:

---

That ****s are trying to discredit me, my research and even the fact that my research will, yet again, be used to produce something substantive is no surprise.

---

Show me ONE TIME where his "research" was used to produce something substantive. JUST ONE.

---

quote:

---

Telco, the TAMU administration will have their opportunity to explain their actions and answer what has to be for them some very uncomfortable questions. In time, their response will be made public. And in time, the TAMU administrators who have been outright lying at every possible opportunity about the school's 12th Man tradition, will be held accountable.

No bull**** "Red Thompson letter," no unsubstantiated fairy tale from 1922 that we find out was a radio play fabricated by the head of the alumni association in the late 1930s. No more **** bull****. Just the truth and accountability. Oh, and restitution of unlawfully obtained trademark licensing revenues for the past 27 years and restitution to the parties the university defrauded in obtaining those revenues.

Maybe at the end of the day, John Sharp and the rest of the ****s will learn a lesson about honesty and integrity. And then maybe **** nation will start taking those values seriously.

---

quote:

---

slander

slandr/
noun
LAW

[ol]

1.
the action or crime of making a false spoken statement damaging to a person's reputation.
"he is suing the TV network for slander"

• 
  verb
  
  [ol]
  
• 1.
  make false and damaging statements about (someone).
  "they were accused of slandering the head of state"
  synonyms:
  defame (someone's character), blacken someone's name, tell lies about, speak ill/evil of,sully someone's reputation, libel, smear, cast aspersions on, spread scandal about, besmirch,tarnish, taint; More
[/ol]

[/ol]

---

quote:

---

restitution of unlawfully obtained trademark licensing revenues for the past 27 years and restitution to the parties the university defrauded in obtaining those revenues.

---

quote:

---

quote:

---

quote:

---

What is he hoping to accomplish? I do not see any way that this ends in public shaming of university employees and exposing of additional fraudulent activity by state employees. This makes no sense outside of mere obsession with a school that he has resentment toward.

---

An Aggie started banging his wife and eventually she left him for that Aggie. Draw what conclusion that you will, but to me it means that Mr. Duke has a tiny peen.

---

Based on the poster a few pages back that claims to know him, this isn't true.

---

quote:

---

Duke apparently spent 130 pages and untold hours arguing a point that was ultimately rejected and is no longer part of the article. But don't worry Randolph... there will always be a new windmill on down the road!

---