Business & Investing
Sponsored by

Stock Markets

25,850,361 Views | 235258 Replies | Last: 53 min ago by RoyVal
Diggity
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who knows. I bought some last year and it's down 7% so SGOV sounds great compared to that.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Seems like the price is more stable for SGOV.
Trump will fix it.
EliteZags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Diggity said:

it's down 7%

think that's part of the reasoning
Diggity
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Think that was part of the reasoning when I bought it too. Hasn't worked out so far.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EliteZags said:

Saw something on shifting from SGOV to TLT, thoughts?

Just been keeping sidelined investing cash in Webull/Robinhood in SGOV usually low 5 figures
I've advised TLT on here for a while. I have 30% of my cash in it as of today. It's certainly gotten deeper and taken to longer to bottom than I would prefer, but the setup is there for the dollar to drop and bonds to rise.
EliteZags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
yea so is the premise earning interest/dividends on cash positions with some added potential for price appreciation

not cash needed for upcoming downpayments or anything, just sidelined reserves for dip buying, which is it somewhat resistant from broad market pullbacks
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EliteZags said:

yea so is the premise earning interest/dividends on cash positions with some added potential for price appreciation

not cash needed for upcoming downpayments or anything, just sidelined reserves for dip buying, which is it somewhat resistant from broad market pullbacks
For me, it was being able to see the market stretching to levels of extreme sentiment, while at the same time watching the dollar rise in a pattern that is expected to terminate below the last high from 2022, while watching interest follow a similar path to the dollar. I was willing to buy TLT's in the lower $90's expecting a move to $105 and possibly even higher toward $110-$120 over the next year. My base expectation was for a period of considerable volatility in equities on the horizon during a period where TLT would be rising and rates and the dollar would be falling. The interest/dividend played no part, merely the moderate price increase (which would actually be a solid return now that it's in the low $80's) for a portion of my money that usually just sits idle in my account.

If my expectation turns to reality, please know that the next phase would be a bottoming of the dollar and interest rates, and top in TLT, that would reverse and send rates and the dollar to new highs over the coming years and TLT to new lows, eventually leading to a potential bond market crash.



It all seems inevitable, and we've seen a variation of this before in the 1970's and 80's. We thought we were smarter and better, but it appears we are not. The current regime of fiscal dominance



is a feedback loop that is unavoidable barring a new uber hawk fed chair who raises short term rates to drastic levels, crushing the economy and market in the process, to attempt to end this spiraling cycle sooner. The ONLY solution the current leadership has is as predictable as it can be. They monetize the debt and play games month to month while the train goes on. Lyn lays it all out here. Full Steam Ahead: All Aboard Fiscal Dominance - Lyn Alden

The only thing that would have me pivot is if long term rates exploded higher sooner. And the loss I'll take on TLT by getting stopped out is negligible to me since it's money that wasn't in the market, which would be crashing much harder. I view it is the safest potential loss right now, until which time where cash is the only option.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you look at SPX and the 10-year yield, I keep wondering if we're somewhere in the 1960's or 70's right now. Where bond yields initially rise strongly following a period of extreme easing. This time period was treacherous for stocks and the economy. Inflation went from picking up, to roaoring, to embedded, to needing extreme hawkish measures to get under control. Every new high in the market was followed by drastic volatile drops. From the 1973 top, it was a decade before the market was back above that top permanently. Try to imagine merely being a buy and hold investor, or a DCA investor, over those 10-15 years. Even with the fiscal dominance feeding assets, the majority of people invested had a completely neutral at best decade of wealth growth. Many were crushed. A portfolio exclusively invested in the S&P at the end of the year in 1979 was at that exact same place it was in 1969, 1973, and 1976.



Not saying this is what is going to happen. But it's the "most" similar time in observable financial history. If you aren't prepared for sweeping volatility that can switch from bull to bear back and forth multiple times over the next 1-2 decades, I think you are doing yourself a disservice. Because as I've mentioned many times, our economic starting point leading into this similar looking scenario is much much worse than the 1960's were seeing as we're beyond war time levels of debt/gdp and we haven't even started the emergency actions phase yet.

This is why I am very long metals, why I have Bitcoin exposure directly (Blackrock holding BTC is not you owning it), and why I'm willing to take profits on stocks when I feel sentiment has reached an extreme. You can win in volatile time periods while the majority are whipsawing back and forth. But it requires a change of philosophy from everything you have been trained to do since 2008, which is to merely buy and hold long term. And if the wrost case comes true, which would be cataclysmic 1929 style crash and depression, it will be MUCH longer than 1-2 decades before your money is anywhere close to where it is today.
giddings_ag_06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not to be insensitive or anything, but is HD a buy with all these fires going on and after the dip they just took?
Charismatic Megafauna
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Insensitive how? Thread is dead today
bhanacik
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I bought a put for HD yesterday as I'm not seeing a lot of support for where it's at right now. I went with a couple weeks out and just out of money if memory serves.
BucketofBalls99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anyone in AVGO? Just curious on the support and resistance
gigemJTH12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Towns03 said:

WWR

just $78 (of $11,500) away from break even.
has OA commented on this?

I still own all my shares
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bhanacik said:

I bought a put for HD yesterday as I'm not seeing a lot of support for where it's at right now. I went with a couple weeks out and just out of money if memory serves.
I've got HD support at $375 and then $350. Lose those, $325 becomes critical, and if it holds, should lead to the first multi-month bounce. My default though is that the top is in long-term on HD. I could see a scenario where there's one more high, but I don't think it comes from here, likely between $325 and $350.

If you are long or interested in HD, this chart needs to be your bible. This is the trend from $17 in 2008 through present which recently peaked at $439.37. Take a look at MACD. It's absolutely going to at least get back to the zero line and is in a full sell on weekly. You better hope it does so above the lower channel boundary.



Because it's sitting on the 34 week EMA, and if it drops below there with follow through below the channel, it has a LONG way to fall. $140 was the COVID bottom and $250 the top prior to it.

El_duderino
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Amazing and concerning seeing the lack of volume above compared to the high volume node down around $41 and below.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zooming in on HD, it looks like a completed ending diagonal to me. And if so, $265 is absolutely going to hit, though there will be a bounce before it does. My guess is this taps the lower trendline, bounces for a little while back to near $400 forming a H&S, and then ultimately fails downward.

Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El_duderino said:

Amazing and concerning seeing the lack of volume above compared to the high volume node down around $41 and below.
Yes, but grain of salt there. A lot of shares can move at $17 and volume naturally declines as a stock aggressively moves up and accumulating sizeable positions gets costly, especially $400+ dollars up.

That's another piece though. At higher and higher prices, retail gets priced out. Everyone who has built wealth with this did so around the GFC $17 bottom and slightly higher levels as it moved up. From there, it's likely mostly been lower levels of accumulation around pivotal moments like COVID and 2022 bottom, but prices were much more expensive. So it was likely mostly pensions, hedge funds, and broad retirement accounts with more of a DCA attitude. And as price moves down, the hedges will be the first to exit, followed by the pensions, and lastly the retirement accounts at much lower levels. Retail is likely a tiny tiny driver from this point forward.

Nobody wants to see big green profits wiped out, and the first to be protected will be the 2022 bottom accumulators. Many might already even be out leaving retail holding the bag. The next profits to be protected will be the COVID purchasers which is why that level is likely a magnet and will lead to some sort of bounce if not a generational buying opportunity.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Last chart on HD, because I don't want to mislead. MACD is turned up on hourly candles, so a bounce could be happening. I would just advise caution and prudent risk management. The last time 12hr MAC got this low, the bounce was anything but fun and would have taken significant patience to endure before it paid off. If new highs are in store, then it's likely simply one more marginal high in this ending diagonal, maybe around $470 (which is nice gains from here).

MACD can get embedded during trends. You could have a nice swing back up in MACD where price really doesn't move very far. You could also have a swing up that has price go lower creating a positive divergence evnironment that is pointing to a further in time bounce on the horizon. But that can last a long time and can also fail if MACD makes a new low. So I simply say, if you are going long, please understand where this can fail. The future for HD is a massive correction. Just a matter if its readying now, or it wants one more high.

Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Heineken-Ashi said:

BTC - almost like I've seen this pattern before..


$87k and I'm buying with force.
BucketofBalls99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BTC only? Or would IBIT fall into that play as well?
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BucketofBalls99 said:

BTC only? Or would IBIT fall into that play as well?
Sure, it mirros BTC minus the fees.
zgolfz85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ionq spiking overnight. Hopefully a sign of things to come for quantum
EliteZags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
anyone entering AMD <120 here
RoyVal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EliteZags said:

anyone entering AMD <120 here
AMD might have a tough 2025. They are so far behind in AI and doing a horrible job of executing right now. Unfortunately I'm still holding and down right now, but selling monthly calls to help dig out of the hole. I'm hoping it can hold and even recover a little bit in the next 3-6 months. I just need them to grab a little bit of market share to show some growth and hopefully the stock moves for me
First Page Refresh
Page 6722 of 6722
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.