Business & Investing
Sponsored by

Stock Markets

24,910,127 Views | 233672 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by BlueTaze
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Took some more profit on SMCI (48.95) and SOXL (39.95).

Nearest target for TNA is 45.75.

Also gonna start grabbing some SSO for a long-term hold in my Roth account, as I start slowly lowering my SMCI exposure. Current buy targets are set at 88, 86, 80, 76.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thomas Powell has sold $29,515,040 in stock this year. $14,820,820 has come in the last 2-3 months. 6 of the 8 sales that grossed him over $1M have come in the last 2-3 months.

He has 682,265 shares directly remaining and 1,634,779 shares indirectly.

There were no insider buys between March and October of this year, with October having a little over $1M in insider buys, none of them Mr Powell. The overwhelming majority of insider moves this year have been sales.

This info doesn't have to mean anything. The man retired from the board in 2022, built an amazing company, is an AGGIE and distinguished alumni, and has killed it. I am very happy for him.

Maybe he can sponsor the B&I board.

On POWL - it obviously continues to invalidate every bearish setup. Impressive run. I have a price target of $350 next year, though I expect a large swing down before it gets there. If you see $200 again, buy it. Congrats to ProgN as well for calling attention here and making a bunch of people money.
09Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Heineken, do you still like LUV? It's been running counter to the other airlines the last week.
I bleed maroon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Heineken-Ashi said:

Thomas Powell has sold $29,515,040 in stock this year. $14,820,820 has come in the last 2-3 months. 6 of the 8 sales that grossed him over $1M have come in the last 2-3 months.

He has 682,265 shares directly remaining and 1,634,779 shares indirectly.

There were no insider buys between March and October of this year, with October having a little over $1M in insider buys, none of them Mr Powell. The overwhelming majority of insider moves this year have been sales.

This info doesn't have to mean anything. The man retired from the board in 2022, built an amazing company, is an AGGIE and distinguished alumni, and has killed it. I am very happy for him.

Maybe he can sponsor the B&I board.

On POWL - it obviously continues to invalidate every bearish setup. Impressive run. I have a price target of $350 next year, though I expect a large swing down before it gets there. If you see $200 again, buy it. Congrats to ProgN as well for calling attention here and making a bunch of people money.
Speaking of which, have you ever seen Mr. Powell and Mr. ProgN together in the same room? Just sayin'...
Marauder Blue 6
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
09Ag said:

Heineken, do you still like LUV? It's been running counter to the other airlines the last week.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/elliott-requests-special-meeting-southwest-123348286.html
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
09Ag said:

Heineken, do you still like LUV? It's been running counter to the other airlines the last week.
It was a chart setup, and I still like it. Might be willing to let stop go to $26 from $28. But I still see $40-$45 potential as a greater probability than a bearish move to new lows. That said, below $26 would remove alot of my upward bias.
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
VXX - parameters are clear. Hold the red line, and volatility can be bullish. Measured move targets and timing are standard application EW. Volatility WILL NOT spread out like this. The point is to show the general levels of what a bullish volatility move would project to. To be extra clear, DO NOT ASSUME ANY TIMING FROM THIS CHART. See the Aug 5th ramp up for example #1 as to how quick this thing can move.

Like I said, parameters are clear. Hold the red line, bull setup is there to be had. Break the red line, equities bull market keeps kicking. Below $39 and volatility is completely reset.

techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EnronAg said:

bulls are just stampeding this thing...and just rubbing it in at this point...what stocks aren't in rocket mode is the bigger question...
BA.
giddings_ag_06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Richest man in Giddings
Agsrback12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Can anybody offer thoughts on Black Rifle Coffee Company? Ticker BRCC
permabull
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bro in CNBC calling 6000 by end of year, 6300 early next year and 6500 sometime next year ... Guy is a bigger bull than me

Edit: john kolovos
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Shorting this market...


harge57
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agsrback12 said:

Can anybody offer thoughts on Black Rifle Coffee Company? Ticker BRCC


I wouldn't touch it. Their brick and mortar strategy is a recipe for failure imo.

Revenue is declining, makes no profit., TONS of debt. I think it will be bankrupt or sold off for brand value in the next 3 years.
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Copied this data from reddit for those who might think we're overvalued...

When adjusted for inflation the SP500 is only 7% higher than 2021.

Forward PE in 2021 hit 38.6

Forward PE today is 22.87
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brian Earl Spilner said:

Copied this data from reddit for those who might think we're overvalued...

When adjusted for inflation the SP500 is only 7% higher than 2021.

Forward PE in 2021 hit 38.6

Forward PE today is 22.87
During inflationary periods, P/E's are usually lower. Inflation costs are passed on to customers. Earnings rise faster than stock prices. Higher earnings and lower stock price = lower P/E.
permabull
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think there is still a lot of money on the sidelines (i.e. all the lump sum threads on this board). After 2022 lots of people were waiting for the other shoe to drop, many called tops at 4250 and again at 5000... Lots of people still looking for an entry point so I wouldn't be surprised if every dip is bought up.
EliteZags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BTC is either going to breakout soon and run like crazy, or the triangle is back baby for one more go directly into an election bottom.

Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Below is one of my long-winded write ups. If you don't care about Elliott Wave or learning a strategy I've employed countless times, go ahead and skip.
--------------------------------

It's not always easy identifying good setups before they take off. That's why FOMO is so strong amongst retail investors. At best, they have about a 20% hit rate on knife catches and essentially get lucky. At worst, they simply never find stocks, much less buy them, in the early stages of a buildup prior to breakout. Usually limited to the names they know, or ideas that others provide (no problem with that at all BTW), they almost exclusively act too late, or flat out miss. I've been one of those. And sometimes, I still am.. because trading and investing is hard if you're trying to outpace the market. Believe it or not, the S&P doesn't always outpace your day job. And often times, you will end a year scratching your head.

This is one of the best use cases for Elliott Wave. The goal is to find a 5-wave setup that then retraces down to a higher low support zone. From there, you know you have a potential first wave of a larger structure in place, and you can place your stop immediately below it to limit risk. You can also wait for a 5-wave structure to form within the buildup under the high point of the preceding 5-wave structure. This is what we call nested bullish waves. Since the odd numbered waves in a 5-wave move break down themselves into 5-wave structures, the best confirmation of a budding explosive breakout is that nested smaller structure under the high of the larger structure.

A 5-wave structure is nothing more than price moving from either an exhausted bearish state, or a consolidation state. The non-overlapping nature shows bulls continually beating bears as it moves up. Once it tops, bears try to bring it back down, but bulls ultimately hold in a 2nd wave bottom showing that there just isn't enough bearish left to take it any lower. That's why it's a phenomenal indicator. It tells you when sentiment is gaining and when it is exhausting.

Below is a stock I found just perusing some random lists. I know nothing about the company. It IPO'd in the low $20's, had a very short stint up before bears creamed the **** out of it for 2 years. They eventually exhausted themselves at $1.21. I bet you could look up news from September 2023 on the company, the industry, the sector, and the broader market, and find no reason to put your money in this POS. Yet within 5 months it was back to nearly $7 and within a year it was back over $9. Bears got another chance and brought it back to $2.18. Sentiment was probably more negative than ever. Yet, again, it reversed back upward.

Is this confirmed bullish? No. But if you look at the structure of the move off the September 2023 low, you see 5 very clear waves that become the "potential" larger Wave 1. Using the recent low as the "potential" Wave 2, I can now use the Fibonacci Extension tool to project the "potential" next levels. For this to confirm, it has some build up left. I want to see a 5-wave structure into the 61.8% $7.61 level or even higher into the 76.4% $10.22 level. After that, I expect another retrace that catches another higher low. At that point, it's just a matter of time before it bust upward.

But given where the stop levels would be, it's a price right now that provides pretty limited risk and could allow me to form a starter position. So I would buy tomorrow with my stop at $2.18. I would then buy at key levels, accumulating shares (and maybe removing some risk along the way if I can get some doubles) under the previous high of $9.14. Eventually, I hope to have a limited risk position set to capitalize on the "potential" bullish structure ahead, where I would go completely net free at the first target of $16.50 area around the 100% fib extension level, moving my stop to the 61.8% $7.61 area.



And during the accumulation phase, I let my stop work. If I get stopped, it's because the setup likely broke. So I trash the name and forget about it. But what if it doesn't engage a larger 5-wave move, yet doesn't get stopped? Well I have my alternate, which shows that what I labeled as the "potential" Wave (1) was actually just an (A) wave in an upward correction. If that's the case, I have my stop to limit my risk, and I still have the 100% target for the (C) wave, and worst case, I can play for the previous high of $9.14.



All of this analysis happens right now. The parameters are set and I don't have to second guess anything. I will track the progress as time goes by and adjust if something materially changes. I don't worry about the many other potentials that the market might do, or what the fundamentals will do. The parameters I've set protect me from significant loss and set me up for potential success. My money is aligned with something that is structured to build up, break out, and profit immensely.
aggies4life
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
El Chupacabra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WOLF!

GKrebs17
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm in.
fauxstradamus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Heineken-Ashi said:

BTC is either going to breakout soon and run like crazy, or the triangle is back baby for one more go directly into an election bottom.


I've read other places that $66200 is a resistance zone. What's your take on resistance that it would need to break through for a true bull run?
valvemonkey91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Heineken-Ashi said:

Below is one of my long-winded write ups. If you don't care about Elliott Wave or learning a strategy I've employed countless times, go ahead and skip.
--------------------------------

It's not always easy identifying good setups before they take off. That's why FOMO is so strong amongst retail investors. At best, they have about a 20% hit rate on knife catches and essentially get lucky. At worst, they simply never find stocks, much less buy them, in the early stages of a buildup prior to breakout. Usually limited to the names they know, or ideas that others provide (no problem with that at all BTW), they almost exclusively act too late, or flat out miss. I've been one of those. And sometimes, I still am.. because trading and investing is hard if you're trying to outpace the market. Believe it or not, the S&P doesn't always outpace your day job. And often times, you will end a year scratching your head.

This is one of the best use cases for Elliott Wave. The goal is to find a 5-wave setup that then retraces down to a higher low support zone. From there, you know you have a potential first wave of a larger structure in place, and you can place your stop immediately below it to limit risk. You can also wait for a 5-wave structure to form within the buildup under the high point of the preceding 5-wave structure. This is what we call nested bullish waves. Since the odd numbered waves in a 5-wave move break down themselves into 5-wave structures, the best confirmation of a budding explosive breakout is that nested smaller structure under the high of the larger structure.

A 5-wave structure is nothing more than price moving from either an exhausted bearish state, or a consolidation state. The non-overlapping nature shows bulls continually beating bears as it moves up. Once it tops, bears try to bring it back down, but bulls ultimately hold in a 2nd wave bottom showing that there just isn't enough bearish left to take it any lower. That's why it's a phenomenal indicator. It tells you when sentiment is gaining and when it is exhausting.

Below is a stock I found just perusing some random lists. I know nothing about the company. It IPO'd in the low $20's, had a very short stint up before bears creamed the **** out of it for 2 years. They eventually exhausted themselves at $1.21. I bet you could look up news from September 2023 on the company, the industry, the sector, and the broader market, and find no reason to put your money in this POS. Yet within 5 months it was back to nearly $7 and within a year it was back over $9. Bears got another chance and brought it back to $2.18. Sentiment was probably more negative than ever. Yet, again, it reversed back upward.

Is this confirmed bullish? No. But if you look at the structure of the move off the September 2023 low, you see 5 very clear waves that become the "potential" larger Wave 1. Using the recent low as the "potential" Wave 2, I can now use the Fibonacci Extension tool to project the "potential" next levels. For this to confirm, it has some build up left. I want to see a 5-wave structure into the 61.8% $7.61 level or even higher into the 76.4% $10.22 level. After that, I expect another retrace that catches another higher low. At that point, it's just a matter of time before it bust upward.

But given where the stop levels would be, it's a price right now that provides pretty limited risk and could allow me to form a starter position. So I would buy tomorrow with my stop at $2.18. I would then buy at key levels, accumulating shares (and maybe removing some risk along the way if I can get some doubles) under the previous high of $9.14. Eventually, I hope to have a limited risk position set to capitalize on the "potential" bullish structure ahead, where I would go completely net free at the first target of $16.50 area around the 100% fib extension level, moving my stop to the 61.8% $7.61 area.



And during the accumulation phase, I let my stop work. If I get stopped, it's because the setup likely broke. So I trash the name and forget about it. But what if it doesn't engage a larger 5-wave move, yet doesn't get stopped? Well I have my alternate, which shows that what I labeled as the "potential" Wave (1) was actually just an (A) wave in an upward correction. If that's the case, I have my stop to limit my risk, and I still have the 100% target for the (C) wave, and worst case, I can play for the previous high of $9.14.



All of this analysis happens right now. The parameters are set and I don't have to second guess anything. I will track the progress as time goes by and adjust if something materially changes. I don't worry about the many other potentials that the market might do, or what the fundamentals will do. The parameters I've set protect me from significant loss and set me up for potential success. My money is aligned with something that is structured to build up, break out, and profit immensely.


I've been reading your posts and thanks for what you do here. I'm not a trader. Mostly buy and hold. Could you explain how you accumulate to your desired position? How to you buy these stocks? 100 shares at a time? 10 shares? How do you enter a position like this? I understand the stop loss, but how do you determine what your initial buy is?
Imsodopey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WOLF UP 28% - $750 million in funding from CHIPS and Science Act
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Something just spooked the market.
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Any thoughts on VLO?
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Brian Earl Spilner said:

Something just spooked the market.
It is overextended and needs a backtest.

Semis are getting nailed because the fed is looking at capping exports for national security reasons.

I took NVDA for a sizable profit on a short and ended up leaving a bit on the table. This is where having the short term memory helps me not think about it so much
deddog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gaeilge said:

Brian Earl Spilner said:

Something just spooked the market.
It is overextended and needs a backtest.

Semis are getting nailed because the fed is looking at capping exports for national security reasons.

I took NVDA for a sizable profit on a short and ended up leaving a bit on the table. This is where having the short term memory helps me not think about it so much
This is such a stupid solution, typical bureaucratic insanity
Brian Earl Spilner
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fantastic swing trade opportunities today. Took TNA profit at 45.75, and grabbed the dip on SOXL (37.30) and SMCI (45.85).
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fauxstradamus said:

Heineken-Ashi said:

BTC is either going to breakout soon and run like crazy, or the triangle is back baby for one more go directly into an election bottom.


I've read other places that $66200 is a resistance zone. What's your take on resistance that it would need to break through for a true bull run?
ATH is the only sure fire signal. But by then, you've missed a lot of the move. For me, it's $70k as that breaks above the upper, lower high trendline. I would want to see confirmed close above that line and then use it as support and never fall back below.
tysker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Heineken-Ashi said:

Below is one of my long-winded write ups. If you don't care about Elliott Wave or learning a strategy I've employed countless times, go ahead and skip.
--------------------------------

It's not always easy identifying good setups before they take off. That's why FOMO is so strong amongst retail investors. At best, they have about a 20% hit rate on knife catches and essentially get lucky. At worst, they simply never find stocks, much less buy them, in the early stages of a buildup prior to breakout. Usually limited to the names they know, or ideas that others provide (no problem with that at all BTW), they almost exclusively act too late, or flat out miss. I've been one of those. And sometimes, I still am.. because trading and investing is hard if you're trying to outpace the market. Believe it or not, the S&P doesn't always outpace your day job. And often times, you will end a year scratching your head.

This is one of the best use cases for Elliott Wave. The goal is to find a 5-wave setup that then retraces down to a higher low support zone. From there, you know you have a potential first wave of a larger structure in place, and you can place your stop immediately below it to limit risk. You can also wait for a 5-wave structure to form within the buildup under the high point of the preceding 5-wave structure. This is what we call nested bullish waves. Since the odd numbered waves in a 5-wave move break down themselves into 5-wave structures, the best confirmation of a budding explosive breakout is that nested smaller structure under the high of the larger structure.

A 5-wave structure is nothing more than price moving from either an exhausted bearish state, or a consolidation state. The non-overlapping nature shows bulls continually beating bears as it moves up. Once it tops, bears try to bring it back down, but bulls ultimately hold in a 2nd wave bottom showing that there just isn't enough bearish left to take it any lower. That's why it's a phenomenal indicator. It tells you when sentiment is gaining and when it is exhausting.

Below is a stock I found just perusing some random lists. I know nothing about the company. It IPO'd in the low $20's, had a very short stint up before bears creamed the **** out of it for 2 years. They eventually exhausted themselves at $1.21. I bet you could look up news from September 2023 on the company, the industry, the sector, and the broader market, and find no reason to put your money in this POS. Yet within 5 months it was back to nearly $7 and within a year it was back over $9. Bears got another chance and brought it back to $2.18. Sentiment was probably more negative than ever. Yet, again, it reversed back upward.

Is this confirmed bullish? No. But if you look at the structure of the move off the September 2023 low, you see 5 very clear waves that become the "potential" larger Wave 1. Using the recent low as the "potential" Wave 2, I can now use the Fibonacci Extension tool to project the "potential" next levels. For this to confirm, it has some build up left. I want to see a 5-wave structure into the 61.8% $7.61 level or even higher into the 76.4% $10.22 level. After that, I expect another retrace that catches another higher low. At that point, it's just a matter of time before it bust upward.

But given where the stop levels would be, it's a price right now that provides pretty limited risk and could allow me to form a starter position. So I would buy tomorrow with my stop at $2.18. I would then buy at key levels, accumulating shares (and maybe removing some risk along the way if I can get some doubles) under the previous high of $9.14. Eventually, I hope to have a limited risk position set to capitalize on the "potential" bullish structure ahead, where I would go completely net free at the first target of $16.50 area around the 100% fib extension level, moving my stop to the 61.8% $7.61 area.



And during the accumulation phase, I let my stop work. If I get stopped, it's because the setup likely broke. So I trash the name and forget about it. But what if it doesn't engage a larger 5-wave move, yet doesn't get stopped? Well I have my alternate, which shows that what I labeled as the "potential" Wave (1) was actually just an (A) wave in an upward correction. If that's the case, I have my stop to limit my risk, and I still have the 100% target for the (C) wave, and worst case, I can play for the previous high of $9.14.



All of this analysis happens right now. The parameters are set and I don't have to second guess anything. I will track the progress as time goes by and adjust if something materially changes. I don't worry about the many other potentials that the market might do, or what the fundamentals will do. The parameters I've set protect me from significant loss and set me up for potential success. My money is aligned with something that is structured to build up, break out, and profit immensely.
It's always interesting to see the difference between technical and fundamental analysis.
A cursory look at recent SEC filings, not including financials:
  • The company recently completed a secondary offering of 8 million shares at $4.00 per share.
  • Over 70% of the outstanding shares are now held by Sycamore Partners, a private equity firm. Before the offering, Sycamore held about 78%.
  • The Chief Creative Officer and EVP, who was previously the CEO and President, was just terminated (not leaving for personal reasons). They held a 2% stake in the company.
  • As part of the secondary offering, Sycamore, the terminated CCO/EVP, and the current CEO both liquidated about 9% of their personal holdings.
  • Other sellers included Anne Stephenson and Michael Salmon, both of whom have notable experience in fast fashion brands.

The company operates in the fashion industry, which can be quite unpredictable with customer trends and the tendency of investors to jump on and off the bandwagon. It's pretty common for companies in this space, especially those backed by private equity, to see their value decline over time.


eta: CURV's Chief Human Resources Officer, Chief Legal Officer had similar role for Tuesday Morning, helping guide that company into BK. And the CFO, prior to working at Torrid, "made significant contributions at Mattress Firm" another company in BK
Heineken-Ashi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So for this one, since it's cheap, I would start with 200-400 shares. I would then sell half at 2x as the stock is likely still in the build up phase at that price point. If you have less than 100 shares, and you want to sell some if it moves higher to remove risk, you are left with less than enough shares to ever be able to sell covered calls on. So I make sure any risk management or position maneuvering in the future could leave me with 100 shares. The goal is to have a completely risk free holding before the previous top is hit.

Now this one is tricky on a granular level, since the stop is a pretty large loss %. That's why I'm only doing a starter position. 58% stop loss risk as of right now. But 58% of a 200 shares position is $436, which isn't much in the grand scheme of my account. If I bought 1000 shares, 58% is a $2k loss. I'm not willing to stomach that risk. So I buy 200 shares knowing that worst case scenario I lose $436.

The best time to accumulate is after this smaller degree Wave 1 completes and the subsequent Wave 2 retraces and holds the higher low. At THAT point, you can apply your stop at a much higher level with much more limited risk.

You do not have to buy in now. This has a lot of work to do and is risky from stop% at this point. But there's incredible reward should you buy here, $2.18 hold, and this go to $7-$10 over coming months. It's all about your personal risk management.

My strategy is 200 shares now, sell half at 2x. Then once a Wave 1 and Wave 2 are in place, I will buy 900 to round out a 1,000 share position with my stop below the Wave 2. My first 100 shares would be net free. The new 900 would ideally have a 10% or less stop loss risk. And at that point, I know the next target is another ~2x where I can sell 400-500 and get completely net free, leaving the rest to ride.

valvemonkey91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Heineken-Ashi said:

So for this one, since it's cheap, I would start with 200-400 shares. I would then sell half at 2x as the stock is likely still in the build up phase at that price point. If you have less than 100 shares, and you want to sell some if it moves higher to remove risk, you are left with less than enough shares to ever be able to sell covered calls on. So I make sure any risk management or position maneuvering in the future could leave me with 100 shares. The goal is to have a completely risk free holding before the previous top is hit.

Now this one is tricky on a granular level, since the stop is a pretty large loss %. That's why I'm only doing a starter position. 58% stop loss risk as of right now. But 58% of a 200 shares position is $436, which isn't much in the grand scheme of my account. If I bought 1000 shares, 58% is a $2k loss. I'm not willing to stomach that risk. So I buy 200 shares knowing that worst case scenario I lose $436.

The best time to accumulate is after this smaller degree Wave 1 completes and the subsequent Wave 2 retraces and holds the higher low. At THAT point, you can apply your stop at a much higher level with much more limited risk.

You do not have to buy in now. This has a lot of work to do and is risky from stop% at this point. But there's incredible reward should you buy here, $2.18 hold, and this go to $7-$10 over coming months. It's all about your personal risk management.

My strategy is 200 shares now, sell half at 2x. Then once a Wave 1 and Wave 2 are in place, I will buy 900 to round out a 1,000 share position with my stop below the Wave 2. My first 100 shares would be net free. The new 900 would ideally have a 10% or less stop loss risk. And at that point, I know the next target is another ~2x where I can sell 400-500 and get completely net free, leaving the rest to ride.





Thx. Almost like my blackjack strategy.
Bob Knights Paper Hands
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good grief, I was leveraged long on TQQQ and closed out in the first 30 minutes this morning. Rather be lucky than good. I meant to close yesterday but got busy. I think we'll see volatility continue to tick up as the election gets closer. Lots of small gains or losses and sitting on my hands for the next few weeks.
First Page Last Page
Page 6637 of 6677
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.