exactly what I was thinking when reading up on itBob Knights Liver said:BaylorSpineGuy said:Cassava Sciences faces U.S. criminal probe tied to Alzheimer's drug, sources say $SAVA
— *Walter Bloomberg (@DeItaone) July 27, 2022
SAVA at $15 right now. Down 30%.
This is about the investigation that started August 2021, after the complaints of two doctors working with shorts. It's still a very risky investment, but they've allowed Ph2 & 3 trials to continue while this investigation has officially been open. This feels like another hit piece to me.
This. If you like SAVA at $14 you'll love it even more at $4.Ranger222 said:
a criminal probe is another hit piece???
This goes way beyond SAVA now --
https://www.science.org/content/article/potential-fabrication-research-images-threatens-key-theory-alzheimers-disease
Ranger222 said:
a criminal probe is another hit piece???
This goes way beyond SAVA now --
https://www.science.org/content/article/potential-fabrication-research-images-threatens-key-theory-alzheimers-disease
If you believe it's going to $4, you should short sell as much as you can at $16 todayDr. Alister MacKenzie said:This. If you like SAVA at $14 you'll love it even more at $4.Ranger222 said:
a criminal probe is another hit piece???
This goes way beyond SAVA now --
https://www.science.org/content/article/potential-fabrication-research-images-threatens-key-theory-alzheimers-disease
Do you believe/think/feel/whatever, that SAVA is manipulating data? I'm curious what your stance is.Ranger222 said:
a criminal probe is another hit piece???
This goes way beyond SAVA now --
https://www.science.org/content/article/potential-fabrication-research-images-threatens-key-theory-alzheimers-disease
I don't read the article as SAVA has done anything wrong.Farmer @ Johnsongrass, TX said:Do you believe/think/feel/whatever, that SAVA is manipulating data? I'm curious what your stance is.Ranger222 said:
a criminal probe is another hit piece???
This goes way beyond SAVA now --
https://www.science.org/content/article/potential-fabrication-research-images-threatens-key-theory-alzheimers-disease
As for me, I read the article. ...... I'm not a doctor. From what I read, Schrag is trying hard, but are his efforts to preserve science or eliminate competition? There are disputes over the same data where one party claims it's legit and the other party claims it's not legit. I think this play under review in the booth will rule in favor of SAVA because of indisputable proof not being present. The "proof" of images being manipulated or not-manipulated has support from both party's meaning it's disputable. And, since it's not indisputable to overturn the call (on-going FDA Phase Tests) on the field, SAVA continues. Yeah, mixed in some football, because lots of offense and defense going on in this medical investigation. My simple mind..
SAVAs drug doesn't target plaques directly like other AD drugs on the market. SAVA claims their drug corrects for a misfolded protein in the brain, which they believe causes AD.FTAG 2000 said:I don't read the article as SAVA has done anything wrong.Farmer @ Johnsongrass, TX said:Do you believe/think/feel/whatever, that SAVA is manipulating data? I'm curious what your stance is.Ranger222 said:
a criminal probe is another hit piece???
This goes way beyond SAVA now --
https://www.science.org/content/article/potential-fabrication-research-images-threatens-key-theory-alzheimers-disease
As for me, I read the article. ...... I'm not a doctor. From what I read, Schrag is trying hard, but are his efforts to preserve science or eliminate competition? There are disputes over the same data where one party claims it's legit and the other party claims it's not legit. I think this play under review in the booth will rule in favor of SAVA because of indisputable proof not being present. The "proof" of images being manipulated or not-manipulated has support from both party's meaning it's disputable. And, since it's not indisputable to overturn the call (on-going FDA Phase Tests) on the field, SAVA continues. Yeah, mixed in some football, because lots of offense and defense going on in this medical investigation. My simple mind..
If the allegations are proven true, they are saying the entire premise of the protein causing Alzheimer's is illegitimate.
Given that's what SAVA has targeted and put all their work into, that would be a problem for them if found credible.
Now, their drug could still work, but if this theory is thrown in the trash by the NIH then it's absolutely going to have a negative impact on Cassava.
Called that nicely. AAPL looking to challenge 154 potentially here.$30,000 Millionaire said:
Don't worry, there will be sell today.
topher06 said:
Maybe shouldn't have sold those calls on the AMZN shares I bought. Oh well, still a nice 7% scalp in 3 days if they get called out at $120.
Yeah in hindsight I definitely should have done this, but obviously that's an easy call in hindsight. Still it was just cash I would have otherwise had lying around so a 7% return on it is helpful and much better than 0% (or 0.02% or whatever pathetically low interest banks pay now).Lake08 said:topher06 said:
Maybe shouldn't have sold those calls on the AMZN shares I bought. Oh well, still a nice 7% scalp in 3 days if they get called out at $120.
I am waiting to sell my calls after the fed. Even for two days before expiration, the premium is very juicy.
topher06 said:Yeah in hindsight I definitely should have done this, but obviously that's an easy call in hindsight. Still it was just cash I would have otherwise had lying around so a 7% return on it is helpful and much better than 0% (or 0.02% or whatever pathetically low interest banks pay now).Lake08 said:topher06 said:
Maybe shouldn't have sold those calls on the AMZN shares I bought. Oh well, still a nice 7% scalp in 3 days if they get called out at $120.
I am waiting to sell my calls after the fed. Even for two days before expiration, the premium is very juicy.
Glad for you and others who haven't sold CC yet.
I have been following this issue as well.Bonfire1996 said:
I predicted a 50 bp inversion by Thanksgiving, the most in 40 years. I'm going to feel pretty good about myself if that hits.
Agree with SAVA not having done anything wrong, and a probe would likely show that.FTAG 2000 said:
I don't read the article as SAVA has done anything wrong.
If the allegations are proven true, they are saying the entire premise of the protein causing Alzheimer's is illegitimate.
Given that's what SAVA has targeted and put all their work into, that would be a problem for them if found credible.
Now, their drug could still work, but if this theory is thrown in the trash by the NIH then it's absolutely going to have a negative impact on Cassava.
