Philip J Fry said:

---

DNN heading back down to 1.00? Rinse and repeat?

---

Not sure we will see below $1.07 if it wants to maintain trend lines. But I'll take it if presents itself.

20

frankm01 said:

---

MVIS is up 10% today, don't see any news. Premiums ripping. One of my favorite rentals.

---

It took a hit on Wed for no apparent reason (no news that I saw), and now it's making up for that and then some. I may get called out on some weeklies, but the premium was good so I'm not too concerned if it do. Plus it would lock in some nice profits.

KT 90 said:

---

frankm01 said:

---

MVIS is up 10% today, don't see any news. Premiums ripping. One of my favorite rentals.

---

It took a hit on Wed for no apparent reason (no news that I saw), and now it's making up for that and then some. I may get called out on some weeklies, but the premium was good so I'm not too concerned if it do. Plus it would lock in some nice profits.

---

I think the MVIS run today is just general association as a meme stock. No real news.

SPY NHOD

There's the S&P run I expected...

Man FB with the intraday reversal

I got in an an early lotto then right our after it hit so I trust your judgement on these for the most part. I am using them as a learning experience to see where I need to cut off my comfort and realize the higher risk level.

Spoony Love said:

---

I got in an an early lotto then right our after it hit so I trust your judgement on these for the most part. I am using them as a learning experience to see where I need to cut off my comfort and realize the higher risk level.

---

On lottos I go in expecting it to be a zero. I seldom let it go to zero but that's the mentality I take. I do less than 1/4 of normal size for sure and only with a % of profit from the week.

I play really small on these. Not to mention a Friday before a long weekend.

jimmo said:

---

AgEng06 said:

---

JDTxAg98 said:

---

CrazyRichAggie said:

---

Entered DISH 6/18 $50 Calls. Entry 0.26, target $1.50

$DISH .... Keep an eye on this one

Starting to carve out a beautiful bull flag here on the 20 day MA(Holy Grail setup). This pattern fails below $42.

Targets $50 to $55 area pic.twitter.com/NfujkBsk5h

— Traderstewie (@traderstewie) May 27, 2021

---

riding with ya

---

Same, in at $0.26.

---

same

---

Guess my order went in too late
didn't fill

In on the SPY 420P lotto tho

Greendale 87 said:

---

I feel obliged to publically thank PLTR for rescuing this $24 basis astronaut. We'll be a bit smarter on entry in the future - maybe!

---

Come on CLOV, you're next!

Of course it's up more now. I sold at $0.93!

jimmo said:

---

jimmo said:

---

AgEng06 said:

---

JDTxAg98 said:

---

CrazyRichAggie said:

---

Entered DISH 6/18 $50 Calls. Entry 0.26, target $1.50

$DISH .... Keep an eye on this one

Starting to carve out a beautiful bull flag here on the 20 day MA(Holy Grail setup). This pattern fails below $42.

Targets $50 to $55 area pic.twitter.com/NfujkBsk5h

— Traderstewie (@traderstewie) May 27, 2021

---

riding with ya

---

Same, in at $0.26.

---

same

---

Guess my order went in too late
didn't fill

In on the SPY 420P lotto tho

---

You can get in for ~30% discount right now...

I did !

Ccutamu said:

---

CrazyRichAggie said:

---

Ccutamu said:

---

CrazyRichAggie said:

---

CLOV setting up for a rippy day

---

I would be good with that... come rescue the astronauts!

---

Let's see if it can push up and hold $8.15 to $8.20

---

I'm thinking more in terms of $14. Go big or go home!!

---

This did not age well today.

FJ43 said:

---

Spoony Love said:

---

I see a .21 entry at 420p?

---

I added at .24 fill as lotto. Thats all it is for me.

Lower high

---

need that mid day Friday pullback and these will hit. (usually we get one)

Regarding weed. We got a tussle going on here in SD. Legalization passed for medical and recreation use (mind you, we are a very red State...something happen....illegal vote....or something else, I digress). Legislature didn't do a good job with wording the law. The medical community is not for this legalization and they're the one's that have to write a prescription so a medical use permit can be obtained. Doctor's aren't willing to prescribe willy-nilly. Weed may be legalized country-wide someday, but some States will keep the wheel chocks in place until level minds prevail. I got out of my SNDL shares some time ago. One way to prevent delays, just get doctor's out of the foray and let recreational take over. I believe in natural selection, let those that want to smoke it, do it. Just don't ask me to pay for their medical expenses - that's the reason why the law gets passed, right..."for medical purposes"...(?).

https://www.brookingsregister.com/article/south-dakota-passed-medical-pot-but-physicians-hesitate

Quote:

---

SIOUX FALLS (AP) Medical marijuana advocates have convinced South Dakota voters that legalizing the drug for medical use is a good idea, but they are struggling to do the same with many of the state's physicians.

A split between the state's largest doctors' association and medical pot proponents was evident Tuesday at a meeting for a legislative committee tasked with studying the issue. The South Dakota State Medical Association was one of the most vocal opponents of the ballot measure last year. Though the law passed with 70% of the vote in November, the organization's president, Dr. Benjamin Aaker, told lawmakers that many of its concerns with medical pot have remained.
That's a potential problem for medical pot advocates because the new law, set to take full effect in November, will depend on involvement from physicians. It will require people who want a medical marijuana ID to get a physician's written certification stating that patients have a "debilitating medical condition" and could benefit from using cannabis.
Aaker raised a host of issues with medical cannabis. He was concerned with how it will be administered, as well as medical problems associated with pot use like cancer, heart disease and schizophrenia. He also pointed to indications in other states that traffic fatalities, emergency room visits for drug overdose and children's consumption of pot all increased after medical marijuana was legalized.
But Melissa Mentele, who launched the medical cannabis legalization campaign, said that reluctance from physicians and health care providers could result in a bumbling rollout of the program that will ultimately hurt patients. She said she envisioned an environment where patients could receive a recommendation from their family physician, but worried that if health care providers opted out, it would leave room for "doc-in-a-box" facilities that have little oversight or mission beyond recommending medical pot.
"This will create a state filled with patients who have no option," she warned.
While Mentele charged that potential pot patients have been turned away from the state's largest health care systems, an organization that represents health care providers said they are currently working on policies to comply with the law. But as lawmakers consider possible changes to the law, health care providers are in no hurry to start issuing medical pot certifications.
"It's impossible to complete until this has played itself out," said Tim Rave, the president of the South Dakota Association of Healthcare Organizations.
The law will technically go into effect July 1, but state agencies have well into the fall to set up the program. The Department of Health has a Nov. 18 deadline to start issuing the medical marijuana ID cards that permit people to buy and grow pot in their homes, as well as protect them from arrest and prosecution. The state's Supreme Court is currently weighing a case that will decide whether a separate constitutional amendment legalizing both recreational and medical pot will take effect.
Aaker encouraged lawmakers to keep a tight list of medical conditions eligible for marijuana treatment, but he acknowledged that the research around medical cannabis has been limited and there are situations where patients benefit from it.
"If the intent is to help people who are hurting, we need to find the people that this can help," he said.

---

AG 2000' said:

---

CrazyRichAggie said:

---

Lil scoop: The Pentagon is seeking approval from Biden on strikes against Iranian-backed militias in Iraq, sources say.

“The administration is looking hard at a broad range of responses to Shiite militia aggression against Americans in Iraq,” one said.https://t.co/j1iUFM3EFu

— Shelby Talcott (@ShelbyTalcott) May 28, 2021

---

He'll approve it then give Iran another $150 billion in the middle of the night to apologize for it (while taking his 10% off the top).

---

I've said for awhile that a Democrat in the White House would quickly lead to a desert war. Need another bad guy to take bad PR away from China. I think this is good for NIO and our other favorite Chinese stocks here. Irish may finally profit from those Luckin shares.

Farmer @ Johnsongrass, TX said:

---

Regarding weed. We got a tussle going on here in SD. Legalization passed for medical and recreation use (mind you, we are a very red State...something happen....illegal vote....or something else, I digress). Legislature didn't do a good job with wording the law. The medical community is not for this legalization and they're the one's that have to write a prescription so a medical use permit can be obtained. Doctor's aren't willing to prescribe willy-nilly. Weed may be legalized country-wide someday, but some States will keep the wheel chocks in place until level minds prevail. I got out of my SNDL shares some time ago. One way to prevent delays, just get doctor's out of the foray and let recreational take over. I believe in natural selection, let those that want to smoke it, do it. Just don't ask me to pay for their medical expenses - that's the reason why the law gets passed, right..."for medical purposes"...(?).

https://www.brookingsregister.com/article/south-dakota-passed-medical-pot-but-physicians-hesitate

Quote:

---

SIOUX FALLS (AP) Medical marijuana advocates have convinced South Dakota voters that legalizing the drug for medical use is a good idea, but they are struggling to do the same with many of the state's physicians.

A split between the state's largest doctors' association and medical pot proponents was evident Tuesday at a meeting for a legislative committee tasked with studying the issue. The South Dakota State Medical Association was one of the most vocal opponents of the ballot measure last year. Though the law passed with 70% of the vote in November, the organization's president, Dr. Benjamin Aaker, told lawmakers that many of its concerns with medical pot have remained.
That's a potential problem for medical pot advocates because the new law, set to take full effect in November, will depend on involvement from physicians. It will require people who want a medical marijuana ID to get a physician's written certification stating that patients have a "debilitating medical condition" and could benefit from using cannabis.
Aaker raised a host of issues with medical cannabis. He was concerned with how it will be administered, as well as medical problems associated with pot use like cancer, heart disease and schizophrenia. He also pointed to indications in other states that traffic fatalities, emergency room visits for drug overdose and children's consumption of pot all increased after medical marijuana was legalized.
But Melissa Mentele, who launched the medical cannabis legalization campaign, said that reluctance from physicians and health care providers could result in a bumbling rollout of the program that will ultimately hurt patients. She said she envisioned an environment where patients could receive a recommendation from their family physician, but worried that if health care providers opted out, it would leave room for "doc-in-a-box" facilities that have little oversight or mission beyond recommending medical pot.
"This will create a state filled with patients who have no option," she warned.
While Mentele charged that potential pot patients have been turned away from the state's largest health care systems, an organization that represents health care providers said they are currently working on policies to comply with the law. But as lawmakers consider possible changes to the law, health care providers are in no hurry to start issuing medical pot certifications.
"It's impossible to complete until this has played itself out," said Tim Rave, the president of the South Dakota Association of Healthcare Organizations.
The law will technically go into effect July 1, but state agencies have well into the fall to set up the program. The Department of Health has a Nov. 18 deadline to start issuing the medical marijuana ID cards that permit people to buy and grow pot in their homes, as well as protect them from arrest and prosecution. The state's Supreme Court is currently weighing a case that will decide whether a separate constitutional amendment legalizing both recreational and medical pot will take effect.
Aaker encouraged lawmakers to keep a tight list of medical conditions eligible for marijuana treatment, but he acknowledged that the research around medical cannabis has been limited and there are situations where patients benefit from it.
"If the intent is to help people who are hurting, we need to find the people that this can help," he said.

---

---

I'm with you. I think it will pass nationwide but states will have their own set of rules. Same as alcohol. My son who is in LE and specifically drugs (he is a DRE) has said he expects it. But also said the rules of driving while under the influence won't be any different and that's where people will get in trouble.

Looks like SPY got spooked once it neared ATH

BREwmaster said:

---

FJ43 said:

---

Spoony Love said:

---

I see a .21 entry at 420p?

---

I added at .24 fill as lotto. Thats all it is for me.

Lower high

---

need that mid day Friday pullback and these will hit. (usually we get one)

---

Could be wrong but I think profit taking still yet to come. Not huge IMO but some. I actually added to my lotto at .11

FJ43 said:

---

Farmer @ Johnsongrass, TX said:

---

Regarding weed. We got a tussle going on here in SD. Legalization passed for medical and recreation use (mind you, we are a very red State...something happen....illegal vote....or something else, I digress). Legislature didn't do a good job with wording the law. The medical community is not for this legalization and they're the one's that have to write a prescription so a medical use permit can be obtained. Doctor's aren't willing to prescribe willy-nilly. Weed may be legalized country-wide someday, but some States will keep the wheel chocks in place until level minds prevail. I got out of my SNDL shares some time ago. One way to prevent delays, just get doctor's out of the foray and let recreational take over. I believe in natural selection, let those that want to smoke it, do it. Just don't ask me to pay for their medical expenses - that's the reason why the law gets passed, right..."for medical purposes"...(?).

https://www.brookingsregister.com/article/south-dakota-passed-medical-pot-but-physicians-hesitate

Quote:

---

SIOUX FALLS (AP) Medical marijuana advocates have convinced South Dakota voters that legalizing the drug for medical use is a good idea, but they are struggling to do the same with many of the state's physicians.

A split between the state's largest doctors' association and medical pot proponents was evident Tuesday at a meeting for a legislative committee tasked with studying the issue. The South Dakota State Medical Association was one of the most vocal opponents of the ballot measure last year. Though the law passed with 70% of the vote in November, the organization's president, Dr. Benjamin Aaker, told lawmakers that many of its concerns with medical pot have remained.
That's a potential problem for medical pot advocates because the new law, set to take full effect in November, will depend on involvement from physicians. It will require people who want a medical marijuana ID to get a physician's written certification stating that patients have a "debilitating medical condition" and could benefit from using cannabis.
Aaker raised a host of issues with medical cannabis. He was concerned with how it will be administered, as well as medical problems associated with pot use like cancer, heart disease and schizophrenia. He also pointed to indications in other states that traffic fatalities, emergency room visits for drug overdose and children's consumption of pot all increased after medical marijuana was legalized.
But Melissa Mentele, who launched the medical cannabis legalization campaign, said that reluctance from physicians and health care providers could result in a bumbling rollout of the program that will ultimately hurt patients. She said she envisioned an environment where patients could receive a recommendation from their family physician, but worried that if health care providers opted out, it would leave room for "doc-in-a-box" facilities that have little oversight or mission beyond recommending medical pot.
"This will create a state filled with patients who have no option," she warned.
While Mentele charged that potential pot patients have been turned away from the state's largest health care systems, an organization that represents health care providers said they are currently working on policies to comply with the law. But as lawmakers consider possible changes to the law, health care providers are in no hurry to start issuing medical pot certifications.
"It's impossible to complete until this has played itself out," said Tim Rave, the president of the South Dakota Association of Healthcare Organizations.
The law will technically go into effect July 1, but state agencies have well into the fall to set up the program. The Department of Health has a Nov. 18 deadline to start issuing the medical marijuana ID cards that permit people to buy and grow pot in their homes, as well as protect them from arrest and prosecution. The state's Supreme Court is currently weighing a case that will decide whether a separate constitutional amendment legalizing both recreational and medical pot will take effect.
Aaker encouraged lawmakers to keep a tight list of medical conditions eligible for marijuana treatment, but he acknowledged that the research around medical cannabis has been limited and there are situations where patients benefit from it.
"If the intent is to help people who are hurting, we need to find the people that this can help," he said.

---

---

I'm with you. I think it will pass nationwide but states will have their own set of rules. Same as alcohol. My son who is in LE and specifically drugs (he is a DRE) has said he expects it. But also said the rules of driving while under the influence won't be any different and that's where people will get in trouble.

---

My LEO friends say they don't even ticket for weed anymore as long as you're not under the influence and/or a dick. Said they just have them dump it out

Strategy question:
Crwd reports Thursday june 3. I have a couple june 11 210 and 215 calls left at net free +++ from selling half and thinking about the best way to capitalize.
Original thought was to just sell another half on the next bump and hold the remaining through er.
Next thought was to sell higher strike calls on half or all on the next bump to create a spread
Now it just occurred to me that i could sell something silly like 250s for june 4 to harvest premium, then sell june 11s against them again after those expire.
Thoughts?

Irish 2.0 said:

---

FJ43 said:

---

Farmer @ Johnsongrass, TX said:

---

Regarding weed. We got a tussle going on here in SD. Legalization passed for medical and recreation use (mind you, we are a very red State...something happen....illegal vote....or something else, I digress). Legislature didn't do a good job with wording the law. The medical community is not for this legalization and they're the one's that have to write a prescription so a medical use permit can be obtained. Doctor's aren't willing to prescribe willy-nilly. Weed may be legalized country-wide someday, but some States will keep the wheel chocks in place until level minds prevail. I got out of my SNDL shares some time ago. One way to prevent delays, just get doctor's out of the foray and let recreational take over. I believe in natural selection, let those that want to smoke it, do it. Just don't ask me to pay for their medical expenses - that's the reason why the law gets passed, right..."for medical purposes"...(?).

https://www.brookingsregister.com/article/south-dakota-passed-medical-pot-but-physicians-hesitate

Quote:

---

SIOUX FALLS (AP) Medical marijuana advocates have convinced South Dakota voters that legalizing the drug for medical use is a good idea, but they are struggling to do the same with many of the state's physicians.

A split between the state's largest doctors' association and medical pot proponents was evident Tuesday at a meeting for a legislative committee tasked with studying the issue. The South Dakota State Medical Association was one of the most vocal opponents of the ballot measure last year. Though the law passed with 70% of the vote in November, the organization's president, Dr. Benjamin Aaker, told lawmakers that many of its concerns with medical pot have remained.
That's a potential problem for medical pot advocates because the new law, set to take full effect in November, will depend on involvement from physicians. It will require people who want a medical marijuana ID to get a physician's written certification stating that patients have a "debilitating medical condition" and could benefit from using cannabis.
Aaker raised a host of issues with medical cannabis. He was concerned with how it will be administered, as well as medical problems associated with pot use like cancer, heart disease and schizophrenia. He also pointed to indications in other states that traffic fatalities, emergency room visits for drug overdose and children's consumption of pot all increased after medical marijuana was legalized.
But Melissa Mentele, who launched the medical cannabis legalization campaign, said that reluctance from physicians and health care providers could result in a bumbling rollout of the program that will ultimately hurt patients. She said she envisioned an environment where patients could receive a recommendation from their family physician, but worried that if health care providers opted out, it would leave room for "doc-in-a-box" facilities that have little oversight or mission beyond recommending medical pot.
"This will create a state filled with patients who have no option," she warned.
While Mentele charged that potential pot patients have been turned away from the state's largest health care systems, an organization that represents health care providers said they are currently working on policies to comply with the law. But as lawmakers consider possible changes to the law, health care providers are in no hurry to start issuing medical pot certifications.
"It's impossible to complete until this has played itself out," said Tim Rave, the president of the South Dakota Association of Healthcare Organizations.
The law will technically go into effect July 1, but state agencies have well into the fall to set up the program. The Department of Health has a Nov. 18 deadline to start issuing the medical marijuana ID cards that permit people to buy and grow pot in their homes, as well as protect them from arrest and prosecution. The state's Supreme Court is currently weighing a case that will decide whether a separate constitutional amendment legalizing both recreational and medical pot will take effect.
Aaker encouraged lawmakers to keep a tight list of medical conditions eligible for marijuana treatment, but he acknowledged that the research around medical cannabis has been limited and there are situations where patients benefit from it.
"If the intent is to help people who are hurting, we need to find the people that this can help," he said.

---

---

I'm with you. I think it will pass nationwide but states will have their own set of rules. Same as alcohol. My son who is in LE and specifically drugs (he is a DRE) has said he expects it. But also said the rules of driving while under the influence won't be any different and that's where people will get in trouble.

---

My LEO friends say they don't even ticket for weed anymore as long as you're not under the influence and/or a dick. Said they just have them dump it out

---

Same for my son when he catches someone with it. All depends on how much. However same as being cooperative or not and especially if driving. Now all bets are off when he's doing his normal SWAT stuff.

For trades next week:

• I still think WYNN looks solid, but I'm not going to manage it, so I am going to go ahead and take the gains. I think this is fine to hold. I would move my cut line up to 131 on it, though.
• I'm keeping GOOGL longs
• I am going to take long bets on SPX and NDX with a June 18 expiration. I want to be out of this likely by the end of next week
• Keeping AHT stock
• Gold and Silver likely keep on trucking
• I'm keeping my small June 18 SPY 405/395 hedge on

thank you sir!