I don't think that's what passed.McInnis 03 said:
The bazooka bill
https://financialservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/fsc_covid-19_legislative_package_-_03.18.20.pdf
I don't think that's what passed.McInnis 03 said:
The bazooka bill
https://financialservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/fsc_covid-19_legislative_package_-_03.18.20.pdf
You understand finance much better than the average person. It isn't insane to talk to your friends or parents about money, especially when you know they need help. This is going to be especially true over the next couple months when people need help prioritizing expenses and digging themselves out of holes. It isn't insane to ask your buddy that knows about cars to help you fix your car, and it isn't insane to ask your buddy that knows about budgeting to help you with your budget. I think you will be blown away with how poorly people manage their money.khaos288 said:I don't have the budgets of my friends. That's an insane request. I do know I see them with budget/cash cars, none of them are smokers, and very few are out there buying the newest iphone every year. I can tell you for sure my parents are in this group. The have a 15 year old car, and a 28 year old work van for transportation. They rarely eat out, and would kill to have a couple grand in the bank. They're hoping to continue working well after starting to collect social security so they don't leave us with a pile of bills, and they don't have retirement money anyway.gig em 02 said:You don't know anyone in the second group, or you aren't aware that 95% of the middle class is in the second group? You don't really think that people can afford $1000 iphones, $50,000 F150s, netflix, data plans, cable, pandora, apple music, gym memberships, eating out, alcohol, cigarettes, etc., do you?khaos288 said:This is the worst take I've seen on texags maybe ever.gig em 02 said:
I know plenty of people make $300k+ that live paycheck to paycheck. I also know millionaires with less than $100k in "income". Oh well, nothing better than handing thousands of dollars to people that have no idea how to handle their money. If they weren't smart enough to have an emergency fund, why would anyone think they'd be smart enough to use cash appropriately?
You think "being smart" is the reason most people don't have an emergency fund? The number of people I know barely scraping by and worrying about rent/mortgage versus the number of people who spend lavishly every month with zero savings has to be an infinite ratio. I don't know anyone in the second category, and tons in the first.
Send me the budgets of 10 of the 'tons' of people you know and I'll carve out plenty over the last decade of economic prosperity for them to have an emergency fund.
I think you're spouting rhetoric of the loud few instead of the silent majority. I can already tell there's not going to be a point to this arguing relevant to investing though, so we need not even continue conversing.
You *******.IrishTxAggie said:Prognightmare said:20K? My divorce is almost over. Where can I meet you for hookers and blow?IrishTxAggie said:gig em 02 said:Depends how you define "liquid", its not uncommon for people to consider stocks "liquid".IrishTxAggie said:Exsurge Domine said:aginlakeway said:It depends for how many years he's made 250k.Exsurge Domine said:
I read somewhere that the average person who makes 250k/year has like 20k liquid to his name
It shouldn't
It does. People that are generally in that income don't keep large amounts of cash around. Money in the bank doesn't "work" for them.
I define liquid as I can walk into a bank and walk out with $20k in under 5mins...without it being a robbery
Two things I don't share:
My wh0res
My cocaine
I'll raise a glass of bourbon with ya though.
aginlakeway said:I don't think that's what passed.McInnis 03 said:
The bazooka bill
https://financialservices.house.gov/uploadedfiles/fsc_covid-19_legislative_package_-_03.18.20.pdf
Quote:
McConnell said this larger, more comprehensive relief bill will also be an effort to "put money directly into the hands" of American workers and families.
But McConnell will certainly need buy-in from Senate Democrats, and eventually, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, to pass what is expected to be one of the largest, most expansive emergency spending packages in American history.
We make life and death choices a lot, but not like this, not choosing who gets a resource like a ventilator because we don't have any more. Lots of discussions with patients and families about whether it's appropriate to use one or withdraw care, but not 'we don't have one'. Stopping care when it's futile is not the same from being unable to give care to someone who might have a chance.IrishTxAggie said:docaggie said:
There may be some selection bias here though.
What they're currently doing in Italy is that they've established criteria for whether someone gets a ventilator or not. Over a certain age? No ventilator. They are literally selecting who potentially lives or dies.
So, the older and sicker are the ones left off ventilatory support, therefore they are more likely to die. I'm not saying that's why those with more co-morbidities are dying - as it can certainly be the fact that they're sicker to start with - but it can play a role.
If you were a doctor and you only had one ventilator, who would you prioritize; 70+ y/o or early 40+ y/o?
Assuming your handle is what I think it is, doctors make life and death choices all the time. It's not that they want to, but they have to weigh certain situations and potential outcomes.
yes, I have hope that it will sweep through and be gone, and that the measures many are taking in this country to isolate and protect themselves will hasten this. I'd like to get back to wondering what crazy thing we're going to see the market do next.Prognightmare said:
I have no doubt tha5 is the case. However, the numbers of people infected and then dying are decreasing rapidly in countries ahead of us. If these reports turn out to be accurate then this correction is almost complete, IMO.
docaggie said:We make life and death choices a lot, but not like this, not choosing who gets a resource like a ventilator because we don't have any more. Lots of discussions with patients and families about whether it's appropriate to use one or withdraw care, but not 'we don't have one'. Stopping care when it's futile is not the same from being unable to give care to someone who might have a chance.IrishTxAggie said:docaggie said:
There may be some selection bias here though.
What they're currently doing in Italy is that they've established criteria for whether someone gets a ventilator or not. Over a certain age? No ventilator. They are literally selecting who potentially lives or dies.
So, the older and sicker are the ones left off ventilatory support, therefore they are more likely to die. I'm not saying that's why those with more co-morbidities are dying - as it can certainly be the fact that they're sicker to start with - but it can play a role.
If you were a doctor and you only had one ventilator, who would you prioritize; 70+ y/o or early 40+ y/o?
Assuming your handle is what I think it is, doctors make life and death choices all the time. It's not that they want to, but they have to weigh certain situations and potential outcomes.
I would just need to see actual facts to believe that the majority of my anecdotal evidence is full of people who are the exception. I haven't seen any of those yet. I've seen one persons opinion who flies in the face of what I've seen recently.gig em 02 said:You understand finance much better than the average person. It isn't insane to talk to your friends or parents about money, especially when you know they need help. This is going to be especially true over the next couple months when people need help prioritizing expenses and digging themselves out of holes. It isn't insane to ask your buddy that knows about cars to help you fix your car, and it isn't insane to ask your buddy that knows about budgeting to help you with your budget. I think you will be blown away with how poorly people manage their money.khaos288 said:I don't have the budgets of my friends. That's an insane request. I do know I see them with budget/cash cars, none of them are smokers, and very few are out there buying the newest iphone every year. I can tell you for sure my parents are in this group. The have a 15 year old car, and a 28 year old work van for transportation. They rarely eat out, and would kill to have a couple grand in the bank. They're hoping to continue working well after starting to collect social security so they don't leave us with a pile of bills, and they don't have retirement money anyway.gig em 02 said:You don't know anyone in the second group, or you aren't aware that 95% of the middle class is in the second group? You don't really think that people can afford $1000 iphones, $50,000 F150s, netflix, data plans, cable, pandora, apple music, gym memberships, eating out, alcohol, cigarettes, etc., do you?khaos288 said:This is the worst take I've seen on texags maybe ever.gig em 02 said:
I know plenty of people make $300k+ that live paycheck to paycheck. I also know millionaires with less than $100k in "income". Oh well, nothing better than handing thousands of dollars to people that have no idea how to handle their money. If they weren't smart enough to have an emergency fund, why would anyone think they'd be smart enough to use cash appropriately?
You think "being smart" is the reason most people don't have an emergency fund? The number of people I know barely scraping by and worrying about rent/mortgage versus the number of people who spend lavishly every month with zero savings has to be an infinite ratio. I don't know anyone in the second category, and tons in the first.
Send me the budgets of 10 of the 'tons' of people you know and I'll carve out plenty over the last decade of economic prosperity for them to have an emergency fund.
I think you're spouting rhetoric of the loud few instead of the silent majority. I can already tell there's not going to be a point to this arguing relevant to investing though, so we need not even continue conversing.
You don't know your friends budgets, yet you will repeat the talking points as if they are true (even though you admit you have no idea) and then accuse me of spouting rhetoric. Maybe don't just brush something off just because it challenges your world view (which you admit isn't a view based on a review of the facts).
That's all I got. Happy to read your response but I agree this is off topic so this is my last response.
I actually follow them closely. A SIGNIFICANT portion of the compensation package was Penn Stock and he wanted it that way. Erika too. They are hurting.McInnis 03 said:hedge_zer0 said:
El Pres having a rough week, brady now this
He already got his I'm sure
I'm glad you 2 are covering the important stuff! the board needs more humor lately!Prognightmare said:You *******.IrishTxAggie said:Prognightmare said:20K? My divorce is almost over. Where can I meet you for hookers and blow?IrishTxAggie said:gig em 02 said:Depends how you define "liquid", its not uncommon for people to consider stocks "liquid".IrishTxAggie said:Exsurge Domine said:aginlakeway said:It depends for how many years he's made 250k.Exsurge Domine said:
I read somewhere that the average person who makes 250k/year has like 20k liquid to his name
It shouldn't
It does. People that are generally in that income don't keep large amounts of cash around. Money in the bank doesn't "work" for them.
I define liquid as I can walk into a bank and walk out with $20k in under 5mins...without it being a robbery
Two things I don't share:
My wh0res
My cocaine
I'll raise a glass of bourbon with ya though.
Quote:
McConnell said this larger, more comprehensive relief bill will also be an effort to "put money directly into the hands" of American workers and families.
But McConnell will certainly need buy-in from Senate Democrats, and eventually, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, to pass what is expected to be one of the largest, most expansive emergency spending packages in American history.
DIS capitulating at $79 was insanity. When was the last time it was there, 3 years ago? I'm just guessing, but Huge bargain there. LADR was another one today.thirdcoast said:
Guess I should go cover my seaworld and RCL shorts this week.
Great call on DIS $6 Jul calls earlier today!
BREwmaster said:DIS capitulating at $79 was insanity. When was the last time it was there, 3 years ago? I'm just guessing, but Huge bargain there. LADR was another one today.thirdcoast said:
Guess I should go cover my seaworld and RCL shorts this week.
Great call on DIS $6 Jul calls earlier today!
I did scoop ROKU at 58.50 though!
Boat Shoes said:BREwmaster said:DIS capitulating at $79 was insanity. When was the last time it was there, 3 years ago? I'm just guessing, but Huge bargain there. LADR was another one today.thirdcoast said:
Guess I should go cover my seaworld and RCL shorts this week.
Great call on DIS $6 Jul calls earlier today!
I did scoop ROKU at 58.50 though!
DIS still a buy at $90? Or let it come back down?
khaos288 said:Boat Shoes said:BREwmaster said:DIS capitulating at $79 was insanity. When was the last time it was there, 3 years ago? I'm just guessing, but Huge bargain there. LADR was another one today.thirdcoast said:
Guess I should go cover my seaworld and RCL shorts this week.
Great call on DIS $6 Jul calls earlier today!
I did scoop ROKU at 58.50 though!
DIS still a buy at $90? Or let it come back down?
Give it a day or two. We haven't printed two green day's in a row yet.
As an update:aggiehunter3 said:
Here's what I bought today:
1. CXO shortly after open at $40, but I was antsy and sold for 20% gain as it recovered to $48 intraday. FWIW Aggie CEO and solid financials
2. Added to my position of LADR (paying 8+%)
3. SBSI
4. MSFT calls for a bounce
SoupNazi2001 said:
Futures close to limit down again
A down open and a green close would be an ideal setup.SoupNazi2001 said:
Futures close to limit down again
Prognightmare said:A down open and a green close would be an ideal setup.SoupNazi2001 said:
Futures close to limit down again