quote:
quote:
quote:
Just keep buying and "$ cost avg"
Just like in 08/09... as long as you just kept buying you ended up just fine.... the only people who lost were folks that tried to time the market...sold....and then waited too long to buy...missing all the recovery gains.
Just keep buying (ESPECIALLY in the types of accounts youre describing)
Sarcasm? Quick example: the last bear cycle I had taken my dad's 401k to cash and bought back in and when moved back out last year he had realized 329% gains or 63%/year avg. Please post your 5 year performance as a %. I'll take my approach.
He didn't say if you sold and bought back in that you lost (the way you apparently comprehended it and felt obliged to prove him wrong).. he said the only ones that did lose are the ones who did this.
In other words, if you stayed in, you didn't lose.. myself included. I didn't touch anything in 08/09 (I pumped a lot in during that time), and I came out with near 100% return by 2010.
My apologies, as that was not my intent. You didn't lose if you were in the right funds. If you were in the wrong funds you lost, and some lost big even at market highs. Over 82% of all funds in 401k's are flat over a 39 month period. So while I understand the long-view philosophy it is not the most expedient way to build wealth. That is the lie of the fund managers, who require your money to exist.
And if you're income is over $150k for a 10 year period your current 401k value is vastly different than the Ag making less than $100k.
And I was not using the opportunity to "brag". I have no need for such sophomoric behavior. I simply use case study and examples to distinguish methodologies. If doing so upsets people that's not my problem. It's serious business.